近代社团春禅词社考论
|
摘要
春禅词社是以赵熙为核心的由民国四川词人所形成的文学社团,亦名锦城词社、成都词社、锦江词社、丁巳词社、花行词社等。词社的唱和方式主要有书信和雅集两种。社作既以"绮语"达禅心,又表现了对战乱的厌恶及对太平的渴望,还描写了宴饮雅集的闲适生活及自然景物、四川风物。春禅词社的唱和类型多样,艺术风格亦喜亦悲,语言婉约中有刚劲。对春禅词社的考察,既有助于词作辑佚和编年,又有助于深化对民国四川词人活动的研究,还有利于对民初四川词坛的研究及民初四川词学研究的深化。
The Chunchan poetry community was a literary community formed by Sichuan ci poets in the Republic of China with ZHAO Xi as the core. It was also known as Jincheng,Chengdu,Jinjiang,Dingsi,Huaxing poetry community. There were two main ways of poetic antiphony in the community,letter and collection. The works not only reached zen heart with the "Yee language",but also expressed the aversion to war and the desire for peace,and described the leisure life,natural scenery and Sichuan style of entertainment as well. There were various types of antiphonic composition of poems in the community,and the artistic style was both happy and sad,with toughness in the graceful language. The investigation into the Chunchan poetry community is not only helpful to the compilation and chronology of ci poems,but also to the in-depth study on both the activities of ci poets and the ci circles in Sichuan in the early Republic of China as well as the deepening of the study on ci poetry in Sichuan.
The Chunchan poetry community was a literary community formed by Sichuan ci poets in the Republic of China with ZHAO Xi as the core. It was also known as Jincheng,Chengdu,Jinjiang,Dingsi,Huaxing poetry community. There were two main ways of poetic antiphony in the community,letter and collection. The works not only reached zen heart with the "Yee language",but also expressed the aversion to war and the desire for peace,and described the leisure life,natural scenery and Sichuan style of entertainment as well. There were various types of antiphonic composition of poems in the community,and the artistic style was both happy and sad,with toughness in the graceful language. The investigation into the Chunchan poetry community is not only helpful to the compilation and chronology of ci poems,but also to the in-depth study on both the activities of ci poets and the ci circles in Sichuan in the early Republic of China as well as the deepening of the study on ci poetry in Sichuan.
引文
[1]曹辛华.民国词史考论[M].北京:人民出版社,2017.
[2]李树民.赵熙文学论稿[M].成都:西南交通大学出版社,2012.
[3]曹辛华.晩清民国旧体诗词结社文献考述[J].国学,2016(1):439-470.
[4]毛欣然.成都词社考———兼谈赵熙在成都词社中的地位与影响[J].蜀学,2018(2):178-189.
[5]赵熙等.春禅词社词[M].民国六年(1917)铅印本.
[6]赵熙,著.王仲镛,主编.赵熙集[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2014.
[7]林思进.清寂词录[M].民国三十二年(1944)刻本.
[8]赵熙等.花行小集[M].民国刻本.
[9]韩祥生.玉雪双清[M].重庆:重庆出版社,2011.
[10]邓潜.牟珠词[M].民国十一年(1922)刻本.
[11]林思进.清寂堂集[M].成都:巴蜀书社,1989.
[12]邓鸿荃.秋雁词[M].民国七年(1918)刻本.
[13]张慎仪.今悔庵词[M].民国八年(1919)刻本.
[14]陈廷湘,李德琬.李思纯文集·诗词卷[M].成都:巴蜀书社,2009.
[15]江子愚.听秋词[M].民国排印本.
[16]赵念君.香宋先生年谱(续)[J].成都大学学报:社科版,1997(1):47-57.
[17]曹辛华.晚清民国旧体诗词结社文献的类型、特点及价值[J].复旦学报:社会科学版,2015(1):80-88.
[18]孙旭军,蒋松,陈卫东.四川民俗大观[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1989.
[19]王翼奇,等著.刘梦芙,编校.当代诗词丛话[M].合肥:黄山书社,2009.
[20]孙克强,杨传庆,裴喆.清人词话[M].天津:南开大学出版社,2012.
(1)林思进.雪苑词[M].成都新新新闻报馆印行,癸未(1943)正月铅印本.笔者按:赵熙丁巳(1917)、戊午(1918)年间并未到成都。林氏所云“宋问琴、胡玉津、邓休庵约结词社,所谓白秋海棠、黛黛花皆予主社时题”之事,应在丙辰年(1916)。另,因赵熙曾于丁巳(1917)三月作《甘州》“十二忆”组词并寄锦城词社(成都),故林氏所言“丁巳词社”却是实有。
[2]李树民.赵熙文学论稿[M].成都:西南交通大学出版社,2012.
[3]曹辛华.晩清民国旧体诗词结社文献考述[J].国学,2016(1):439-470.
[4]毛欣然.成都词社考———兼谈赵熙在成都词社中的地位与影响[J].蜀学,2018(2):178-189.
[5]赵熙等.春禅词社词[M].民国六年(1917)铅印本.
[6]赵熙,著.王仲镛,主编.赵熙集[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2014.
[7]林思进.清寂词录[M].民国三十二年(1944)刻本.
[8]赵熙等.花行小集[M].民国刻本.
[9]韩祥生.玉雪双清[M].重庆:重庆出版社,2011.
[10]邓潜.牟珠词[M].民国十一年(1922)刻本.
[11]林思进.清寂堂集[M].成都:巴蜀书社,1989.
[12]邓鸿荃.秋雁词[M].民国七年(1918)刻本.
[13]张慎仪.今悔庵词[M].民国八年(1919)刻本.
[14]陈廷湘,李德琬.李思纯文集·诗词卷[M].成都:巴蜀书社,2009.
[15]江子愚.听秋词[M].民国排印本.
[16]赵念君.香宋先生年谱(续)[J].成都大学学报:社科版,1997(1):47-57.
[17]曹辛华.晚清民国旧体诗词结社文献的类型、特点及价值[J].复旦学报:社会科学版,2015(1):80-88.
[18]孙旭军,蒋松,陈卫东.四川民俗大观[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1989.
[19]王翼奇,等著.刘梦芙,编校.当代诗词丛话[M].合肥:黄山书社,2009.
[20]孙克强,杨传庆,裴喆.清人词话[M].天津:南开大学出版社,2012.
(1)林思进.雪苑词[M].成都新新新闻报馆印行,癸未(1943)正月铅印本.笔者按:赵熙丁巳(1917)、戊午(1918)年间并未到成都。林氏所云“宋问琴、胡玉津、邓休庵约结词社,所谓白秋海棠、黛黛花皆予主社时题”之事,应在丙辰年(1916)。另,因赵熙曾于丁巳(1917)三月作《甘州》“十二忆”组词并寄锦城词社(成都),故林氏所言“丁巳词社”却是实有。