行政人格与个体人格互动错位下的行政失灵研究
|
摘要
行政过程的推动及行政效果的实现依赖于行政主体与行政客体的互动,作为行为的内在指引,人格影响着行政主体与行政客体的互动质量。不同的行政体制要求和型塑不同的行政人格,不同的社会状态要求和型塑不同的个体人格,两者人格的匹配程度影响着行政效果的实现。人格具有稳定性及独立性,转变速度可能落后或超前于政治经济社会体制,行政人格与个体人格都可能与制度存在不匹配,加之制度自身存在的不完善,依赖于此的行政人格与个体人格也存在一定缺陷,行政人格与个体人格发生互动错位,导致行政失灵。
The promotion of the administrative process and the realization of the administrative effect depend on the interaction between the administrative subject and the object. As the internal guidance of the behavior,the personality affects the interactive quality of the administrative subject and the object. Different administrative systems require and shape different types of administrative personality,while different social conditions require and shape different types of individual personality. The matching and matching degree of the two personalities affects the implementation of the administrative effect. The personality is stable and independent,so the speed of transformation may lag behind or ahead of the political and economic social system. The administrative personality and individual personality may not match the system. Additionally,the system itself is imperfect,so there is a definite defect in the administrative personality and individual personality. Therefore,the interactive dislocation occurs between the two personalities,which leads to the administrative failure.
The promotion of the administrative process and the realization of the administrative effect depend on the interaction between the administrative subject and the object. As the internal guidance of the behavior,the personality affects the interactive quality of the administrative subject and the object. Different administrative systems require and shape different types of administrative personality,while different social conditions require and shape different types of individual personality. The matching and matching degree of the two personalities affects the implementation of the administrative effect. The personality is stable and independent,so the speed of transformation may lag behind or ahead of the political and economic social system. The administrative personality and individual personality may not match the system. Additionally,the system itself is imperfect,so there is a definite defect in the administrative personality and individual personality. Therefore,the interactive dislocation occurs between the two personalities,which leads to the administrative failure.
引文
[1]张康之,杨艳.论行政人格的历史类型[J].江海学刊,2004(6):87-93+223.
[2]张成福.大变革:中国行政改革的目标与行为选择[M].北京:改革出版社,1993:146-147.
[3]张兴国,张兴祥.“李约瑟难题”与王亚南的中国官僚政治研究[J].广东社会科学,2003(2):119-124.
[4]周雪光.权威体制与有效治理:当代中国国家治理的制度逻辑[J].开放时代,2011(10):67-85.
[5]马克斯·韦伯.经济与社会[M].林荣远,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997:243-246.
[6]拉塞尔·M·林登.无缝隙政府:公共部门再造指南[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014.
[7]汪大海.顾客社会与无缝隙政府[J].中国行政管理,2002(3):36-38.
[8]余潇枫,盛晓蓉.论公民人格[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),1998(2):24-31.
[9]刘波.公民人格的生成——中国公民人格形塑研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2008.
[10]朱晓阳.“彻底解释”农民的地权观[J].法律和社会科学,2011(8):27-48.
[11]周雪光.国家治理逻辑与中国官僚体制:一个韦伯理论视角[J].文化纵横,2013(3):14.
[12]阎步克.士大夫政治演生史稿[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1996.
[13]庄海涛.官僚制、新公共管理与中国行政模式选择[D].济南:山东大学,2005.
[14]英克尔斯,曹中德.人的现代化素质探索[M].天津:天津社会科学院出版社,1995:126-129.
[2]张成福.大变革:中国行政改革的目标与行为选择[M].北京:改革出版社,1993:146-147.
[3]张兴国,张兴祥.“李约瑟难题”与王亚南的中国官僚政治研究[J].广东社会科学,2003(2):119-124.
[4]周雪光.权威体制与有效治理:当代中国国家治理的制度逻辑[J].开放时代,2011(10):67-85.
[5]马克斯·韦伯.经济与社会[M].林荣远,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997:243-246.
[6]拉塞尔·M·林登.无缝隙政府:公共部门再造指南[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014.
[7]汪大海.顾客社会与无缝隙政府[J].中国行政管理,2002(3):36-38.
[8]余潇枫,盛晓蓉.论公民人格[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),1998(2):24-31.
[9]刘波.公民人格的生成——中国公民人格形塑研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2008.
[10]朱晓阳.“彻底解释”农民的地权观[J].法律和社会科学,2011(8):27-48.
[11]周雪光.国家治理逻辑与中国官僚体制:一个韦伯理论视角[J].文化纵横,2013(3):14.
[12]阎步克.士大夫政治演生史稿[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1996.
[13]庄海涛.官僚制、新公共管理与中国行政模式选择[D].济南:山东大学,2005.
[14]英克尔斯,曹中德.人的现代化素质探索[M].天津:天津社会科学院出版社,1995:126-129.