陆相页岩孔隙结构特征研究——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组页岩为例
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Characterization of lacustrine shale pore structure:An example from the Upper-Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin
  • 作者:俞雨溪 ; 罗晓容 ; 雷裕红 ; 程明 ; 王香增 ; 张丽霞 ; 姜呈馥 ; 尹锦涛 ; 张立宽
  • 英文作者:Yu Yu-xi;Luo Xiao-rong;Lei Yu-hong;Cheng Ming;Wang Xiang-zeng;Zhang Li-xia;Jiang Cheng-fu;Yin Jing-tao;Zhang Li-kuan;Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources Research,Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum(Group)Co.Ltd.;Engineering Research Center for Lacustrine Shale Gas;
  • 关键词:页岩气 ; 陆相页岩 ; 孔隙结构 ; 粉砂质纹层 ; 鄂尔多斯盆地
  • 英文关键词:Shale gas;;Lacustrine shale;;Pore structure;;Silty laminae;;Ordos Basin
  • 中文刊名:TDKX
  • 英文刊名:Natural Gas Geoscience
  • 机构:中国科学院油气资源研究重点实验室,中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所;中国科学院大学;陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司;陆相页岩气工程研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2016-04-10
  • 出版单位:天然气地球科学
  • 年:2016
  • 期:v.27;No.161
  • 基金:国家重大科技专项课题(编号:2011ZX08005-004);; 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:41102078)联合资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:TDKX201604017
  • 页数:11
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:62-1177/TE
  • 分类号:150-160
摘要
鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组张家滩陆相页岩层系中发育大量粉砂质纹层,与相邻纯页岩呈薄互层状产出。为了更全面地研究页岩层系的孔隙结构发育特征,采用物理方法分离页岩岩心中的粉砂质纹层和纯页岩层,综合采用二氧化碳吸附法、氮气吸附法和压汞法获得全孔径范围内的孔隙结构特征。结果表明:粉砂质纹层孔径分布特征呈多峰分布,发育微米级孔隙,孔径较大,总孔体积平均为2.02mL/g,孔隙度平均为5.40%,大孔(>50nm)是其孔体积的主要贡献者;纯页岩孔径分布特征呈双峰分布,主要分布在100nm以下孔径区间,孔径较小,总孔体积平均为1.41mL/g,孔隙度平均为3.67%,中孔(2~50nm)是其孔体积的主要贡献者。粉砂质纹层的实测孔隙度是纯页岩孔隙度的1.2~1.8倍,估算渗透率比纯页岩大2~4个数量级。因此,页岩层系中的粉砂质纹层相对纯页岩具有较大的孔径和孔体积,有利于提高页岩层系整体的储渗能力。
        Amounts of silty laminae in continental shale gas reservoir were investigated for the Zhangjiatan shale of Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin.The purpose of this study is to provide awareness of the nature and discrepancies in pore structure between the silty laminae and clayey laminae.By separating the silty laminae from the shale core mechanically,a combination measurement series of mercury injection capillary pressure,N2 adsorption and carbon dioxide adsorption were performed on the two parts.An integrated pore size distribution covering pore diameter range of 0.1nm-100μm was obtained by using appropriate sample particle size and calculation model.The comparative analysis of pore structure shows that the clayey laminae are dominated by mesopore and micropore while the silty laminae are dominated by macropore.The pore volume distribution in clayey laminae can be sorted as mesopore>micropore>macropore while in silty laminae it is macropore> mesopore>micropore.The average total pore volume is 2.02m3/100 g for silty laminae and 1.41m~3/100 g for clayey laminae The porosity of silty laminae is 5.40%,which is larger than that of clayey laminae 3.67%.Since the silty laminae have larger pore width and pore space,they are more permeable and porous than the clayey laminae and can act as favorable conduits and reservoirs for shale gas.
引文
[1]Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Wang Shejiao,et al.Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6):641-653.[邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653.]
    [2]Dong Dazhong,Zou Caineng,Yang Hua,et al.Progress and prospects of shale gas exploration and development in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(supplement1):107-114.[董大忠,邹才能,杨桦,等.中国页岩气勘探开发进展与发展前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(增刊1):107-114.]
    [3]Lin Lamei,Zhang Jinchuan,Tang Xuan,et al.Conditions of continental shale gas accumulation in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(1):35-40.[林腊梅,张金川,唐玄,等.中国陆相页岩气的形成条件[J].天然气工业,2013,33(1):35-40.]
    [4]Sondergeld C H,Newsham K E,Rice M C,et al.Petrophysical Considerations in Evaluation and Producing Shale Gas Resources[C].SPE Unconventional Gas Conference,23-25February,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,USA.SPE 131768.2010.
    [5]Josh M,Esteban L,Piane C D,et al.Laboratory characterization of shale properties[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2012,88/89:107-124.
    [6]Adesida A.PoreSize Distribution of Barnett Shale Using Nitrogen Adsorption Data[D].United States:University of Oklahoma,2012.
    [7]Ross D J K,Bustin R M.The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26:916-927.
    [8]Kwon O,Kronenberg A K,Gangi A F,et al.Permeability of illite-bearing shale:Anisotropy and effects of clay content and loading[J].Journal of Geophysical research,2004,109(B10):205-223.
    [9]Milner M,McLin R,Petriello J,et al.Imaging Texture and Porosity in Mudstones and Shales:Comparison of Secondary and Ion-Milled Backscattre SEM Methods[C].Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference,19-21October,Calgary,Alberta,Canada.SPE138975.2010.
    [10]Aplin A C,Macquaker J H S.Mudstone diversity:Origin and implications for source,seal,and reservoir properties in petroleum systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2031-2059.
    [11]Kale S V,Rai C S,Sondergeld C H.Petrophysical Characterization of Barnett Shale[C].SPE Unconventional Gas Conference,23-25 February,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,USA.SPE131770.
    [12]Chalmers G R,Bustin R M,Power I M.Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry,pycnometry,surface area,and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses:Examples from the Barnett,Woodford,Haynesville,Marcellus,and Doig units[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1099-1119.
    [13]Zeng Qiunan,Yu Bingsong,Li Yufei.Reservoir characteristics and control factors in the shale bed of Yanchang Formation of southeast in Ordos Basin[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2013,20(1):23-26.[曾秋楠,于炳松,李昱霏.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组页岩储层特征及控制因素[J].特种油气藏,2013,20(1):23-26.]
    [14]Er Chuang,Zhao Jingzhou,Bai Yubin,et al.Reservoir characteristics of the organic-rich shales of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2013,34(5):708-715.[耳闯,赵靖舟,白玉彬,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组富有机质泥页岩储层特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(5):708-715.]
    [15]Liu Xiangjun,Xiong Jian,Liang Lixi.Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of organic rich Yanchang Formation shale in central China by nitrogen adsorption/desorption analysis[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2015,22:62-72.
    [16]Fang Changliang,Amro Mohammed.Pore structure characteristics of non-marine shale in Ordos Basin China[C].International petroleum Technology conference,IPTC17419.
    [17]Tang Xuan,Zhang Jinchuan,Wang Xiangzeng,et al.Shale characteristics in the southeastern Ordos Basin,China:Implications for hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and the potential of continental shales[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2014,128/129:32-46.
    [18]Rokosh C D,Lyster S,Anderson S D A,et al.Summary of Alberta’s Shale-and Siltstone-hosted Hydrocarbon Resource Potential[R].Alberta Geological Survey.Open File Report2012-06.[2013-12-06].http://www.ags.gov.ab.ca/publications/abstracts/OFR_2012_06.html
    [19]Aplin A C,Macquaker J H S.Mudstone diversity:Origin and implications for source,seal,and reservoir properties in petroleum systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2031-2059.
    [20]Rokosh D,Pawlowicz J,Anderson S,et al.Shale Fabric,Mineralogy and Effective Porosity of the Upper Colorado Group[C].Alberta:CSPG CSEG CWLS Convention,2009:572-576.
    [21]Broadhead R F.Petrography and reservoir geology of Upper Devonian shales,Northern Ohio[C]//Roen J B,Kepferle R C.Petroleum Geology of the Devonian and Mississipian Black Shale Of Easten North America.U.S.Geological Survey Bulletin,1989,1909:H1-H15.
    [22]Jiang Chenfu,Wang Xiangzeng,Zhang Lixia,et al.Geological characteristics of shale and exploration potential of continental shale gas in 7th member of Yanchang Formation,southeast Ordos Basin[J].Geology in China,2013,20(6):1880-1888.[姜呈馥,王香增,张丽霞,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组长7段陆相页岩气地质特征及勘探潜力评价[J].中国地质,2013,20(6):1880-1888.]
    [23]Cheng Ming,Luo Xiaorong,Lei Yuhong,et al.The distribution,fractal characteristic and thickness estimation of silty laminae and beds in Zhangjiatan shale,Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(5):845-854.[程明,罗晓容,雷裕红,等.鄂尔多斯盆地张家滩页岩粉砂质夹层/纹层分布、分形特征和估算方法研究[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(5):845-854.]
    [24]Lei Yuhong,Luo Xiaorong,Wang Xiangzeng,et al.Characteristics of silty laminae in Zhangjiatan shale of southeastern Ordos Basin,China:Implications for shale gas formation[J].AAPG Bulletin,2015,99(4):661-687.
    [25]Melissa Vallee.Petrophysical Evaluation of Lacustrine Shales in the Cooper Basin,Australia:Search and Discovery[C].Pittsburgh:AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition,2013:19-22.
    [26]Yang Junjie.Structural Evolution and Hydrocarbon Distribution Law in OrdosBasin[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2002.[杨俊杰.鄂尔多斯盆地构造演化与油气分布规律[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002.]
    [27]Bai Yubin,Zhao Jingzhou,Fang Zhaoqiang,et al.Control effect of high-quality source rocks on petroleum accumulation in Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Natural Science Edition,2012,27(2):1-5.[白玉彬,赵靖舟,方朝强,等.优质烃源岩对鄂尔多斯盆地延长组石油聚集的控制作用[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2012,27(2):1-5.]
    [28]Chen Quanhong,Li Wenhou,Gao Yongxiang,et al.The deeplake deposit in the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin,China and its significance for oil-gas accumulation[J].Science in China:Series D,2007,37(supplement1):39-48.[陈全红,李文厚,高永祥,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组深湖沉积与油气聚集意义[J].中国科学:D辑,2007,37(增刊1):39-48.]
    [29]Liu Huaqing,Yuan Jiangying,Li Xiangbo,et al.Lake basin evolution of Ordos Basin during Middle-Late Triassic and its origin analysis[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(1):52-56.[刘化清,袁剑英,李相博.鄂尔多斯盆地延长期湖盆演化及其成因分析[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):52-56.]
    [30]Li Wenhou,Pang Jungang,Cao Hongxia,et al.Depositional system and paleogeographic evolution of the Late Triassic Yanchang stage in Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Northwest University:Natural Science Edition,2009,39(3):501-506.[李文厚,庞军刚,曹红霞,等.鄂尔多斯盆地晚三叠世延长期沉积体系及岩相古地理演化[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,2009,39(3):501-506]
    [31]Zhang Yeyu,Zhou Wen,Tang Yu,et al.Characteristics of shale reservoir rocks in Member 7of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science&Technology Edition,2013,40(6):671-676.[张烨毓,周文,唐瑜,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7油层组页岩储层特征[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,40(6):671-676.]
    [32]Miskimines J L,Barree R D.Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Height Containment in Laminated Sand and Shale Sequences[C].SPE Production and Operations Symposium,23-26March,Oklahoma City,Oklahoma.SPE 80935,2003.
    [33]Comisky J T,Santiago M,McCollom B,et al.Sample Size Effects on the Application of Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure for Determining the Storage Capacity of Tight Gas and Oil Shales[C].Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference,15-17 November,Calgary,Alberta,Canada.SPE149432.2011.
    [34]Handwerger D A,Suarez-Rivera R,Kelly I,et al.Methods Improve Shale Core Analysis(R).The American Oil&Gas Reporter,Special Report:Well Stimulation&Completion Technology,2012.
    [35]Handwerger A,Suarez-Rivera R,Vaughn K I,et al.Improved Petrophysical Core Measurements on Tight Shale Reservoirs Using Retort and Crushed Samples[C].SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,30October-2November,Denver,Colorado,USA.SPE147456.2011.
    [36]Loucks R G,Ruppel S,Reed R M,et al.Origin and Classification of Pores in Mudstones from Shale-Gas Systems[C].Search and Discovery Article,2011AAPG International Conference and Exhibition,Milan,Italy.2011.
    [37]Jiao Kun,Yao Suping,Wu Hao,et al.Advances in characterization of pore system of gas shales[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2014,20(1):151-161.[焦堃,姚素平,吴浩,等.页岩气储层孔隙系统表征方法研究进展[J].高校地质学报,2014,20(1):151-161.]
    [38]Bustin R M,Bustin A M,Cui X,et al.Impact of Shale Properties on Pore Structure and Storage Characteristics[C].SPE Shale Gas Production Conference,16-18 November,Fort Worth,Texas,USA.SPE119892.2008.
    [39]Utpalendu K,Manika P.Understanding Pore-structure and Permeability in Shales[C].SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,30 October-2 November,Denver,Colorado,USA.SPE146869.2011.
    [40]Barrett E P,Joyner L G,Halenda P P.The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances:I.Computations form nitrogen isotherms[J].Journal of the American Chemical Society,1951,73(1):373-380.
    [41]Unger K K,Tanaka N,Machtejevas E.Monolithic Silicas in Separation Science:Concepts,Syntheses,Characterization,Modeling and Applications[M].Belin:Wiley,2010:54-55.
    [42]Edward W W.The dynamics of capillary flow[J].Physical Review,1921,17(3):273.
    [43]Xie Xiaoyong,Tang Hongming,Wang Chunhua,et al.Comparison between N2adsorption and mercury injection in pore structure analysis of shale[J].Natural Gas Industry,2006,26(12):1-3.[谢晓永,唐洪明,王春华,等.氮气吸附法和压汞法在测试泥页岩孔径分布中的对比[J].天然气工业,2006,26(12):1-3.]
    [44]Gao Zhiye,Hu Qinhong.Estimating permeability using median pore-throat radius obtained from mercury intrusion porosimetry[J].Journal of Geophysics and Engineering,2013,10:1-7.
    [45]Dullien F A L.New network permeability model of porous media[J].AlChE Journal,1975,21(2):299-307.
    [46]Daniel M J,Ronald J H,Tim E R,et al.Unconventional shalegas systems:The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700