农村居民政治参与对人情支出影响研究
|
摘要
人情支出在我国居民消费结构中占据重要地位。本文以2014年中国家庭追踪调查农户样本为研究对象,利用倾向得分匹配和分位数回归研究了政治参与对农户家庭人情支出的影响。研究发现:农村居民参与政治生活对农户家庭人情支出有显著正向影响,政治参与对人情支出的影响随人情支出水平的提高先下降后上升,呈现出U型趋势,对低人情支出与高人情支出农户的影响更为显著。地区差异方面,东部地区政治参与变量对农户人情支出影响显著高于中、西部地区。除了农村居民政治参与行为外,农户家庭经济状况、社会网络等因素同样对农户人情支出有显著影响。
Gift expenditure in China's consumer structure occupies an important position.Based on the sample of China's Family Tracking Survey(CFPS)in 2014,this paper uses the Propensity Score Matching(PSM)method to solve the sample self-selection bias and uses the quantile regression model to analyze the impact of political participation on gift expenditure.The results show that rural residents'participation in political life has a significant positive impact on households'gift expenditure.The influence of political participation on the gift expenditure rises firstly and then decrease with the increase of human expenditure level,which shows the ushaped trend,and it is more significant for the farmers with low and high gift expenditure.Besides,the influence of political participation on gift expenditure in east of China is higher than west and central of China.In addition to the rural residents of the political participation behavior,the farmer family economic situation,social network also have effects on farmer's gift expenditure.
Gift expenditure in China's consumer structure occupies an important position.Based on the sample of China's Family Tracking Survey(CFPS)in 2014,this paper uses the Propensity Score Matching(PSM)method to solve the sample self-selection bias and uses the quantile regression model to analyze the impact of political participation on gift expenditure.The results show that rural residents'participation in political life has a significant positive impact on households'gift expenditure.The influence of political participation on the gift expenditure rises firstly and then decrease with the increase of human expenditure level,which shows the ushaped trend,and it is more significant for the farmers with low and high gift expenditure.Besides,the influence of political participation on gift expenditure in east of China is higher than west and central of China.In addition to the rural residents of the political participation behavior,the farmer family economic situation,social network also have effects on farmer's gift expenditure.
引文
[1]胡晨沛,朱玮强,顾蕾.个人收入、家庭资产与农村居民幸福感---基于CGSS2013的实证研究[J].调研世界,2017,(04):41-49.
[2]刘东皇,沈坤荣.劳动收入占比与居民消费率:机理与中国经验[J].社会科学研究,2017,(01):15-21.
[3]费孝通.乡土中国[M].北京:人民出版社,2008.
[4]周广肃,马光荣.人情支出挤出了正常消费吗?--来自中国家户数据的证据[J].浙江社会科学,2015,(03):15-26+156.
[5]曾起艳,孙凯,曾寅初.人情消费能使我们幸福吗?[J].消费经济,2017,33(02):17-24.
[6]张同龙,张林秀.村委会选举中的村民投票行为、投票过程及其决定因素---基于全国5省100村2000户调查数据的实证研究[J].管理世界,2013,(04):59-68+81.
[7]易行健,张波,杨汝岱,杨碧云.家庭社会网络与农户储蓄行为:基于中国农村的实证研究[J].管理世界,2012,(05):43-51+187.
[8]杭斌.人情支出与城镇居民家庭消费--基于地位寻求的实证分析[J].统计研究,2015,32(04):68-76.
[9]章元,陆铭.社会网络是否有助于提高农民工的工资水平?[J].管理世界,2009,(03):45-54.
[10]马光荣,杨恩艳.社会网络、非正规金融与创业[J].经济研究,2011,46(03):83-94.
[11]胡荣.中国农村居民的红白喜事网及其影响因素研究[J].社会学评论,2013,1(03):49-58.
[12]赖凯声,孙晓冬.中国城乡家庭人情消费及其影响因素研究---基于CGSS2010数据的实证分析[J].消费经济,2016,32(05):9-15.
[13]林晓珊.重返消费政治:消费不平等研究的历史逻辑[J].广东社会科学,2016,(03):203-212.
[14]范广垠,童星.论消费行为的政治动因[J].社会科学研究,2015,(03):66-70.
[15]范广垠.消费社会对现代政治的解构---齐格蒙特·鲍曼的消费政治思想简析[J].马克思主义与现实,2013,(05):128-133.
[16]孙昕,徐志刚,陶然,苏福兵.政治信任、社会资本和村民选举参与---基于全国代表性样本调查的实证分析[J].社会学研究,2007,(04):165-187+245.
[2]刘东皇,沈坤荣.劳动收入占比与居民消费率:机理与中国经验[J].社会科学研究,2017,(01):15-21.
[3]费孝通.乡土中国[M].北京:人民出版社,2008.
[4]周广肃,马光荣.人情支出挤出了正常消费吗?--来自中国家户数据的证据[J].浙江社会科学,2015,(03):15-26+156.
[5]曾起艳,孙凯,曾寅初.人情消费能使我们幸福吗?[J].消费经济,2017,33(02):17-24.
[6]张同龙,张林秀.村委会选举中的村民投票行为、投票过程及其决定因素---基于全国5省100村2000户调查数据的实证研究[J].管理世界,2013,(04):59-68+81.
[7]易行健,张波,杨汝岱,杨碧云.家庭社会网络与农户储蓄行为:基于中国农村的实证研究[J].管理世界,2012,(05):43-51+187.
[8]杭斌.人情支出与城镇居民家庭消费--基于地位寻求的实证分析[J].统计研究,2015,32(04):68-76.
[9]章元,陆铭.社会网络是否有助于提高农民工的工资水平?[J].管理世界,2009,(03):45-54.
[10]马光荣,杨恩艳.社会网络、非正规金融与创业[J].经济研究,2011,46(03):83-94.
[11]胡荣.中国农村居民的红白喜事网及其影响因素研究[J].社会学评论,2013,1(03):49-58.
[12]赖凯声,孙晓冬.中国城乡家庭人情消费及其影响因素研究---基于CGSS2010数据的实证分析[J].消费经济,2016,32(05):9-15.
[13]林晓珊.重返消费政治:消费不平等研究的历史逻辑[J].广东社会科学,2016,(03):203-212.
[14]范广垠,童星.论消费行为的政治动因[J].社会科学研究,2015,(03):66-70.
[15]范广垠.消费社会对现代政治的解构---齐格蒙特·鲍曼的消费政治思想简析[J].马克思主义与现实,2013,(05):128-133.
[16]孙昕,徐志刚,陶然,苏福兵.政治信任、社会资本和村民选举参与---基于全国代表性样本调查的实证分析[J].社会学研究,2007,(04):165-187+245.