权力距离感对“生命礼物”赠予的影响
|
摘要
血液作为"生命礼物",能否保质保量地及时供应,直接关乎需血患者的生命安全。在血液供求基本持平的情况下,近年来中国局部性的"血荒"频频发生。破解"血荒"困局,保障血液供给和血液安全,已经成为影响国民身体健康和生命安全的重要社会问题。基于个体文化价值观视角,运用实验和调查研究方法,探究个体权力距离感对献血动机和献血意愿的影响及其内在机制和边界条件。研究1和研究3采用实验方法,以高校学生作为被试。研究2采用调查研究方法,以社会人士(非学生)作为被试。研究1操控个体的权力距离感,实验检验权力距离感对献血动机和献血意愿的影响;研究2剖析权力距离感对献血动机和献血意愿影响的内在机制;研究3实验检验权力距离感对献血动机和献血意愿影响的边界条件。研究1通过实验启动的方式临时操控个体的权力距离感,发现个体权力距离感与献血动机和献血意愿显著负相关。研究2的调查结果表明,对于非学生被试,个体权力距离感对献血动机和献血意愿的负向影响依然显著;中介效应检验结果表明感知责任起部分中介作用,Bootstrap法统计结果表明感知责任对献血动机和献血意愿的间接效应分别为-0. 147和-0. 172。研究3通过实验的方式操控个体对采供血组织的感知信任,发现在个体对采供血组织感知信任度低时,权力距离感对献血动机和献血意愿具有显著的负向影响;但在感知信任程度高时,权力距离感对献血动机和献血意愿的影响并不显著。研究结果从个体视角验证了权力距离感显著负向影响献血行为,厘清了其影响机理和边界条件,具有一定的理论意义。采供血组织应该提高自身的社会公信力,并侧重发布可以激发个体感知责任的宣传信息,以招募无偿献血志愿者,扩大献血者群体。
As a"gift of life",whether the blood can be supplied in a timely manner is directly related to life safety of the patients. In the case of the basic balance of blood supply and blood demand,the regional"blood shortage"in China has frequently occurred in recent years. Solving the"blood shortage"and keeping the blood supply sufficient and safe have become an important social problem which is affecting the health and life safety of the national people.From the perspective of individual cultural values,this study,by using the method of experiment and survey research,explores the effect of the power distance belief on the blood donation intention and blood donation willingness as well as its internal mechanism and boundary conditions. The first study and the third study use the method of experiment and recruit college students as subjects while the second study uses the method of survey research and recruit non-student as subjects.The experiment of the first study temporarily manipulates individual's power distance belief by method of experimental priming,and finds that individual power distance belief is significantly negative correlated with the blood donation intention and blood donation willingness. The survey of the second study reveals that the negative correlation between power distance belief and blood donation intention and blood donation willingness is still significant for non-student subjects; Importantly,the perceived responsibility is partly mediated the power distance belief and blood donation behavior,and the results of the Bootstrap statistics show that the indirect effect of perceived responsibility on blood donation intention and blood donation willingness is-0. 147 and-0. 172 respectively. The experiment of the third study manipulates individual perception trust about the blood collection agencies,and finds that when the individual perception trust is low,the negative effect of the power distance belief on blood donation intention and blood donation willingness is significant; while it is not significant when individual perceived trust about the blood collection agencies is high.This study has certain theoretical contributions by demonstrating power distance belief has a significantly negative influence on the blood donation behavior from the individual point of view,and clarifying the influence of internal mechanism and boundary conditions. This study also indicates that blood donation agency can recruit blood donation volunteer as well as expand the voluntary blood donation volunteer group by improving its own social credibility and focusing on the dissemination of information that can stimulate the individual perception responsibility.
As a"gift of life",whether the blood can be supplied in a timely manner is directly related to life safety of the patients. In the case of the basic balance of blood supply and blood demand,the regional"blood shortage"in China has frequently occurred in recent years. Solving the"blood shortage"and keeping the blood supply sufficient and safe have become an important social problem which is affecting the health and life safety of the national people.From the perspective of individual cultural values,this study,by using the method of experiment and survey research,explores the effect of the power distance belief on the blood donation intention and blood donation willingness as well as its internal mechanism and boundary conditions. The first study and the third study use the method of experiment and recruit college students as subjects while the second study uses the method of survey research and recruit non-student as subjects.The experiment of the first study temporarily manipulates individual's power distance belief by method of experimental priming,and finds that individual power distance belief is significantly negative correlated with the blood donation intention and blood donation willingness. The survey of the second study reveals that the negative correlation between power distance belief and blood donation intention and blood donation willingness is still significant for non-student subjects; Importantly,the perceived responsibility is partly mediated the power distance belief and blood donation behavior,and the results of the Bootstrap statistics show that the indirect effect of perceived responsibility on blood donation intention and blood donation willingness is-0. 147 and-0. 172 respectively. The experiment of the third study manipulates individual perception trust about the blood collection agencies,and finds that when the individual perception trust is low,the negative effect of the power distance belief on blood donation intention and blood donation willingness is significant; while it is not significant when individual perceived trust about the blood collection agencies is high.This study has certain theoretical contributions by demonstrating power distance belief has a significantly negative influence on the blood donation behavior from the individual point of view,and clarifying the influence of internal mechanism and boundary conditions. This study also indicates that blood donation agency can recruit blood donation volunteer as well as expand the voluntary blood donation volunteer group by improving its own social credibility and focusing on the dissemination of information that can stimulate the individual perception responsibility.
引文
[1]余成普.生命的礼物:读蒂特马斯《礼物关系:从人血到社会政策》.社会学研究,2010,25(1):228-242.YU Chengpu. Gift of life:reading R. M. Titmuss《the gift relationship:from human blood to social policy》. Sociological Studies,2010,25(1):228-242.(in Chinese)
[2] TITMUSS R M. The gift relationship:from human blood to social policy. New York:Pantheon,1970:256-300.
[3] LEMMENS K P,ABRAHAM C,HOEKSTRA T,et al. Why don't young people volunteer to give blood? An investigation of the correlates of donation intentions among young nondonors. Transfusion,2005,45(6):945-955.
[4] SOJKA B N,SOJKA P. The blood-donation experience:perceived physical,psychological and social impact of blood donation on the donor. Vox Sanguinis,2003,84(2):120-128.
[5] FERGUSON E,FARRELL K,LAWRENCE C. Blood donation is an act of benevolence rather than altruism. Health Psychology,2008,27(3):327-336.
[6] FERGUSON E,TAYLOR M J,KEATLEY D,et al. Blood donors'helping behavior is driven by warm glow:more evidence for the blood donor benevolence hypothesis. Transfusion,2012,52(10):2189-2200.
[7] ZELIZER V A. The social meaning of money:“special monies”.American Journal of Sociology,1989,95(2):342-377.
[8] EASTLUND T. Monetary blood donation incentives and the risk of transfusion-transmitted infection. Transfusion,1998,38(9):874-882.
[9] MELLSTRM C,JOHANNESSON M. Crowding out in blood donation:was Titmuss right?. Journal of the European Economic Association,2008,6(4):845-863.
[10] LACETERA N,MACIS M. Do all material incentives for prosocial activities backfire? The response to cash and non-cash incentives for blood donations. Journal of Economic Psychology,2010,31(4):738-748.
[11] LACETERA N,MACIS M. Time for blood:the effect of paid leave legislation on altruistic behavior. The Journal of Law,Economics,&Organization,2013,29(6):1384-1420.
[12] LACETERA N,MACIS M,SLONIM R. Rewarding volunteers:a field experiment. Management Science,2014,60(5):1107-1129.
[13]LACETERA N,MACIS M,SLONIM R. Economic rewards to motivate blood donations. Science,2013,340(6135):927-928.
[14] DHINGRA N. In defense of WHO's blood donation policy.Science,2013,342(6159):691-692.
[15] LACETERA N,MACIS M,SLONIM R. The value of incentives in blood donation-response. Science,2013,341(6142):129.
[16]陈良勇,马祖军.无偿献血者流失行为影响机制研究.管理评论,2015,27(11):151-160.CHEN Liangyong,MA Zujun. Churn determinants of non-remunerated blood donors. Management Review,2015,27(11):151-160.(in Chinese)
[17]余成普.单位团体献血运作的过程与机制:以北京市T大学为个案.社会,2010,30(2):116-143.YU Chengpu. The operation process and mechanism of group blood donation in danwei:a case study of University T in Beijing. Chinese Journal of Sociology,2010,30(2):116-143.(in Chinese)
[18]李翠莹,游协丹,练栩辉,等.大学生无偿献血认知及动机调查分析.中国输血杂志,2013,26(9):786-787.LI Cuiying,YOU Xiedan,LIAN Xuhui,et al. Study on the cognition and motivation of blood donation in college students. Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion,2013,26(9):786-787.(in Chinese)
[19]郑荣刚,张鸣弟,靖春旭.影响无偿献血因素的调查.中国输血杂志,2014,27(11):1236-1238.ZHENG Ronggang,ZHANG Mingdi,JING Chunxu. An investigation of factors that effected unpaid blood donation. Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion,2014,27(11):1236-1238.(in Chinese)
[20]宫本兰,高勇,于淼,等.献血者服务满意度调查分析.中国输血杂志,2015,28(11):1399-1400.GONG Benlan,GAO Yong,YU Miao,et al. Analysis on the survey for blood donors'satisfaction. Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion,2015,28(11):1399-1400.(in Chinese)
[21]俞新天.中国文化价值观的构建与传播.国际问题研究,2011(6):5-19.YU Xintian. The construction and spread of Chinese cultural value. International Studies,2011(6):5-19.(in Chinese)
[22]潘煜,高丽,张星,等.中国文化背景下的消费者价值观研究:量表开发与比较.管理世界,2014(4):90-106.PAN Yu,GAO Li,ZHANG Xing,et al. Research on consumer values in the context of Chinese culture:scale development and comparison. Management World,2014(4):90-106.(in Chinese)
[23] DE KORT W,WAGENMANS E,VAN DONGEN A,et al.Blood product collection and supply:a matter of money?.Vox Sanguinis,2010,98(3):e201-e208.
[24] HOFSTEDE G. Hierarchical power distance in forty countries∥LAMMERS C J,HICKSON D J. Organizations Alike and Unlike. London:Routledge and Kegan Paul,2013:97-119.
[25] HOFSTEDE G. Culture's consequences:comparing values,behaviors,institutions and organizations across nations.2 nd ed. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage Publications,2001:87-126.
[26] KELTNER D,GRUENFELD D H,ANDERSON C. Power,approach,and inhibition. Psychological Review,2003,110(2):265-284.
[27]KIRKMAN B L,SHAPIRO D L. The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams:the mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(3):557-569.
[28] ANDERSON C,JOHN O P,KELTNER D. The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality,2012,80(2):313-344.
[29] FARH J L,HACKETT R D,LIANG J. Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational supportemployee outcome relationships in China:comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(3):715-729.
[30] ZHANG Y L,WINTERICH K P,MITTAL V. Power distance belief and impulsive buying. Journal of Marketing Research,2010,47(5):945-954.
[31]周建涛,廖建桥.权力距离导向与员工建言:组织地位感知的影响.管理科学,2012,25(1):35-44.ZHOU Jiantao,LIAO Jianqiao. Effects of perceived organizational status on the relationship between power distance orientation and employee voice. Journal of Management Science,2012,25(1):35-44.(in Chinese)
[32]张燕红,廖建桥.团队真实型领导、新员工反馈寻求行为与社会化结果.管理科学,2015,28(2):126-136.ZHANG Yanhong,LIAO Jianqiao. Team authentic leadership,newcomer feedback-seeking behavior and socialization outcomes. Journal of Management Science,2015,28(2):126-136.(in Chinese)
[33]马粤娴,严鸣,黄国华.团队群体性组织偏差行为的产生机制.管理科学,2016,29(3):59-70.MA Yuexian,YAN Ming,HUANG Guohua. The formation of group collective organizational deviance. Journal of Management Science,2016,29(3):59-70.(in Chinese)
[34]郑晓明,刘鑫.互动公平对员工幸福感的影响:心理授权的中介作用与权力距离的调节作用.心理学报,2016,48(6):693-709.ZHENG Xiaoming,LIU Xin. The effect of interactional justice on employee well-being:the mediating role of psychological empowerment and the moderating role of power distance. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2016,48(6):693-709.(in Chinese)
[35]韦慧民,龙立荣.认知与情感信任、权力距离感和制度控制对领导授权行为的影响研究.管理工程学报,2011,25(1):10-17.WEI Huimin,LONG Lirong. The effect of cognition-and effect-based trust,power distance and system control on leader empowering behavior. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2011,25(1):10-17.(in Chinese)
[36]唐汉瑛,龙立荣,周如意.谦卑领导行为与下属工作投入:有中介的调节模型.管理科学,2015,28(3):77-89.TANG Hanying,LONG Lirong,ZHOU Ruyi. Humble leadership behavior and subordinates'work engagement:a mediated moderation model. Journal of Management Science,2015,28(3):77-89.(in Chinese)
[37] YOO B,DONTHU N,LENARTOWICZ T. Measuring Hofstede's five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level:development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing,2011,23(3/4):193-210.
[38] LIAN H W,FERRIS D L,BROWN D J. Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology,2012,97(1):107-123.
[39] BOTERO I C,DYNE L V. Employee voice behavior:interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly,2009,23(1):84-104.
[40] BLODGETT J,LU L C,ROSE G M,et al. Ethical sensitivity to stakeholder interests:a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2001,29(2):190-202.
[41] LIN W P,WANG L,CHEN S T. Abusive supervision and employee well-being:the moderating effect of power distance orientation. Applied Psychology,2013,62(2):308-329.
[42]WINTERICH K P,ZHANG Y L. Accepting inequality deters responsibility:how power distance decreases charitable behavior.Journal of Consumer Research,2014,41(2):274-293.
[43] HAN D,LALWANI A K,DUHACHEK A. Power distance belief,power,and charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research,2017,44(1):182-195.
[44] FEHR E,SCHMIDT K M. A theory of fairness,competition,and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1999,114(3):817-868.
[45] FERGUSON E. Mechanism of altruism approach to blood donor recruitment and retention:a review and future directions.Transfusion Medicine,2015,25(4):211-226.
[46] FRANCE C R,KOWALSKY J M,FRANCE J L,et al. The blood donor identity survey:a multidimensional measure of blood donor motivations. Transfusion,2014,54(8):2098-2105.
[47] BEDNALL T C,BOVE L L,CHEETHAM A,et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of antecedents of blood donation behavior and intentions. Social Science&Medicine,2013,96:86-94.
[48]WHITE K M,POULSEN B E,HYDE M K. Identity and personality influences on donating money,time,and blood. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,2016,46(2):372-394.
[49] MASSER B M,WHITE K M,HYDE M K,et al. Predicting blood donation intentions and behavior among Australian blood donors:testing an extended theory of planned behavior model. Transfusion,2009,49(2):320-329.
[50] LEE S,WINTERICH K P,ROSS W T. I'm moral,but I won't help you:the distinct roles of empathy and justice in donations. Journal of Consumer Research,2014,41(3):678-696.
[51] ERLANDSSON A,BJRKLUND F,BCKSTRM M. Emotional reactions,perceived impact and perceived responsibility mediate the identifiable victim effect,proportion dominance effect and in-group effect respectively. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2015,127:1-14.
[52] ERLANDSSON A,JUNGSTRAND A,VSTFJLL D. Anticipated guilt for not helping and anticipated warm glow for helping are differently impacted by personal responsibility to help. Frontiers in Psychology,2016,7:1-19.
[53] HEALY K. Embedded altruism:blood collection regimes and the European Union's donor population. American Journal of Sociology,2000,105(6):1633-1657.
[54] SHEHU E,BECKER J U,LANGMAACK A C,et al. The brand personality of nonprofit organizations and the influence of monetary incentives. Journal of Business Ethics,2016,138(3):589-600.
[55] VENABLE B T,ROSE G M,BUSH V D,et al. The role of brand personality in charitable giving:an assessment and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2005,33(3):295-312.
[56]侯俊东,杜兰英.影响个人捐赠决策的感知特性及其维度结构:基于中国的实证经验.公共管理学报,2011,8(2):109-118.HOU Jundong,DU Lanying. Perceptual characteristics and its dimension structure influencing individual donation decision:based on Chinese empirical evidence. Journal of Public Management,2011,8(2):109-118.(in Chinese)
[57]蒋晶.影响我国个人捐赠者捐赠决策过程的心理机制:基于情感适应理论的实证研究.中国软科学,2014(6):44-57.JIANG Jing. The mechanism affecting donation decision making process:an emotional adaptation perspective. China Soft Science,2014(6):44-57.(in Chinese)
[58]苏媛媛,石国亮.居民慈善捐赠影响因素分析:基于全国五大城市的调查分析.社会科学研究,2014(3):111-115.SU Yuanyuan,SHI Guoliang. Analysis on the influence factors of the residents'charitable donation:based on the survey study of the five big cities in China. Social Science Research,2014(3):111-115.(in Chinese)
[59]韦夏,涂荣庭,周志民.“准忠诚计划”失败对顾客满意的影响.管理科学,2017,30(3):110-121.WEI Xia,TU Rungting,ZHOU Zhimin. Effect of the failed“quasi-loyalty program”on customer satisfaction. Journal of Management Science,2017,30(3):110-121.(in Chinese)
[60]聂春艳,宋晓兵,孟佳佳.环境气味对消费者产品评价和购买意向的影响研究.管理科学,2016,29(5):93-105.NIE Chunyan,SONG Xiaobing,MENG Jiajia. The influence of ambient scent on consumers'product evaluation and purchase intention. Journal of Management Science,2016,29(5):93-105.(in Chinese)
[61] WANG J X,GUO N,GUO X M,et al. Who donates blood at five ethnically and geographically diverse blood centers in China in 2008. Transfusion,2010,50(12):2686-2694.
[62] LI C Q,XIAO X P,YIN H M,et al. Prevalence and prevalence trends of transfusion transmissible infections among blood donors at four Chinese regional blood centers between2000 and 2010. Journal of Translational Medicine,2012,10(1):176-186.
[63] LEMMENS K P H,ABRAHAM C,RUITER R A C,et al.Modelling antecedents of blood donation motivation among non-donors of varying age and education. British Journal of Psychology,2010,100(1):71-90.
[64]温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展.心理科学进展,2014,22(5):731-745.WEN Zhonglin,YE Baojuan. Analyses of mediating effects:the development of methods and models. Advances in Psychological Science,2014,22(5):731-745.(in Chinese)
[65] HAYES A F. Introduction to mediation,moderation,and conditional process analysis. New York,NY:The Guilford Press,2013:89-136.
[66] SPILLER S A,FITZSIMONS G J,LYNCH J G,et al. Spotlights,floodlights,and the magic number zero:simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research,2013,50(2):277-288.
[67]方杰,温忠麟,梁东梅,等.基于多元回归的调节效应分析.心理科学,2015,38(3):715-720.FANG Jie,WEN Zhonglin,LIANG Dongmei,et al. Moderation effect analyses based on multiple liner regression. Journal of Psychological Science,2015,38(3):715-720.(in Chinese)
[68]刘海建.制度环境、组织冗余与捐赠行为差异:在华中外资企业捐赠动机对比研究.管理评论,2013,25(8):77-91.LIU Haijian. Institutional environment,organizational slack and behaviors difference:an empirical study of comparison between local and foreign donor's motivation. Management Review,2013,25(8):77-91.(in Chinese)
[69]尹进,胡祥培,郑毅.基于主观逻辑方法的消费者多源信任融合模型.管理科学,2017,30(3):75-82.YIN Jin,HU Xiangpei,ZHENG Yi. Consumers'multi-source trust fusion model based on the subjective logic. Journal of Management Science,2017,30(3):75-82.(in Chinese)
[2] TITMUSS R M. The gift relationship:from human blood to social policy. New York:Pantheon,1970:256-300.
[3] LEMMENS K P,ABRAHAM C,HOEKSTRA T,et al. Why don't young people volunteer to give blood? An investigation of the correlates of donation intentions among young nondonors. Transfusion,2005,45(6):945-955.
[4] SOJKA B N,SOJKA P. The blood-donation experience:perceived physical,psychological and social impact of blood donation on the donor. Vox Sanguinis,2003,84(2):120-128.
[5] FERGUSON E,FARRELL K,LAWRENCE C. Blood donation is an act of benevolence rather than altruism. Health Psychology,2008,27(3):327-336.
[6] FERGUSON E,TAYLOR M J,KEATLEY D,et al. Blood donors'helping behavior is driven by warm glow:more evidence for the blood donor benevolence hypothesis. Transfusion,2012,52(10):2189-2200.
[7] ZELIZER V A. The social meaning of money:“special monies”.American Journal of Sociology,1989,95(2):342-377.
[8] EASTLUND T. Monetary blood donation incentives and the risk of transfusion-transmitted infection. Transfusion,1998,38(9):874-882.
[9] MELLSTRM C,JOHANNESSON M. Crowding out in blood donation:was Titmuss right?. Journal of the European Economic Association,2008,6(4):845-863.
[10] LACETERA N,MACIS M. Do all material incentives for prosocial activities backfire? The response to cash and non-cash incentives for blood donations. Journal of Economic Psychology,2010,31(4):738-748.
[11] LACETERA N,MACIS M. Time for blood:the effect of paid leave legislation on altruistic behavior. The Journal of Law,Economics,&Organization,2013,29(6):1384-1420.
[12] LACETERA N,MACIS M,SLONIM R. Rewarding volunteers:a field experiment. Management Science,2014,60(5):1107-1129.
[13]LACETERA N,MACIS M,SLONIM R. Economic rewards to motivate blood donations. Science,2013,340(6135):927-928.
[14] DHINGRA N. In defense of WHO's blood donation policy.Science,2013,342(6159):691-692.
[15] LACETERA N,MACIS M,SLONIM R. The value of incentives in blood donation-response. Science,2013,341(6142):129.
[16]陈良勇,马祖军.无偿献血者流失行为影响机制研究.管理评论,2015,27(11):151-160.CHEN Liangyong,MA Zujun. Churn determinants of non-remunerated blood donors. Management Review,2015,27(11):151-160.(in Chinese)
[17]余成普.单位团体献血运作的过程与机制:以北京市T大学为个案.社会,2010,30(2):116-143.YU Chengpu. The operation process and mechanism of group blood donation in danwei:a case study of University T in Beijing. Chinese Journal of Sociology,2010,30(2):116-143.(in Chinese)
[18]李翠莹,游协丹,练栩辉,等.大学生无偿献血认知及动机调查分析.中国输血杂志,2013,26(9):786-787.LI Cuiying,YOU Xiedan,LIAN Xuhui,et al. Study on the cognition and motivation of blood donation in college students. Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion,2013,26(9):786-787.(in Chinese)
[19]郑荣刚,张鸣弟,靖春旭.影响无偿献血因素的调查.中国输血杂志,2014,27(11):1236-1238.ZHENG Ronggang,ZHANG Mingdi,JING Chunxu. An investigation of factors that effected unpaid blood donation. Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion,2014,27(11):1236-1238.(in Chinese)
[20]宫本兰,高勇,于淼,等.献血者服务满意度调查分析.中国输血杂志,2015,28(11):1399-1400.GONG Benlan,GAO Yong,YU Miao,et al. Analysis on the survey for blood donors'satisfaction. Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion,2015,28(11):1399-1400.(in Chinese)
[21]俞新天.中国文化价值观的构建与传播.国际问题研究,2011(6):5-19.YU Xintian. The construction and spread of Chinese cultural value. International Studies,2011(6):5-19.(in Chinese)
[22]潘煜,高丽,张星,等.中国文化背景下的消费者价值观研究:量表开发与比较.管理世界,2014(4):90-106.PAN Yu,GAO Li,ZHANG Xing,et al. Research on consumer values in the context of Chinese culture:scale development and comparison. Management World,2014(4):90-106.(in Chinese)
[23] DE KORT W,WAGENMANS E,VAN DONGEN A,et al.Blood product collection and supply:a matter of money?.Vox Sanguinis,2010,98(3):e201-e208.
[24] HOFSTEDE G. Hierarchical power distance in forty countries∥LAMMERS C J,HICKSON D J. Organizations Alike and Unlike. London:Routledge and Kegan Paul,2013:97-119.
[25] HOFSTEDE G. Culture's consequences:comparing values,behaviors,institutions and organizations across nations.2 nd ed. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage Publications,2001:87-126.
[26] KELTNER D,GRUENFELD D H,ANDERSON C. Power,approach,and inhibition. Psychological Review,2003,110(2):265-284.
[27]KIRKMAN B L,SHAPIRO D L. The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams:the mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(3):557-569.
[28] ANDERSON C,JOHN O P,KELTNER D. The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality,2012,80(2):313-344.
[29] FARH J L,HACKETT R D,LIANG J. Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational supportemployee outcome relationships in China:comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(3):715-729.
[30] ZHANG Y L,WINTERICH K P,MITTAL V. Power distance belief and impulsive buying. Journal of Marketing Research,2010,47(5):945-954.
[31]周建涛,廖建桥.权力距离导向与员工建言:组织地位感知的影响.管理科学,2012,25(1):35-44.ZHOU Jiantao,LIAO Jianqiao. Effects of perceived organizational status on the relationship between power distance orientation and employee voice. Journal of Management Science,2012,25(1):35-44.(in Chinese)
[32]张燕红,廖建桥.团队真实型领导、新员工反馈寻求行为与社会化结果.管理科学,2015,28(2):126-136.ZHANG Yanhong,LIAO Jianqiao. Team authentic leadership,newcomer feedback-seeking behavior and socialization outcomes. Journal of Management Science,2015,28(2):126-136.(in Chinese)
[33]马粤娴,严鸣,黄国华.团队群体性组织偏差行为的产生机制.管理科学,2016,29(3):59-70.MA Yuexian,YAN Ming,HUANG Guohua. The formation of group collective organizational deviance. Journal of Management Science,2016,29(3):59-70.(in Chinese)
[34]郑晓明,刘鑫.互动公平对员工幸福感的影响:心理授权的中介作用与权力距离的调节作用.心理学报,2016,48(6):693-709.ZHENG Xiaoming,LIU Xin. The effect of interactional justice on employee well-being:the mediating role of psychological empowerment and the moderating role of power distance. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2016,48(6):693-709.(in Chinese)
[35]韦慧民,龙立荣.认知与情感信任、权力距离感和制度控制对领导授权行为的影响研究.管理工程学报,2011,25(1):10-17.WEI Huimin,LONG Lirong. The effect of cognition-and effect-based trust,power distance and system control on leader empowering behavior. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2011,25(1):10-17.(in Chinese)
[36]唐汉瑛,龙立荣,周如意.谦卑领导行为与下属工作投入:有中介的调节模型.管理科学,2015,28(3):77-89.TANG Hanying,LONG Lirong,ZHOU Ruyi. Humble leadership behavior and subordinates'work engagement:a mediated moderation model. Journal of Management Science,2015,28(3):77-89.(in Chinese)
[37] YOO B,DONTHU N,LENARTOWICZ T. Measuring Hofstede's five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level:development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing,2011,23(3/4):193-210.
[38] LIAN H W,FERRIS D L,BROWN D J. Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology,2012,97(1):107-123.
[39] BOTERO I C,DYNE L V. Employee voice behavior:interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly,2009,23(1):84-104.
[40] BLODGETT J,LU L C,ROSE G M,et al. Ethical sensitivity to stakeholder interests:a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2001,29(2):190-202.
[41] LIN W P,WANG L,CHEN S T. Abusive supervision and employee well-being:the moderating effect of power distance orientation. Applied Psychology,2013,62(2):308-329.
[42]WINTERICH K P,ZHANG Y L. Accepting inequality deters responsibility:how power distance decreases charitable behavior.Journal of Consumer Research,2014,41(2):274-293.
[43] HAN D,LALWANI A K,DUHACHEK A. Power distance belief,power,and charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research,2017,44(1):182-195.
[44] FEHR E,SCHMIDT K M. A theory of fairness,competition,and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1999,114(3):817-868.
[45] FERGUSON E. Mechanism of altruism approach to blood donor recruitment and retention:a review and future directions.Transfusion Medicine,2015,25(4):211-226.
[46] FRANCE C R,KOWALSKY J M,FRANCE J L,et al. The blood donor identity survey:a multidimensional measure of blood donor motivations. Transfusion,2014,54(8):2098-2105.
[47] BEDNALL T C,BOVE L L,CHEETHAM A,et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of antecedents of blood donation behavior and intentions. Social Science&Medicine,2013,96:86-94.
[48]WHITE K M,POULSEN B E,HYDE M K. Identity and personality influences on donating money,time,and blood. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,2016,46(2):372-394.
[49] MASSER B M,WHITE K M,HYDE M K,et al. Predicting blood donation intentions and behavior among Australian blood donors:testing an extended theory of planned behavior model. Transfusion,2009,49(2):320-329.
[50] LEE S,WINTERICH K P,ROSS W T. I'm moral,but I won't help you:the distinct roles of empathy and justice in donations. Journal of Consumer Research,2014,41(3):678-696.
[51] ERLANDSSON A,BJRKLUND F,BCKSTRM M. Emotional reactions,perceived impact and perceived responsibility mediate the identifiable victim effect,proportion dominance effect and in-group effect respectively. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2015,127:1-14.
[52] ERLANDSSON A,JUNGSTRAND A,VSTFJLL D. Anticipated guilt for not helping and anticipated warm glow for helping are differently impacted by personal responsibility to help. Frontiers in Psychology,2016,7:1-19.
[53] HEALY K. Embedded altruism:blood collection regimes and the European Union's donor population. American Journal of Sociology,2000,105(6):1633-1657.
[54] SHEHU E,BECKER J U,LANGMAACK A C,et al. The brand personality of nonprofit organizations and the influence of monetary incentives. Journal of Business Ethics,2016,138(3):589-600.
[55] VENABLE B T,ROSE G M,BUSH V D,et al. The role of brand personality in charitable giving:an assessment and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2005,33(3):295-312.
[56]侯俊东,杜兰英.影响个人捐赠决策的感知特性及其维度结构:基于中国的实证经验.公共管理学报,2011,8(2):109-118.HOU Jundong,DU Lanying. Perceptual characteristics and its dimension structure influencing individual donation decision:based on Chinese empirical evidence. Journal of Public Management,2011,8(2):109-118.(in Chinese)
[57]蒋晶.影响我国个人捐赠者捐赠决策过程的心理机制:基于情感适应理论的实证研究.中国软科学,2014(6):44-57.JIANG Jing. The mechanism affecting donation decision making process:an emotional adaptation perspective. China Soft Science,2014(6):44-57.(in Chinese)
[58]苏媛媛,石国亮.居民慈善捐赠影响因素分析:基于全国五大城市的调查分析.社会科学研究,2014(3):111-115.SU Yuanyuan,SHI Guoliang. Analysis on the influence factors of the residents'charitable donation:based on the survey study of the five big cities in China. Social Science Research,2014(3):111-115.(in Chinese)
[59]韦夏,涂荣庭,周志民.“准忠诚计划”失败对顾客满意的影响.管理科学,2017,30(3):110-121.WEI Xia,TU Rungting,ZHOU Zhimin. Effect of the failed“quasi-loyalty program”on customer satisfaction. Journal of Management Science,2017,30(3):110-121.(in Chinese)
[60]聂春艳,宋晓兵,孟佳佳.环境气味对消费者产品评价和购买意向的影响研究.管理科学,2016,29(5):93-105.NIE Chunyan,SONG Xiaobing,MENG Jiajia. The influence of ambient scent on consumers'product evaluation and purchase intention. Journal of Management Science,2016,29(5):93-105.(in Chinese)
[61] WANG J X,GUO N,GUO X M,et al. Who donates blood at five ethnically and geographically diverse blood centers in China in 2008. Transfusion,2010,50(12):2686-2694.
[62] LI C Q,XIAO X P,YIN H M,et al. Prevalence and prevalence trends of transfusion transmissible infections among blood donors at four Chinese regional blood centers between2000 and 2010. Journal of Translational Medicine,2012,10(1):176-186.
[63] LEMMENS K P H,ABRAHAM C,RUITER R A C,et al.Modelling antecedents of blood donation motivation among non-donors of varying age and education. British Journal of Psychology,2010,100(1):71-90.
[64]温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展.心理科学进展,2014,22(5):731-745.WEN Zhonglin,YE Baojuan. Analyses of mediating effects:the development of methods and models. Advances in Psychological Science,2014,22(5):731-745.(in Chinese)
[65] HAYES A F. Introduction to mediation,moderation,and conditional process analysis. New York,NY:The Guilford Press,2013:89-136.
[66] SPILLER S A,FITZSIMONS G J,LYNCH J G,et al. Spotlights,floodlights,and the magic number zero:simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research,2013,50(2):277-288.
[67]方杰,温忠麟,梁东梅,等.基于多元回归的调节效应分析.心理科学,2015,38(3):715-720.FANG Jie,WEN Zhonglin,LIANG Dongmei,et al. Moderation effect analyses based on multiple liner regression. Journal of Psychological Science,2015,38(3):715-720.(in Chinese)
[68]刘海建.制度环境、组织冗余与捐赠行为差异:在华中外资企业捐赠动机对比研究.管理评论,2013,25(8):77-91.LIU Haijian. Institutional environment,organizational slack and behaviors difference:an empirical study of comparison between local and foreign donor's motivation. Management Review,2013,25(8):77-91.(in Chinese)
[69]尹进,胡祥培,郑毅.基于主观逻辑方法的消费者多源信任融合模型.管理科学,2017,30(3):75-82.YIN Jin,HU Xiangpei,ZHENG Yi. Consumers'multi-source trust fusion model based on the subjective logic. Journal of Management Science,2017,30(3):75-82.(in Chinese)