区位选择、双边匹配与化解产能过剩的机制设计
|
摘要
通过对企业区位选择与开发区招商引资进行双边匹配的机制设计,可将厂商选址的单边搜寻行为变为市场与政府的双边匹配过程,将各地分散市场变为全国集合交易,重构地方政府招商引资模式,激发市场微观主体活力。通过地方政府对自身比较优势的自我挖掘,进一步优化资源配置,加速市场出清,形成市场作用和政府职能有机统一的格局,助力产业有序转移,为从根本上化解我国产能过剩以及重复建设等经济顽疾提供有效路径。
This paper can change unilateral action which make enterprise choose location into bilateral matching process which match between market and government, transform the scattered market into central cleaning house,reconstruct the pattern of attraction investment of local government and evoke vitality of market by mechanism design of two-sided matching which match between location choice of enterprise and attraction investment of local government. This paper can optimize the allocation of resources, accelerate clear of market, integrate the government with the market, promote industries to transfer orderly, and provide a valid way that can dissolve overcapacity and repeated construction in China by exploration of their own comparable advantages in local government.
This paper can change unilateral action which make enterprise choose location into bilateral matching process which match between market and government, transform the scattered market into central cleaning house,reconstruct the pattern of attraction investment of local government and evoke vitality of market by mechanism design of two-sided matching which match between location choice of enterprise and attraction investment of local government. This paper can optimize the allocation of resources, accelerate clear of market, integrate the government with the market, promote industries to transfer orderly, and provide a valid way that can dissolve overcapacity and repeated construction in China by exploration of their own comparable advantages in local government.
引文
[1]Beckmann,M.J..A Neoclassical Land Use Model.Swedish Journal of Economics,1971,(1):pp.1~7.
[2]康德拉·斯塔尔:《城市企业区位》,载《区域和城市经济学手册(第二卷)》,经济科学出版社,2003年
[3]刘钜强赵永亮:《交通基础设施、市场获得与制造业区位——来自中国的经验数据》,《南开经济研究》2010年第4期,第123~138页
[4]郝寿义等:《企业区位选择与空间集聚的博弈分析》,《南开经济研究》2011年第3期,第69~78页
[5]叶素云叶振宇:《中国工业企业的区位选择:市场潜力、资源禀赋与税负水平》,《南开经济研究》2012年第5期,第94~109页
[6]雷欣陈继勇:《技术进步、研发投入与外商直接投资的区位选择》,《世界经济研究》2011年第8期,第62~75页
[7]Krugman,P..Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.Journal of Political Economy,1991,(3):pp.483~499.
[8]Ghosh,D.K.,Ghosh,S..Optimum Choice of an MNC:Location and Investment.The American Economist,1997,(2):pp.41~46.
[9]Pfann,G.,Kranenburg,H.V..Tax Policy,Location Choices,and Market Structure.Journal of Law and Economics,2003,46(1):pp.61~84.
[10]Bobonis,G.J.,Shatz,H.J..Agglomeration,Adjustment,and State Policies in the Location of Foreign Direct Investmentin the United States.The Review of Economics and Statistics,2007,(1):pp.30~43.
[11]Baldwin,R.,Okubo,T..Tax Reform,Delocation,and Heterogeneous Firms.The Scandinavian Journal of Economics,2009,(4):pp.741~764.
[12]Jordan,J.A..Agglomerationandthe Location Choiceof Foreign Direct Investmen:New evidence From Manufactoring FDI in Mexico.Estudios Economics,2012,(1):pp.61-97.
[13]罗云辉:《地区间招商引资优惠政策竞争与先发优势》,《经济科学》2009年第5期,第96~106页
[14]杨晓丽许垒:《中国式分权下地方政府FDI税收竞争的策略性及其经济增长效应》,《经济评论》2011年第3期,第59~68页
[15]Gale,D.,Shapley,L.S..College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage.American Mathematical Monthly,1962,(1):pp.9~15.
[16]Abdulkadiroglu,A.,Sonmez,T..School Choice:A Mechanism Design Approach.American Economic Review,2002,(3):pp.729~747.
[17]Abdulkadiroglu,A.,Pathak,P.A.,Roth,A.E.,Sonmez,T..The Boston Public School Match.American Economic Review,2005,(2):pp.368~371.
[18]Abdulkadiroglu,A.,Pathak,P.A.,Roth,A.E..The New York City High School Match.American Economic Review,2005,(2):pp.364~367.
[19]张米尔王德鲁:《产业转型中项目机会研究的匹配矩阵方法》,《数量经济技术经济研究》2003年第9期,第138~142页
[20]曹国华胡义:《风险投资家和创业者的双边匹配模型研究》,《科技进步与对策》2009年第6期,第28~30页
[21]陈希等:《考虑关联性指标的双边匹配决策方法》,《运筹与管理》2012年第6期,第94~99页
[22]Roth,A.E..The Economics of Matching:Stability and Incentives.Mathematics of Operations Research,1982,(4):pp.617~628.
1数据来源于《中国区域经济统计年鉴·2013》。
1数据来源:《中国开发区年鉴·2013》。
2 SAR和SEM模型使用最大似然估计方法。
3 用于检验残差项空间自相关的统计量Moran’s I=n∑n i=1∑n j=1wij(εi-ε)(εj-ε)/∑n i=1∑n j=1wij∑n i=1(εi-ε)2 ,ε为残差。
[2]康德拉·斯塔尔:《城市企业区位》,载《区域和城市经济学手册(第二卷)》,经济科学出版社,2003年
[3]刘钜强赵永亮:《交通基础设施、市场获得与制造业区位——来自中国的经验数据》,《南开经济研究》2010年第4期,第123~138页
[4]郝寿义等:《企业区位选择与空间集聚的博弈分析》,《南开经济研究》2011年第3期,第69~78页
[5]叶素云叶振宇:《中国工业企业的区位选择:市场潜力、资源禀赋与税负水平》,《南开经济研究》2012年第5期,第94~109页
[6]雷欣陈继勇:《技术进步、研发投入与外商直接投资的区位选择》,《世界经济研究》2011年第8期,第62~75页
[7]Krugman,P..Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.Journal of Political Economy,1991,(3):pp.483~499.
[8]Ghosh,D.K.,Ghosh,S..Optimum Choice of an MNC:Location and Investment.The American Economist,1997,(2):pp.41~46.
[9]Pfann,G.,Kranenburg,H.V..Tax Policy,Location Choices,and Market Structure.Journal of Law and Economics,2003,46(1):pp.61~84.
[10]Bobonis,G.J.,Shatz,H.J..Agglomeration,Adjustment,and State Policies in the Location of Foreign Direct Investmentin the United States.The Review of Economics and Statistics,2007,(1):pp.30~43.
[11]Baldwin,R.,Okubo,T..Tax Reform,Delocation,and Heterogeneous Firms.The Scandinavian Journal of Economics,2009,(4):pp.741~764.
[12]Jordan,J.A..Agglomerationandthe Location Choiceof Foreign Direct Investmen:New evidence From Manufactoring FDI in Mexico.Estudios Economics,2012,(1):pp.61-97.
[13]罗云辉:《地区间招商引资优惠政策竞争与先发优势》,《经济科学》2009年第5期,第96~106页
[14]杨晓丽许垒:《中国式分权下地方政府FDI税收竞争的策略性及其经济增长效应》,《经济评论》2011年第3期,第59~68页
[15]Gale,D.,Shapley,L.S..College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage.American Mathematical Monthly,1962,(1):pp.9~15.
[16]Abdulkadiroglu,A.,Sonmez,T..School Choice:A Mechanism Design Approach.American Economic Review,2002,(3):pp.729~747.
[17]Abdulkadiroglu,A.,Pathak,P.A.,Roth,A.E.,Sonmez,T..The Boston Public School Match.American Economic Review,2005,(2):pp.368~371.
[18]Abdulkadiroglu,A.,Pathak,P.A.,Roth,A.E..The New York City High School Match.American Economic Review,2005,(2):pp.364~367.
[19]张米尔王德鲁:《产业转型中项目机会研究的匹配矩阵方法》,《数量经济技术经济研究》2003年第9期,第138~142页
[20]曹国华胡义:《风险投资家和创业者的双边匹配模型研究》,《科技进步与对策》2009年第6期,第28~30页
[21]陈希等:《考虑关联性指标的双边匹配决策方法》,《运筹与管理》2012年第6期,第94~99页
[22]Roth,A.E..The Economics of Matching:Stability and Incentives.Mathematics of Operations Research,1982,(4):pp.617~628.
1数据来源于《中国区域经济统计年鉴·2013》。
1数据来源:《中国开发区年鉴·2013》。
2 SAR和SEM模型使用最大似然估计方法。
3 用于检验残差项空间自相关的统计量Moran’s I=n∑n i=1∑n j=1wij(εi-ε)(εj-ε)/∑n i=1∑n j=1wij∑n i=1(εi-ε)2 ,ε为残差。