数据网络中中文名称规范档的建设与发展
|
摘要
[目的/意义]名称规范档在书目数据库中对书目记录的检索点进行规范化校验,通过实现标目的一致性,达到检索效率提升、目录汇集的目的。分析国外名称规范档的最新研究进展及实践,以期为中文名称规范档的发展研究提供借鉴。[方法/过程]通过对当前中文名称规范档建设存在的问题进行客观分析,结合国外名称规范档的研究进展及实践,提出中文名称规范档的建设发展方向。[结果/结论]当前中文名称规范档的建设存在着数据规模小、数据完全性差、数据共享性低问题,从国外名称规范档的发展看出,其不再局限于图书馆内部建设,开始向合作共建共享发展,规范数据不再面向OPAC系统,向开放互联发展。因此中文名称规范档的建设可从共建共享、构建新模型与规则、提升质量方面着手,发挥中文名称规范档在网络环境下的规范控制作用。
[Purpose/significance]The semantic web is the web of data,which provides a uniform framework of allowing data sharing and reuse. Data from different sources are described in the uniform format and linked with the outside world in order to achieve data integrated applications across organizations and platforms. In this context,the cataloging environment is changing with associated bibliographic resources and RDA's advent,which makes bibliographic data from closed to open. Authority files can be added to catalog records by achieving consistency purposes. Thus,it will aggregate catalogs and improve the retrieval efficiency. The analysis of the development of researches and practices in the name authority file at home and abroad provides meaningful references for Chinese name authority files. [Method/process] The paper discussed the problems of the construction of Chinese name authority files and has analyzed the development of researches and practices in the name authority file at home and abroad focusing on the development direction of the construction of Chinese name authority files. [Result/conclusion]There are some issues such as small data size,poor data integrity,low data-sharing in the Chinese authority files. From the development of foreign authority files perspective,it is no longer confined within the library and develops to cooperate and share with the outside. It is no longer facing the OPAC system but develops to the open linked Internet. Therefore,the construction of Chinese name authority files can be obtained from sharing files,building a new model and rules,and improving the quality,which plays a role in standardizing and controlling the Chinese name authority files in the network environment.
[Purpose/significance]The semantic web is the web of data,which provides a uniform framework of allowing data sharing and reuse. Data from different sources are described in the uniform format and linked with the outside world in order to achieve data integrated applications across organizations and platforms. In this context,the cataloging environment is changing with associated bibliographic resources and RDA's advent,which makes bibliographic data from closed to open. Authority files can be added to catalog records by achieving consistency purposes. Thus,it will aggregate catalogs and improve the retrieval efficiency. The analysis of the development of researches and practices in the name authority file at home and abroad provides meaningful references for Chinese name authority files. [Method/process] The paper discussed the problems of the construction of Chinese name authority files and has analyzed the development of researches and practices in the name authority file at home and abroad focusing on the development direction of the construction of Chinese name authority files. [Result/conclusion]There are some issues such as small data size,poor data integrity,low data-sharing in the Chinese authority files. From the development of foreign authority files perspective,it is no longer confined within the library and develops to cooperate and share with the outside. It is no longer facing the OPAC system but develops to the open linked Internet. Therefore,the construction of Chinese name authority files can be obtained from sharing files,building a new model and rules,and improving the quality,which plays a role in standardizing and controlling the Chinese name authority files in the network environment.
引文
[1]刘炜,张春景,夏翠娟.万维网时代的规范控制[J].中国图书馆学报,2015,41(3):22-33.
[2]ZHANG S L.Planning an authority control project at a mediumsized university library[J].College&research libraries,2001,62(5):395-405.
[3]王彦侨,王广平.中文名称规范数据的维护与整合[J].图书馆杂志,2017(2):56-59.
[4]王冠华.国家图书馆与CALIS中文名称标目选取原则及规范形式的差异[J].图书馆建设,2010(6):57-60.
[5]Library of Congress.On the record:report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the future of bibliographic control[EB/OL].[2016-03-15].http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-ontherecord-jan08-final.pdf.
[6]International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions.Functional requirements for bibliographic records[EB/OL].[2016-01-15].http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf.
[7]IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records(FRANAR).Functional requirements for authority data a conceptual mode[EB/OL].[2016-03-15].http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frad/frad_2013.pdf.
[8]International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions.Functional requirements for subject authority data(FRSAD)a conceptual model[EB/OL].[2016-03-15].http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/classification-and-indexing/functional-requirements-for-subject-authority-data/frsad-final-report.pdf.
[9]Library of Congress.Bibliographic framework as a Web of data:linked data model and supporting services[EB/OL].[2016-03-15].http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/pdf/marcld-report-11-21-2012.pdf.
[10]ZENG L M,ZUMER M.Introducing FRSAD and mapping it with SKOS and other models[J].International cataloguing and bibliographic control,2010,39(3):53-56.
[11]DUNSIRE G,WILLER M.Standard library metadata models and structures for the semantic Web[J].Library hi tech news,2011,28(3):1-12.
[12]BAKER T,COYLE K,PETIYA S.Multi-entity models of resource description in the semantic Web:a comparison of FRBR,RDA and BIBFRAME[J].Library hi tech,2014,32(4):562-582.
[13]TANIGUCHI S.Event-aware FRBR and FRAD models:are they useful?[J].Journal of documentation,2013,69(3):452-472.
[14]The library of Congress.Resource description and access(RDA)[EB/OL].[2016-03-15].http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/.
[15]KIORGAARD D,HUTHWAITE A.Authority control in AARC3[C/OL].[2016-10-18].http://www.nla.gov.au/openpublish/index.php/nlasp/article/view/1227/1512.
[16]DANSKIN A.Linked and open data:RDA and bibliographic control[J].JLIS it,2013,4(1):147.
[17]Library Linked Data Incubator Group final report[EB/OL].[2016-04-18].http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/XGR-lld-20111025/.
[18]Library of Congress.RDA authority records[EB/OL].[2016-07-28].http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/source/nars.doc.
[19]Library of Congress.Summary of programmatic changes to the LC/NACO authority file:what LC-PCC RDA catalogers need to know[EB/OL].[2016-05-20].http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/lcnaf_rdaphase.pdf.
[20]LEIVA-MEDEROS A,SENSO J A,DOMINGUEZ-VELASCO S,et al.AUTHORIS:a tool for authority control in the semantic Web[J].Library hi tech,2013,31(3):536-553.
[21]YAN Y L,YANG S Q.Organizing bibliographical data with RDA:how far have we stridden toward the semantic Web?[M].West Yorkshire:Emerald Group Publishing Limited,2013.
[22]ANAHTAR S.Bibliographic data towards the semantic Web:a review of key issues and recent experiences[J].Bilgi Dünyas,2012,13(1):17-56.
[23]PEPONAKIS、M.Libraries’metadata as data in the era of the semantic Web:modeling a repository of master theses and Ph D dissertations for the Web of data[J].Journal of library metadata,2013,13(4):330-348.
[24]SIMON A,WENA R,MICHEL V,et al.Publishing bibliographic records on the Web of data:opportunities for the Bn F(French National Library)[M]//The semantic web:semantics and big data.Heidelberg:Springer,2013:563-577.
[25]BRUCE D,FRéDéRc ICK G.Bibliographic ontology specification[EB/OL].[2014-06-13].http://bibliontology.com/#sec-intro.
[26]KEβLER M.Linked open data of the German National Llibrary[C/OL].[2016-11-20].http://www.eco4r.org/workshop2010/eco4r_workshop2010_mirjam_kessler.pdf.
[27]KURKI J,HYVONEN E.Authority control of people and organizations on the semantic Web[J].Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians,2009,60(2):180-199.
[2]ZHANG S L.Planning an authority control project at a mediumsized university library[J].College&research libraries,2001,62(5):395-405.
[3]王彦侨,王广平.中文名称规范数据的维护与整合[J].图书馆杂志,2017(2):56-59.
[4]王冠华.国家图书馆与CALIS中文名称标目选取原则及规范形式的差异[J].图书馆建设,2010(6):57-60.
[5]Library of Congress.On the record:report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the future of bibliographic control[EB/OL].[2016-03-15].http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-ontherecord-jan08-final.pdf.
[6]International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions.Functional requirements for bibliographic records[EB/OL].[2016-01-15].http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf.
[7]IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records(FRANAR).Functional requirements for authority data a conceptual mode[EB/OL].[2016-03-15].http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frad/frad_2013.pdf.
[8]International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions.Functional requirements for subject authority data(FRSAD)a conceptual model[EB/OL].[2016-03-15].http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/classification-and-indexing/functional-requirements-for-subject-authority-data/frsad-final-report.pdf.
[9]Library of Congress.Bibliographic framework as a Web of data:linked data model and supporting services[EB/OL].[2016-03-15].http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/pdf/marcld-report-11-21-2012.pdf.
[10]ZENG L M,ZUMER M.Introducing FRSAD and mapping it with SKOS and other models[J].International cataloguing and bibliographic control,2010,39(3):53-56.
[11]DUNSIRE G,WILLER M.Standard library metadata models and structures for the semantic Web[J].Library hi tech news,2011,28(3):1-12.
[12]BAKER T,COYLE K,PETIYA S.Multi-entity models of resource description in the semantic Web:a comparison of FRBR,RDA and BIBFRAME[J].Library hi tech,2014,32(4):562-582.
[13]TANIGUCHI S.Event-aware FRBR and FRAD models:are they useful?[J].Journal of documentation,2013,69(3):452-472.
[14]The library of Congress.Resource description and access(RDA)[EB/OL].[2016-03-15].http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/.
[15]KIORGAARD D,HUTHWAITE A.Authority control in AARC3[C/OL].[2016-10-18].http://www.nla.gov.au/openpublish/index.php/nlasp/article/view/1227/1512.
[16]DANSKIN A.Linked and open data:RDA and bibliographic control[J].JLIS it,2013,4(1):147.
[17]Library Linked Data Incubator Group final report[EB/OL].[2016-04-18].http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/XGR-lld-20111025/.
[18]Library of Congress.RDA authority records[EB/OL].[2016-07-28].http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/source/nars.doc.
[19]Library of Congress.Summary of programmatic changes to the LC/NACO authority file:what LC-PCC RDA catalogers need to know[EB/OL].[2016-05-20].http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/lcnaf_rdaphase.pdf.
[20]LEIVA-MEDEROS A,SENSO J A,DOMINGUEZ-VELASCO S,et al.AUTHORIS:a tool for authority control in the semantic Web[J].Library hi tech,2013,31(3):536-553.
[21]YAN Y L,YANG S Q.Organizing bibliographical data with RDA:how far have we stridden toward the semantic Web?[M].West Yorkshire:Emerald Group Publishing Limited,2013.
[22]ANAHTAR S.Bibliographic data towards the semantic Web:a review of key issues and recent experiences[J].Bilgi Dünyas,2012,13(1):17-56.
[23]PEPONAKIS、M.Libraries’metadata as data in the era of the semantic Web:modeling a repository of master theses and Ph D dissertations for the Web of data[J].Journal of library metadata,2013,13(4):330-348.
[24]SIMON A,WENA R,MICHEL V,et al.Publishing bibliographic records on the Web of data:opportunities for the Bn F(French National Library)[M]//The semantic web:semantics and big data.Heidelberg:Springer,2013:563-577.
[25]BRUCE D,FRéDéRc ICK G.Bibliographic ontology specification[EB/OL].[2014-06-13].http://bibliontology.com/#sec-intro.
[26]KEβLER M.Linked open data of the German National Llibrary[C/OL].[2016-11-20].http://www.eco4r.org/workshop2010/eco4r_workshop2010_mirjam_kessler.pdf.
[27]KURKI J,HYVONEN E.Authority control of people and organizations on the semantic Web[J].Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians,2009,60(2):180-199.