社会智库筹资能力及其提升策略研究
|
摘要
[目的/意义]资金作为社会智库运行的"血液",其多寡和来源是否稳定将直接影响社会智库的生存与发展。研究筹资能力及其影响因素将为社会智库进一步发展提供有益借鉴。[方法/过程]基于国内外权威智库评价指标体系构建了筹资能力指标体系,通过网络搜集到147家社会智库,采用无放回抽样方法确定21个样本。通过描述性统计、因子分析测算了社会智库筹资能力,采用信度分析检验了指标有效性,通过逐步回归分析了社会智库筹资能力的影响因素。[结果/结论]研究发现,社会智库筹资能力整体较弱,且存在分化现象,人际关系在筹资中依然占主导地位,资金渠道单一且供给不足,亟需拓宽筹资渠道,完善内部筹资机构来提升筹资能力。
[Purpose/Significance]As the "blood" of the operation of social think tanks, the amount and source of funds will directly affect the survival and development of social think tanks. Studying the financing ability and its influencing factors will provide useful reference for the further development of social think tanks. [Method/Process]Based on the evaluation index system of authoritative think tanks at home and abroad, the index system of financing capacity was constructed. 147 social think tanks were collected through the network, and 21 samples were determined by non-return sampling method. Through descriptive statistics and factor analysis, the fund-raising ability of social think tanks is estimated, the reliability analysis is used to test the effectiveness of the indicators, and the factors influencing the fund-raising ability of social think tanks are analyzed by stepwise regression.[Result/Conclusion]The research finds that the financing capacity of social think tanks is weak as a whole, and there is a phenomenon of differentiation. Interpersonal relationship still plays a dominant role in financing. The financing channels are single and insufficient. It is urgent to broaden the financing channels and improve the internal financing institutions to enhance the financing capacity.
[Purpose/Significance]As the "blood" of the operation of social think tanks, the amount and source of funds will directly affect the survival and development of social think tanks. Studying the financing ability and its influencing factors will provide useful reference for the further development of social think tanks. [Method/Process]Based on the evaluation index system of authoritative think tanks at home and abroad, the index system of financing capacity was constructed. 147 social think tanks were collected through the network, and 21 samples were determined by non-return sampling method. Through descriptive statistics and factor analysis, the fund-raising ability of social think tanks is estimated, the reliability analysis is used to test the effectiveness of the indicators, and the factors influencing the fund-raising ability of social think tanks are analyzed by stepwise regression.[Result/Conclusion]The research finds that the financing capacity of social think tanks is weak as a whole, and there is a phenomenon of differentiation. Interpersonal relationship still plays a dominant role in financing. The financing channels are single and insufficient. It is urgent to broaden the financing channels and improve the internal financing institutions to enhance the financing capacity.
引文
[1] 钱再见.当代中国民间思想库及其功能实现路径研究[J].行政论坛,2013(5):54-31.
[2] 王斯敏.2015年中国智库年度发展报告[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016:189.
[3] 李迅.我国社会智库资金筹集:渠道、影响因素和机制构建[J].智库理论与实践,2018(2):1-8.
[4] 周荣庭,徐盼.我国社会智库有效发展策略研究[J].电子科技大学学报,2017(5):27-33.
[5] 陈升.社会智库运行机制与影响力:国内四个案例的比较研究[J].情报杂志,2018,37(9):1-6.
[6] 张旭.智库背后的资本力量——美国智库筹资市场及其制度分析[J].情报杂志,2018,37(5):6-12,5.
[7] 卢咏.第三力量——美国非营利机构与民间外交[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.
[8] 刘红春.我国社会智库健康发展的几个思路[J].理论探索,2017(3):115-121.
[9] 苗绿,王辉耀.中国智库资金来源多元化初探[J].科学与管理,2017(4):11-14.
[10] 沈进健.美国智库的形成、运作和影响[J].中国社会科学评价,2016(2):13-37.
[11] 熊励,陆悦.中国智库融资模式的研究——来自国际知名智库的启示[J].智库理论与实践,2016(1):62-67.
[12] 中国国际经济交流中心赴美考察团.美国全球知名智库发展现状与启示[N].光明日报,2016-08-10 (016).
[13] 张宁.TTCSP对中国智库评价和发展的启示[J].中国高校科技,2018(Z1):96-100.
[14] 金家厚.民间智库发展:现状、逻辑与机制[J].行政论坛,2014(1):56-61.
[15] 田萍.经济学视野下的中国民间智库:问题与出路[J].广西社会科学,2015(4):99-107.
[16] 王文.善用退休高官打造中国“旋转门”[J].对外传播,2014(6):37-39.
[17] 荆林波.智库评价方法综论[J].晋阳学刊,2016 (4) :134-143.
[18] 邱均平,任全娥.我国人文社会科学研究成果评价研究进展[J].情报资料工作,2006(4):10-15.
[19] 吴强,梁樑.基于文献聚合分析的科技竞争力指标体系研究[J].科学学研究,2005(S1):73-79.
[20] 汤杰,郭秀颖.市场调查与预测[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,2011:61-62.
[21] 张红兵.SPSS宝典[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2007:125.
[22] 吴明隆.问卷统计分析务实:SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.
[23] 谢寿光.智库评论(第1辑)[A]//钟欣,周弈风.中国社会智库发展模式及功能——以察哈尔学会为例[C].社会科学文献出版社,2015:39-59.
[2] 王斯敏.2015年中国智库年度发展报告[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016:189.
[3] 李迅.我国社会智库资金筹集:渠道、影响因素和机制构建[J].智库理论与实践,2018(2):1-8.
[4] 周荣庭,徐盼.我国社会智库有效发展策略研究[J].电子科技大学学报,2017(5):27-33.
[5] 陈升.社会智库运行机制与影响力:国内四个案例的比较研究[J].情报杂志,2018,37(9):1-6.
[6] 张旭.智库背后的资本力量——美国智库筹资市场及其制度分析[J].情报杂志,2018,37(5):6-12,5.
[7] 卢咏.第三力量——美国非营利机构与民间外交[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.
[8] 刘红春.我国社会智库健康发展的几个思路[J].理论探索,2017(3):115-121.
[9] 苗绿,王辉耀.中国智库资金来源多元化初探[J].科学与管理,2017(4):11-14.
[10] 沈进健.美国智库的形成、运作和影响[J].中国社会科学评价,2016(2):13-37.
[11] 熊励,陆悦.中国智库融资模式的研究——来自国际知名智库的启示[J].智库理论与实践,2016(1):62-67.
[12] 中国国际经济交流中心赴美考察团.美国全球知名智库发展现状与启示[N].光明日报,2016-08-10 (016).
[13] 张宁.TTCSP对中国智库评价和发展的启示[J].中国高校科技,2018(Z1):96-100.
[14] 金家厚.民间智库发展:现状、逻辑与机制[J].行政论坛,2014(1):56-61.
[15] 田萍.经济学视野下的中国民间智库:问题与出路[J].广西社会科学,2015(4):99-107.
[16] 王文.善用退休高官打造中国“旋转门”[J].对外传播,2014(6):37-39.
[17] 荆林波.智库评价方法综论[J].晋阳学刊,2016 (4) :134-143.
[18] 邱均平,任全娥.我国人文社会科学研究成果评价研究进展[J].情报资料工作,2006(4):10-15.
[19] 吴强,梁樑.基于文献聚合分析的科技竞争力指标体系研究[J].科学学研究,2005(S1):73-79.
[20] 汤杰,郭秀颖.市场调查与预测[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,2011:61-62.
[21] 张红兵.SPSS宝典[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2007:125.
[22] 吴明隆.问卷统计分析务实:SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.
[23] 谢寿光.智库评论(第1辑)[A]//钟欣,周弈风.中国社会智库发展模式及功能——以察哈尔学会为例[C].社会科学文献出版社,2015:39-59.