国内学者影响力评价Altmetrics指标研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The Evaluation of Chinese Scholars’ Influence by Altmetrics Index
  • 作者:郭颖 ; 肖仙桃
  • 英文作者:Guo Ying;
  • 关键词:学者评价 ; Altmetrics ; 中国学者 ; 学者影响力
  • 英文关键词:scholar evaluation;;Altmetrics;;Chinese scholars;;scholars' influence
  • 中文刊名:QBLL
  • 英文刊名:Information Studies:Theory & Application
  • 机构:中国科学院兰州文献情报中心;中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系;
  • 出版日期:2018-12-06 14:35
  • 出版单位:情报理论与实践
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.42;No.303
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:QBLL201904012
  • 页数:7
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:11-1762/G3
  • 分类号:68-74
摘要
[目的/意义]利用Altmetrics对学者影响力进行评价已得到广泛认可,但现有Altmetrics指标均来自于国外网络平台,由于我国政策和语言差异,我国学者对其使用较少,导致已有的指标体系不适用于我国学者的评价,因此文章参照国外Altmetrics指标体系构建了适合我国学者影响力评价的Altmetrics指标体系。[方法/过程]文章在分析国外Altmetrics指标来源平台的基础上,从国内相似平台的代表性平台中选取Altmetrics指标,引入因子分析法筛选指标并确定权重以构建指标体系,利用相关性检验和二维评价方法对所得指标体系进行验证。[结果/结论]以上方法所构建的指标体系可以用于我国学者影响力评价,但评价层面不同于传统文献计量指标,二者互为补充。
        [Purpose/significance] The use of Altmetrics to evaluate the influence of scholars has been widely recognized.However,the existing Altmetrics indicators are from foreign network platforms.Due to the policy and language differences,Chinese scholars hardly use them,which cause the existing Altmetrics indicator system unsuitable to evaluate Chinese scholars.Therefore,by referring to the foreign Altmetrics index system,this paper constructs the Altmetrics index system that is suitable for the in-fluence evaluation of Chinese scholars.[Method/process] Based on the analysis of the Altmetrics indicators source platforms abroad,the paper selects the Altmetrics index from the similar representative platforms in China,introduces the factor analysis method to filter the indicators,determine the weights,and construct the index system,and uses the correlation test and two-dimensional evaluation method to verify the final index system.[Result/conclusion] The index system constructed can be used to evaluate the influence of Chinese scholars,but the evaluation level is different from the traditional bibliometric indicators.The Altmetrics index system constructed in this paper and the traditional bibliometric indicators are complementary to each other.
引文
[1] 邱均平,余厚强.替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(19):5-12.
    [2] YU M C,WU Y C J,ALHALABI W,et al.Research Gate:an effective altmetric indicator for active researchers?[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2016,55:1001-1006.
    [3] HARDY M C,DESSELLE M R.Engaging rural Australian communities in National Science Week helps increase visibility for women researchers[J].Royal Society Open Science,2017,4(10).
    [4] BORNMANN L,HAUNSCHILD R.T factor:a metric for measuring impact on Twitter[J].Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science,2015,21(2):13-20.
    [5] ORTEGA J L.Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites:the case of CSIC’s members[J].Journal of Informetrics,2015,9(1):39-49.
    [6] SOTUDEH H,MAZAREI Z,MIRZABEIGI M.CiteULike bookmarks are correlated to citations at journal and author levels in library and information science[J].Scientometrics,2015,105(3):2237-2248.
    [7] 王妍.学者影响力二维测度方法研究[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(12):88-92.
    [8] 曹丽江.基于Altmetrics的学者影响力综合评价研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2017.
    [9] 杨柳,丁楠,田稷.Altmetrics视角下机构知识库学者影响力评价研究[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(6):104-110.
    [10] 中国知网.期刊高级检索[EB/OL].[2018-03-29].http://kns.cnki.net/kns/brief/result.aspx?dbprefix=CJFQ.
    [11] 关于科学网[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://www.sciencenet.cn/aboutus/default.aspx?id=1&type=1.
    [12] 36氪.微信2017数据报告:9月日均登录9.02亿人,日均发送消息380亿次[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://36kr.com/p/5102004.html.
    [13] 猎豹大数据.2017年社交类APP排行榜[EB/OL].[2018-03-28].http://cn.data.cmcm.com/rank.
    [14] 艾瑞数据.艾瑞指数[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://index.iresearch.com.cn/.
    [15] 36氪.微博Q3营收阿里贡献了不少,净利润同比增长215%[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://36kr.com/p/5101612.html.
    [16] 百度百科.首页[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].https://baike.baidu.com/.
    [17] 东方网.中国新闻网站排行榜[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://sh.eastday.com/qhtyzt/wzcbl7/.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700