论调查令制度在化解“举证难”中的作用及其完善路径
|
摘要
证据是人民法院审理案件和作出裁决的关键所在。然而,在司法实践中,由于举证能力有限,当事人举证往往发生诸多困难。律师调查令制度具有保障当事人举证权作用,在一定程度上能够化解"举证难"的问题。但是,律师调查令在适用上也存在着诸如不具备强制力障碍,以至于不能完全发挥调查令制度的作用。因此,分析当事人"举证难"的原因、调查令制度的作用以及完善调查令制度的路径具有现实意义,同时也是我国司法改革的趋势所在。
Evidence is the key for the People's Courts to hear cases and make decisions. However, in the judicial practice, because of the limited ability of proof, the parties often have many difficulties in making evidence. The attorney's investigation writ system has the function of guaranteeing the party's right to evidence, and to a certain extent, it can solve the difficulties in obtaining evidence. However, there are also obstacles such as the lack of coercive power in the application of a attorney's investigation order, which cannot fully function as an investigation order system. Therefore,, it has reality to analyze the reasons of difficulties in obtaining evidence, the function of investigation writ system and perfect the way of it. Meanwhile, it is also the tendency of judicial reform.
Evidence is the key for the People's Courts to hear cases and make decisions. However, in the judicial practice, because of the limited ability of proof, the parties often have many difficulties in making evidence. The attorney's investigation writ system has the function of guaranteeing the party's right to evidence, and to a certain extent, it can solve the difficulties in obtaining evidence. However, there are also obstacles such as the lack of coercive power in the application of a attorney's investigation order, which cannot fully function as an investigation order system. Therefore,, it has reality to analyze the reasons of difficulties in obtaining evidence, the function of investigation writ system and perfect the way of it. Meanwhile, it is also the tendency of judicial reform.
引文
[1]廖中洪.论中国民事证据发现制度的构建——一个比较法视角的思考[J].金陵法律评论,2004(2):137-148.
[2]尚伟,楚仑.律师调查令亟需提高成功率[EB/OL].(2017-08-25)[2018-05-11].http://cqfy.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2017/08/id/2973614.shtml.
[3]余建华.四千份调查令发出之后[N].人民法院报.2007-08-14(08).
[4]王杏飞,刘洋.论我国民事诉讼中的律师调查令[J].法治研究,2017(3):118-130.
[5]美国联邦民事诉讼规则证据规则[M].白绿铉,卞建林,译.北京:中国法制出社,2000:48.
[6]杨静.江西全面推行律师调查令制度[N].江西日报.2017-09-14(02).
[7]吴荣鹏.对律师调查令制度的几点思考[N].人民法院报,2016-10-26(07).
[8]杨傲多.半数律师调查令取证成功[N].法制日报,2017-04-17(03).
[9]汤维建.诉讼证明的构成环节及运行法则[J].郑州轻工业学院学报(社会科学版),2006(4):3-6.
[10]汤维建.民事证据法典化的价值确证与难题解析[J].证据科学,2009(2):153-161.
(1)参见《民事诉讼法》第64条。
(2)参见《民事诉讼法》第64条、《律师法》第35条。
(3)参见《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国民事诉讼法>的解释》第90条。
(4)参见《刑事诉讼法》第49条、第50条、第51条、第64条。
(5)参见《天津市高级人民法院关于在民事诉讼中实行律师调查令的若干规定(试行)》第1条。
(6)参见《最高人民法院关于认真贯彻律师法依法保障律师在诉讼中执业权利的通知》第3条第7款。
[2]尚伟,楚仑.律师调查令亟需提高成功率[EB/OL].(2017-08-25)[2018-05-11].http://cqfy.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2017/08/id/2973614.shtml.
[3]余建华.四千份调查令发出之后[N].人民法院报.2007-08-14(08).
[4]王杏飞,刘洋.论我国民事诉讼中的律师调查令[J].法治研究,2017(3):118-130.
[5]美国联邦民事诉讼规则证据规则[M].白绿铉,卞建林,译.北京:中国法制出社,2000:48.
[6]杨静.江西全面推行律师调查令制度[N].江西日报.2017-09-14(02).
[7]吴荣鹏.对律师调查令制度的几点思考[N].人民法院报,2016-10-26(07).
[8]杨傲多.半数律师调查令取证成功[N].法制日报,2017-04-17(03).
[9]汤维建.诉讼证明的构成环节及运行法则[J].郑州轻工业学院学报(社会科学版),2006(4):3-6.
[10]汤维建.民事证据法典化的价值确证与难题解析[J].证据科学,2009(2):153-161.
(1)参见《民事诉讼法》第64条。
(2)参见《民事诉讼法》第64条、《律师法》第35条。
(3)参见《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国民事诉讼法>的解释》第90条。
(4)参见《刑事诉讼法》第49条、第50条、第51条、第64条。
(5)参见《天津市高级人民法院关于在民事诉讼中实行律师调查令的若干规定(试行)》第1条。
(6)参见《最高人民法院关于认真贯彻律师法依法保障律师在诉讼中执业权利的通知》第3条第7款。