医学期刊编辑初审过程中对“枪手”论文的识别
|
摘要
医学论文代写代发现象严重,医学期刊编辑应当在初审环节注意对"枪手"论文的识别,以避免低质、伪造论文传播造成的不良后果。目前单单使用学术不端文献检测系统(AMLC)来检测,已经不能很好地识别"枪手"论文。《大连医科大学学报》编辑总结了一些识别"枪手"论文的经验:关注注册账户用户名及密码的规律性,作者手机号码及登录系统所用IP地址的归属地,作者学历、职称以及论文本身质量等相关信息,可以很好地识别"枪手"论文。认为编辑有义务遏制学术不端,净化学术环境。
The medical journal editors should identify the ghost papers in initial evaluation in order to avoid the bad results caused by the transmission of the low-quality papers. Traditional methods such as the detection system of academic misconduct(AMLC),and the vigilance of large-scale mass submissions have not been able to identify ghost papers. The editors of the Journal of Dalian Medical University summed up some experiences of identifying ghost papers. They found that paying attention to the regularity of registration account mailboxes, account passwords, regions of authors' mobile phone number and IP address, the authors 'academic qualifications and titles,as well as the quality of the papers themselves can be a good way of identification of ghost papers. Editors have the obligation to curb academic misconduct and improve the quality of periodicals to purify the academic environment.
The medical journal editors should identify the ghost papers in initial evaluation in order to avoid the bad results caused by the transmission of the low-quality papers. Traditional methods such as the detection system of academic misconduct(AMLC),and the vigilance of large-scale mass submissions have not been able to identify ghost papers. The editors of the Journal of Dalian Medical University summed up some experiences of identifying ghost papers. They found that paying attention to the regularity of registration account mailboxes, account passwords, regions of authors' mobile phone number and IP address, the authors 'academic qualifications and titles,as well as the quality of the papers themselves can be a good way of identification of ghost papers. Editors have the obligation to curb academic misconduct and improve the quality of periodicals to purify the academic environment.
引文
[1]彭妍捷,严金海.我国医学论文撤稿现象反思[J].医学与哲学(A),2016(7):25
[2]苑苏文,王明婷.107篇中国论文撤稿始末[J].财新周刊,2017(17):74
[3]廖杉,龙云飞,秦曰龙.学术期刊论文代发产业链的调查分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2012,23(4):606
[4]胡泽文,武夷山.论文代写代发现象之研究[J].中国软科学,2012(7):78
[5]王萍,杨淑珍,于智龙,等.科技期刊编辑初审对论文质量的影响[J].编辑学报,2011,23(5):414
[6]张海燕,张和,鲁翠涛.作者基本信息在稿件真实性审查中的应用[J].编辑学报,2017,29(2):168
[7]刘清海.从来稿基本信息着手发现学术不端的线索[J].编辑学报,2014,26(5):449
[8]唐虹.编辑对学术不端检测结果的判断[J].中国报业,2013(9x):16
[9]王文福.期刊防范学术不端的深度反思:兼谈对AMLC系统的理性认知[J].编辑之友,2017(3):32
[10]石芸,周晓凤.综合性医学期刊初审编辑工作规范的探讨[J].重庆医学,2014(21):2821
[11]吴艳妮,周春兰.科技期刊编辑对学术不端论文的识别:以《护理学报》为例[J].编辑学报,2015,27(4):361
[12]陈锐锋.加强作者相关信息审查预防学术造假发生:1起来稿涉嫌学术造假给我们的启示[J].编辑学报,2016,28(2):144
[13]陶范.析编辑的偏见[J].出版发行研究,2005(12):32
[2]苑苏文,王明婷.107篇中国论文撤稿始末[J].财新周刊,2017(17):74
[3]廖杉,龙云飞,秦曰龙.学术期刊论文代发产业链的调查分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2012,23(4):606
[4]胡泽文,武夷山.论文代写代发现象之研究[J].中国软科学,2012(7):78
[5]王萍,杨淑珍,于智龙,等.科技期刊编辑初审对论文质量的影响[J].编辑学报,2011,23(5):414
[6]张海燕,张和,鲁翠涛.作者基本信息在稿件真实性审查中的应用[J].编辑学报,2017,29(2):168
[7]刘清海.从来稿基本信息着手发现学术不端的线索[J].编辑学报,2014,26(5):449
[8]唐虹.编辑对学术不端检测结果的判断[J].中国报业,2013(9x):16
[9]王文福.期刊防范学术不端的深度反思:兼谈对AMLC系统的理性认知[J].编辑之友,2017(3):32
[10]石芸,周晓凤.综合性医学期刊初审编辑工作规范的探讨[J].重庆医学,2014(21):2821
[11]吴艳妮,周春兰.科技期刊编辑对学术不端论文的识别:以《护理学报》为例[J].编辑学报,2015,27(4):361
[12]陈锐锋.加强作者相关信息审查预防学术造假发生:1起来稿涉嫌学术造假给我们的启示[J].编辑学报,2016,28(2):144
[13]陶范.析编辑的偏见[J].出版发行研究,2005(12):32