基于信任关系和质量投入的玉米收储供应链治理机制研究
|
摘要
本研究针对高质量需求和供给双重不确定性引发的玉米供应链收储环节中断问题,研究了玉米收储供应链利润提升的供应链治理机理。本研究认为:玉米收储主体基于Stackelberg博弈方法无论采取分散决策还是集成决策,信任关系未形成时农场主质量投入利润回报不明显;信任关系专用性投资是提升供应链利润、激励农场主质量投入的有效策略;集成决策中收储主体采取信任关系专用性投资替代贷款投入策略是有条件的。据此,本文针对分散决策且无信任、有收储中断风险的供应链,构建了收储主体的治理路径。其中,信任关系协调机制的特点是信用抵押为主,利益共享机制以质量返利为主,该治理机制可用区块链技术支撑。在当今玉米收储制度改革的关键时期,本研究可以为政府相关收储政策出台提供理论基础。
To solve the interruption problem in corn storage stage among supply chain,which caused by theuncertainty of both high-quality demand and supply, this paper studies the mechanism of supply chain governance of corn storage stage to improve the profit. The results show that.,first,based on the results of Stackelberg game under both"centralized strategy"and"specific investment strategy"adopted by the market participants of corn storage,the profit return of the farmer's quality input is not significant when the trust relationship is not formed. Second,the trust specific investment is an effective strategy to improve the profit of the supply chain and stimulate the quality input from farmers. Third,under "centralized strategy",it is conditional for the entities of corn storage to adopt the specific investment of trust relationship instead of the loan investment strategy. Therefore,the governance path of the main participants of corn storage should be constructed for the supply chain with decentralized decision-making and no trust and risk of interruption of storage. Besides since the trust relationship coordination mechanism is characterized by credit mortgage,and the benefit sharing mechanism is mainly based on quality rebates,the governance mechanism can be supported by blockchain technology. In the critical period of corn storage system reform,our study provides a theoretical basis for the introduction of government policies.
To solve the interruption problem in corn storage stage among supply chain,which caused by theuncertainty of both high-quality demand and supply, this paper studies the mechanism of supply chain governance of corn storage stage to improve the profit. The results show that.,first,based on the results of Stackelberg game under both"centralized strategy"and"specific investment strategy"adopted by the market participants of corn storage,the profit return of the farmer's quality input is not significant when the trust relationship is not formed. Second,the trust specific investment is an effective strategy to improve the profit of the supply chain and stimulate the quality input from farmers. Third,under "centralized strategy",it is conditional for the entities of corn storage to adopt the specific investment of trust relationship instead of the loan investment strategy. Therefore,the governance path of the main participants of corn storage should be constructed for the supply chain with decentralized decision-making and no trust and risk of interruption of storage. Besides since the trust relationship coordination mechanism is characterized by credit mortgage,and the benefit sharing mechanism is mainly based on quality rebates,the governance mechanism can be supported by blockchain technology. In the critical period of corn storage system reform,our study provides a theoretical basis for the introduction of government policies.
引文
1.Madhusudan Ghosh.Agricultural policy reforms and spatial integration of food grain markets in india.Journal of Economic Development,2016,36(2):15~37
2.Tsanos Christos S.and Zografos Konstantinos G..The effects of behavioural supply chain relationship antecedents on integration and performance.Supply Chain Management,2016,21(6):673~693
3.Pezeshki Yahya,Baboli Armand,Cheikhrouhou Naoufel,Modarres Mohammad and Akbari Jokar Mohammad R.A rewarding-punishing coordination mechanism based on Trust in a divergent supply chain.European Journal of Operational Research,2013,230(3):527~538
4.罗必良,李尚蒲.论农业经营制度变革及拓展方向.农业技术经济,2018(1):4~16
5.李庆海,吕小锋,李成友,何婧.社会资本对农户信贷违约影响的机制分析.农业技术经济,2018(2):104~118
6.蔡海龙,关佳晨.不同经营规模农户借贷需求分析.农业技术经济,2018(4):90~97
7.张梓榆,温涛,王小华.“新常态”下中国农贷市场供求关系的重新解读---基于农户分化视角.农业技术经济,2018(4):54~64
8.许泉,黄惠春,祁艳.农地抵押风险与农户抵押贷款需求---以江苏试点为例.农业技术经济,2016(12):95~104
9.冷志杰,谢如鹤.基于玉米处理中心讨价还价博弈模型的原粮供应链治理模式.中国流通经济,2016(5):36~43
10.李维安,李勇建,石丹.供应链治理理论研究:概念、内涵与规范性分析框架.南开管理评论,2016,19(1):4~15,42
11.王影,张纯.供应链治理模式及其演化.中国流通经济,2017,31(2):64~72
12.董坤祥,侯文华,陈宗泽,丁慧平.信用期下时滞变质品供应链库存和定价的Stackelberg均衡策略.运筹与管理,2015,24(6):76~85
13.肖迪,潘可文.基于收益共享契约的供应链质量控制与协调机制.中国管理科学,2012,20(4):67~73
14.李建斌,余牛,刘志学.两种基于CVaR准则的供应链返利与惩罚契约研究.系统工程理论与实践,2015,35(7):1666~1677
15.陈正林.论供应链的治理机制及其完善对策.湖北社会科学,2014(11):85~88
16.覃汉松,欧阳梓祥.供应链中信任关系的建立和发展.经济管理,2002(16):58~61
17.胡建理,吴泉源,周斌.P2P环境下基于信任的信任模型研究.计算机科学,2009,36(9):1~6,16
18.田立法.高承诺工作系统驱动知识共享:信任关系的中介作用及性别的调节作用.管理评论,2015,27(6):148~159
19.周小梅,范鸿飞.区域声誉可激励农产品质量安全水平提升吗?---基于浙江省丽水区域品牌案例的研究.农业经济问题,2017,38(4):85~92,112
20.赵学军.农村信用担保制度变迁.中国金融,2016(5):98~99
21.黄子健,王龑.大数据、互联网金融与信用资本:破解小微企业融资悖论.金融经济学研究,2015,30(1):55~67
22.李青,张鑫.区块链:以技术推动教育的开放和公信.远程教育杂志,2017,35(1):36~44
23.魏旭光,康凯,张志颖,张敬.生产型企业间信任对合作满意度的影响研究---关系专用性投资的中介作用.预测,2013,32(2):42~48
24.刘蕾,鄢章华.区块链体系下的产业集群融资信任机制.中国流通经济,2017,31(12):73~79
25.赵晓丽,乞建勋.供应链不同合作模式下合作利益分配机制研究---以煤电企业供应链为例.中国管理科学,2007(4):70~76
26.尹进,胡祥培,郑毅.基于主观逻辑方法的消费者多源信任融合模型.管理科学,2017,30(3):75~82
27.肖迪,郝云宏.基于关系契约的供应链企业社会责任协调及成本分担策略.中国流通经济,2017,31(6):53~60
2.Tsanos Christos S.and Zografos Konstantinos G..The effects of behavioural supply chain relationship antecedents on integration and performance.Supply Chain Management,2016,21(6):673~693
3.Pezeshki Yahya,Baboli Armand,Cheikhrouhou Naoufel,Modarres Mohammad and Akbari Jokar Mohammad R.A rewarding-punishing coordination mechanism based on Trust in a divergent supply chain.European Journal of Operational Research,2013,230(3):527~538
4.罗必良,李尚蒲.论农业经营制度变革及拓展方向.农业技术经济,2018(1):4~16
5.李庆海,吕小锋,李成友,何婧.社会资本对农户信贷违约影响的机制分析.农业技术经济,2018(2):104~118
6.蔡海龙,关佳晨.不同经营规模农户借贷需求分析.农业技术经济,2018(4):90~97
7.张梓榆,温涛,王小华.“新常态”下中国农贷市场供求关系的重新解读---基于农户分化视角.农业技术经济,2018(4):54~64
8.许泉,黄惠春,祁艳.农地抵押风险与农户抵押贷款需求---以江苏试点为例.农业技术经济,2016(12):95~104
9.冷志杰,谢如鹤.基于玉米处理中心讨价还价博弈模型的原粮供应链治理模式.中国流通经济,2016(5):36~43
10.李维安,李勇建,石丹.供应链治理理论研究:概念、内涵与规范性分析框架.南开管理评论,2016,19(1):4~15,42
11.王影,张纯.供应链治理模式及其演化.中国流通经济,2017,31(2):64~72
12.董坤祥,侯文华,陈宗泽,丁慧平.信用期下时滞变质品供应链库存和定价的Stackelberg均衡策略.运筹与管理,2015,24(6):76~85
13.肖迪,潘可文.基于收益共享契约的供应链质量控制与协调机制.中国管理科学,2012,20(4):67~73
14.李建斌,余牛,刘志学.两种基于CVaR准则的供应链返利与惩罚契约研究.系统工程理论与实践,2015,35(7):1666~1677
15.陈正林.论供应链的治理机制及其完善对策.湖北社会科学,2014(11):85~88
16.覃汉松,欧阳梓祥.供应链中信任关系的建立和发展.经济管理,2002(16):58~61
17.胡建理,吴泉源,周斌.P2P环境下基于信任的信任模型研究.计算机科学,2009,36(9):1~6,16
18.田立法.高承诺工作系统驱动知识共享:信任关系的中介作用及性别的调节作用.管理评论,2015,27(6):148~159
19.周小梅,范鸿飞.区域声誉可激励农产品质量安全水平提升吗?---基于浙江省丽水区域品牌案例的研究.农业经济问题,2017,38(4):85~92,112
20.赵学军.农村信用担保制度变迁.中国金融,2016(5):98~99
21.黄子健,王龑.大数据、互联网金融与信用资本:破解小微企业融资悖论.金融经济学研究,2015,30(1):55~67
22.李青,张鑫.区块链:以技术推动教育的开放和公信.远程教育杂志,2017,35(1):36~44
23.魏旭光,康凯,张志颖,张敬.生产型企业间信任对合作满意度的影响研究---关系专用性投资的中介作用.预测,2013,32(2):42~48
24.刘蕾,鄢章华.区块链体系下的产业集群融资信任机制.中国流通经济,2017,31(12):73~79
25.赵晓丽,乞建勋.供应链不同合作模式下合作利益分配机制研究---以煤电企业供应链为例.中国管理科学,2007(4):70~76
26.尹进,胡祥培,郑毅.基于主观逻辑方法的消费者多源信任融合模型.管理科学,2017,30(3):75~82
27.肖迪,郝云宏.基于关系契约的供应链企业社会责任协调及成本分担策略.中国流通经济,2017,31(6):53~60