反兴奋剂规则统一适用的困难和发展——加特林案的新思考
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:A Case Study of Development of Anti-doping Rules Harmonization:on Justin Gatlin Case
  • 作者:李真
  • 英文作者:LI Zhen;School of law,Wuhan Univ.;
  • 关键词:反兴奋剂 ; 世界反兴奋机构 ; 世界反兴奋剂条例 ; 签约方合规国际标准
  • 英文关键词:anti-doping;;Word Anti-Doping Agency;;Word Anti-Doping Code;;international standard for compliance of contracting parties
  • 中文刊名:WTXB
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education
  • 机构:武汉大学法学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-03-15
  • 出版单位:武汉体育学院学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.52;No.328
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金项目“反对与防治兴奋剂的法律机制研究”(17BTY007)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:WTXB201803008
  • 页数:5
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:42-1105/G8
  • 分类号:51-55
摘要
世界反兴奋剂机构成立的目的之一即统一反兴奋剂规则。通过对加特林违禁案件进行分析,引出反兴奋剂规则统一适用的困难,包括不能直接适用WADA条例、体育组织之间规则相异以及各体育组织不遵守规则。采取文献资料法和案例分析法对这些困难进行阐述和分析,并联系反兴奋剂规则的最新发展展开讨论。
        The World Anti-Doping Agency(WADA)has been established to harmonize the anti-doping rules.This paper analyzed the Justin Gatlin case through literature review and case study so that the difficulties in the harmonization of anti-doping rules could be revealed.These difficulties included no direct application of the World Anti-doping Code,the contradiction of the rules of different organizations and the non-compliance of signatories.Finally,the paper introduced the newest development of the rules of the anti-doping system.
引文
[1]Ben Rumsby.The Telegraph[EB/OL].http://www.telegraph.co.uk/athletics/2017/08/06/justin-gatlin-should-ha ve-banned-life-convicted-drugs-cheat,2017-8-10.
    [2]赵澄宇,薄云霄,等.五环旗下的幽灵[M].北京:知识出版社,2000:46.
    [3]CAS 2008/A/1461 Gatlin v/USADA CAS2008/A/1462IAAF v/USATF&Gatlin.
    [4]CAS 2009/A/1817 World Anti-Doping Agency(WADA)&Fédération Internationale de Football Association(FI FA)v.Cyprus Football Association(CFA).
    [5]CAS 2008/A/1564World Anti-doping Agency(WADA)v.International Ice Hockey Federation(IIHF)&Florian Busch.
    [6]CAS 2008/A/1575,CAS 2008/A/1627,CAS 2008/A/1576,CAS 2008/A/1628,2008/A/1588,CAS 2008/A/1629.
    [7]张霞.中国运动员廖辉国际体育仲裁案件述评[J].西安体育学院学报,2015,32(1):16-21.
    [8]CAS 2011/O/2422 United States Olympic Committee(USOC)v.International Olympic Committee(IOC).
    [9]游泳运动员欧阳鲲鹏被禁赛后的8年[EB/OL].http://money.163.com/16/0815/16/BUH9SIGI00253B0H.html.
    [10]CAS 2016/O/4684ROC et al.v IAAF.
    [11]WADA.Report of the WADA Working Group on Code Compliance[EB/OL].https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/wada_wg_reportcodecompliance_02may2014.pdf.
    [12]Jonathan Taylor.Is Enhanced World Anti-Doping Code Compliance Monitoring(Part of)the Solution?[EB-OL].https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resour ces/files/compliance_presentation_-_2017_wada_symposium.pdf.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700