审判中心主义语境下认罪认罚从宽制度的完善
|
摘要
认罪认罚从宽制度体现了以庭审为中心的基本理念,遵循了优化司法资源的基本要求,坚持了保障人权的基本导向,彰显了程序正义的基本内涵,与推进以审判为中心的刑事诉讼改革形成呼应。鉴于我国认罪认罚制度在司法实践中仍面临诸多挑战,建议从审查方式、证明标准、值班律师制度和检察机关职能等方面来完善认罪认罚从宽制度,以便进一步落实宽严相济的刑事政策,合理配置司法资源,及时惩罚犯罪,加强人权保障,推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革。
The lenient system of admission of guilt and punishment embodies the basic idea of taking trial as the center, follows the basic requirements of optimizing judicial resources, adheres to the basic orientation of protecting human rights, highlights the basic connotation of procedural justice, and echoes the reform of criminal procedure centered on trial. In view of the challenges still faced by the system of admission of guilt and punishment in judicial practice in China, it is suggested that the lenient system of admission of guilt and punishment should be perfected from the aspects of examination method, proof standard, duty lawyer system and the functions of procuratorial organs, so as to further implement the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity, rationally allocate judicial resources, timely punish crimes, strengthen human rights protection, and promote the trial-centered litigation system reform.
The lenient system of admission of guilt and punishment embodies the basic idea of taking trial as the center, follows the basic requirements of optimizing judicial resources, adheres to the basic orientation of protecting human rights, highlights the basic connotation of procedural justice, and echoes the reform of criminal procedure centered on trial. In view of the challenges still faced by the system of admission of guilt and punishment in judicial practice in China, it is suggested that the lenient system of admission of guilt and punishment should be perfected from the aspects of examination method, proof standard, duty lawyer system and the functions of procuratorial organs, so as to further implement the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity, rationally allocate judicial resources, timely punish crimes, strengthen human rights protection, and promote the trial-centered litigation system reform.
引文
[1] 戴长林,刘静坤.《关于全面推进以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革的实施意见》的理解与适用[J].人民司法(应用),2017(10):22-34.
[2] 樊崇义.认罪认罚从宽协商程序的独立地位与保障机制[J].国家检察官学院学报,2018(1):110-122.
[3] 何群,储槐植.认罪认罚从宽制度的实体法解读:从刑事一体化的视角[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018(6):91-95.
[4] 顾永忠,韩笑.检察机关贯彻认罪认罚从宽具有“地缘优势”[N].检察日报,2019-01-20(3).
[5] 黄丽华.五峰:首例认罪认罚速裁案庭审16分钟、从诉到判17天[EB/OL].(2018-12-3)[2019-05-17].http://www.hbjc.gov.cn/jcgg/201812/t20181203-1374498.shtml.
[6] 汪海燕.认罪认罚从宽案件证明标准研究[J].比较法研究,2018(5):71-81.
[7] 樊崇义,李思远.认罪认罚从宽制度的理论反思与改革前瞻[J].华东政法大学学报,2017(4):6-12.
[8] 陈卫东.认罪认罚从宽制度研究[J].中国法学,2016(2):48-64.
[9] 陈光中,马康.认罪认罚从宽制度若干重要问题探讨[J].法学,2016(8):3-11.
[10] 卞建林,谢澍.职权主义诉讼模式中的认罪认罚从宽[J].比较法研究,2018(3):119-129.
[11] 韩旭.2018年刑诉法中认罪认罚从宽制度[J].法治研究,2019(1):35-45.
[12] 吴小军.认罪认罚从宽制度的实践反思与路径完善[J].法律适用,2018(15):77-87.
[2] 樊崇义.认罪认罚从宽协商程序的独立地位与保障机制[J].国家检察官学院学报,2018(1):110-122.
[3] 何群,储槐植.认罪认罚从宽制度的实体法解读:从刑事一体化的视角[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018(6):91-95.
[4] 顾永忠,韩笑.检察机关贯彻认罪认罚从宽具有“地缘优势”[N].检察日报,2019-01-20(3).
[5] 黄丽华.五峰:首例认罪认罚速裁案庭审16分钟、从诉到判17天[EB/OL].(2018-12-3)[2019-05-17].http://www.hbjc.gov.cn/jcgg/201812/t20181203-1374498.shtml.
[6] 汪海燕.认罪认罚从宽案件证明标准研究[J].比较法研究,2018(5):71-81.
[7] 樊崇义,李思远.认罪认罚从宽制度的理论反思与改革前瞻[J].华东政法大学学报,2017(4):6-12.
[8] 陈卫东.认罪认罚从宽制度研究[J].中国法学,2016(2):48-64.
[9] 陈光中,马康.认罪认罚从宽制度若干重要问题探讨[J].法学,2016(8):3-11.
[10] 卞建林,谢澍.职权主义诉讼模式中的认罪认罚从宽[J].比较法研究,2018(3):119-129.
[11] 韩旭.2018年刑诉法中认罪认罚从宽制度[J].法治研究,2019(1):35-45.
[12] 吴小军.认罪认罚从宽制度的实践反思与路径完善[J].法律适用,2018(15):77-87.