经济技术开发区建设对中国经济格局的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The Impact of Economic and Technological Development Zone on China's Economic Pattern
  • 作者:郑智 ; 叶尔肯·吾扎提 ; 梁宜 ; 张若琰 ; 刘卫东
  • 英文作者:ZHENG Zhi;YEERKEN Wuzhati;LIANG Yi;ZHANG Ruoyan;LIU Weidong;Institute of Geography Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS;Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling,CAS;College of Resources and Environment,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;
  • 关键词:经济技术开发区 ; 经济格局演变 ; 区域差异 ; 增速效应 ; 溢出效应 ; 转型升级 ; 增长极
  • 英文关键词:economic and technological development zone;;evolution of economic pattern;;regional difference;;growth rate effect;;spillover effect;;transformation and upgrading;;growth pole
  • 中文刊名:JJDL
  • 英文刊名:Economic Geography
  • 机构:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所;中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室;中国科学院大学资源与环境学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-12 10:58
  • 出版单位:经济地理
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39;No.256
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金重点项目(41530751)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JJDL201906004
  • 页数:10
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:43-1126/K
  • 分类号:28-37
摘要
改革开放以来,经济技术开发区作为中国经济发展的试验田和先导力量,引领着地方经济的转型和增长。经济技术开发区的建设对中国经济格局是否存在显著影响,这种影响又如何表现是一个非常有意义的研究议题。文章将经济技术开发区对当地经济作用关系归纳为增速效应与溢出效应两种形式,并通过地理加权回归等空间计量方法对其进行定量刻画,研究发现:①经济技术开发区数量以及增加值分布呈现出东、中、西部依次递减的格局,并主要集中在由长江经济带,以及长三角以北的沿海经济带组成的反"L"形区域。②高增速效应区域由西北转向东部沿海,最后集中于长江经济带,而高溢出效应区域则由西部转向东南,最终集中于中部地区。③根据增速效应和溢出效应的数值关系,可将经济技术开发区对城市的作用类型分为高增速高溢出、低增速高溢出、高增速低溢出以及低增速低溢出效应四种类型。其中高—高型主要分布在长江经济带中游,高—低型分布在西北以及东部沿海,低—高型分布在中部以及东北地区,而低—低型则主要分布于环渤海和江苏以及内蒙古、甘肃和陕西一带。④经济技术开发区的建设更进一步地加强东部地区经济优势。文章提出:经济技术开发区建设和转型过程中,应注重增速效应和溢出效应的均衡发展,提升自身增速的同时,积极融入到区域经济以及社会网络中去,更好地服务于当地经济发展。
        Since the reform and opening, the economic and technological development zone, as a test field and leading force for China's economic development, has always been leading the transformation and growth of the local economy.Whether the construction of them have conducted a significant impact on China's economic structure and how this effect is manifested are very significant research topics. In this paper, the contribution forms the economic and technological development zone on the local economy is summarized as growth effect and spillover effect, and it is quantitatively characterized by geographically weighted regression and other spatial analysis methods. Major conclusions are drawn as follows: 1)The number and added value pattern of the economic and technological development zone shows a decreasing trend from the east to the west mainly gathers in the inverted "L-shaped" region consisting of the Yangtze River Economic Belt and the coastal economic belt. 2) The areas with high growth effect turn from the northwest to the eastern coast and finally concentrate on the Yangtze River Economic Belt, while the areas with high spillover effect turn from the west to the southeast and finally concentrate in the middle region. 3) According to the numerical relationship between the growth effect and the spillover effect, this paper classifies the effect of the economic and technological development zone on the city as four types which are high-growth and high-spillover(H-H), low-growth and high-spillover(L-H), highgrowth and low-spillover(H-L), low-growth and low-spillover(L-L). The H-H type mainly distributes in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. The H-L type distributes in the northwest and the east coast, the L-H type distributes in the central and northeast areas, and the L-L type mainly distributes in the Bohai Rim, Jiangsu and Inner Mongolia, Gansu and Shaanxi. 4) The construction of the economic and technological development zone has further strengthened the economic advantages of the eastern region. The paper puts forward that in the process of construction and transformation of the economic and technological development zone, more attention should be payed to balance the development of growth effect and spillover effect. While improving its growth rate, actively integrating it into the regional economy and social network is conducive to better serve the local economic development.
引文
[1]张晓平.我国经济技术开发区的发展特征及动力机制[J].地理研究,2002(5):656-666.
    [2]张晓平,刘卫东.开发区与我国城市空间结构演进及其动力机制[J].地理科学,2003(2):142-149.
    [3]郭小碚,张伯旭.对开发区管理体制的思考和建议——国家级经济技术开发区调研报告[J].宏观经济研究,2007(10):9-14.
    [4]邓春玉.我国开发区管理体制创新趋势分析——兼论广东湛江国家级经济技术开发区东海岛新区管理体制[J].城市发展研究,2007(1):111-118,126.
    [5]丛林.国家级经济技术开发区发展战略研究[J].开发研究,2005(2):27-28.
    [6]赵晓冬,王伟伟,吕爱国.国家级经济技术开发区管理体制类型研究[J].中国行政管理,2013(12):56-59.
    [7]龙花楼,蔡运龙,万军.开发区土地利用的可持续性评价——以江苏昆山经济技术开发区为例[J].地理学报,2000(6):719-728.
    [8]冯薇.产业集聚与生态工业园的建设[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2006(3):51-55.
    [9]李同昇,韦亚权,周华.生态工业园及其规划设计探讨[J].经济地理,2005,25(5):647-650.
    [10]王文滋.再论我国经济技术开发区城市化功能开发[J].城市开发,1999(1):33-35.
    [11]陈昭锋.论我国经济技术开发区城市化功能开发[J].城市开发,1998(4):19-21.
    [12]高超,金凤君.沿海地区经济技术开发区空间格局演化及产业特征[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):202-213.
    [13]黄小斌.试论我国高技术开发区布局[J].经济地理,2000(6):34-38.
    [14]陈汉欣.中国高技术开发区的类型与建设布局研究[J].经济地理,1999,19(1):7-11.
    [15]江立武,赵小敏.基于GIS空间模型的开发区土地集约利用评价研究[J].开发研究,2010(2):10-12,40.
    [16]黄凌翔,赵娣,金丽国.开发区土地集约利用潜力实现研究——基于天津经济技术开发区673个地块的调研[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(10):33-39.
    [17]胡新智.中国国家级经济技术开发区产业集群效果分析[J].管理评论,2005(7):20-26,63.
    [18]Keeble D,Lawson C,Moore B,et al.Collective learning processes,networking and institutional thickness in the Cambridge region[J].Regional Studies,1999,33(4):319-332.
    [19]Lawson C.Towards a competence theory of the region[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics,1999,23:151-169.
    [20]Bwalya,Samuel Mulenga,foreign direct invesstment and technology spillovers:evidence from panel data analysis of manufacturing firms in Zambia[J].Journal of Development Economics,2006,81:514-526.
    [21]Wei Yehua Dennis,Leung Chi Kin.Development zones foreign investment,and global city formation in shanghai[J].Growth and Change,2005,36(1):16-40.
    [22]余军华.高新技术开发区与湖北区域经济发展战略的一个可能性框架[J].科技进步与对策,2008(8):112-115.
    [23]何丹,蔡建明,周璟.天津开发区与城市空间结构演进分析[J].地理科学进展,2008(6):97-103.
    [24]王缉慈.高新技术产业开发区对区域发展影响的分析构架[J].中国工业经济,1998(3):54-57.
    [25]王慧.开发区与城市相互关系的内在肌理及空间效应[J].城市规划,2003(3):20-25.
    [26]Perroux F.Economic Space:Theory and Applications[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1950,64(1):89-104.
    [27]Grubel H G.Towards a theory of free economic zones[J].Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,1982,118(1):39-61.
    [28]Shearmur R,Doloreux D.Science parks:actors or reactors?Canadian science parks in ther urban context[J].Environment&Planning A,2000,32(6):1 065-1 082.
    [29]王少剑,王洋,赵亚博.1990年来广东区域发展的空间溢出效应及驱动因素[J].地理学报,2015,70(6):965-979.
    [30]熊义杰.技术溢出效应与区域经济发展[M].北京:科学出版社,2016.
    [31]覃文忠.地理加权回归基本理论与应用研究[D].上海:同济大学,2007.
    [32]林锦耀,黎夏.基于空间自相关的东莞市主体功能区划分[J].地理研究,2014,33(2):349-357.
    [33]孙倩,汤放华.基于空间扩展模型和地理加权回归模型的城市住房价格空间分异比较[J].地理研究,2015,34(7):1 343-1 351.
    [34]姚丽,谷国锋.基于GWR的河南省县域经济差异及其驱动因子的时空演变研究[J].河南科学,2014,32(9):1 853-1 859.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700