齐《诗》“五际”说新探
|
摘要
在西汉今文三家《诗》中,齐《诗》最能反映汉代诗学的特征。这种特征主要表现在阴阳五行思想对诗学的影响,其代表性思想就是齐《诗》的"五际"说。"五际"说与律历、性情等思想有着密切关系,其具体内容应该指仁、义、礼、智、信"五性",这与《诗纬》中的"四始五际"说是不同的。二者虽然都运用了阴阳五行学说,但侧重不同:齐《诗》"五际"说的根据主要是阴阳说,《诗纬》"五际"说的基础则主要是五行说。
Qi-shi can best reflect the characteristics of poetics of the Western Han dynasty among the three schools at interpreting The Book of Songs. These characteristics mainly reveal the influence of Yin-yang theory and Five-element thought on poetics,of which the most typical is the five-factor theory in Qi-shi. The five-factor theory is closely related to the ideas of musical temperament,calendar and others,mainly including benevolence,righteousness,courtesy,wisdom and faith,which is different from the four-original-text theory and the five-factor theory in Shiwei. Although both of them use Yin-yang theory and Five-element thought,they have different focuses: the former mainly relies on Yin-yang theory,while the latter is rooted in the five-factor theory.
Qi-shi can best reflect the characteristics of poetics of the Western Han dynasty among the three schools at interpreting The Book of Songs. These characteristics mainly reveal the influence of Yin-yang theory and Five-element thought on poetics,of which the most typical is the five-factor theory in Qi-shi. The five-factor theory is closely related to the ideas of musical temperament,calendar and others,mainly including benevolence,righteousness,courtesy,wisdom and faith,which is different from the four-original-text theory and the five-factor theory in Shiwei. Although both of them use Yin-yang theory and Five-element thought,they have different focuses: the former mainly relies on Yin-yang theory,while the latter is rooted in the five-factor theory.
引文
[1][清]王先谦.汉书补注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2012.
[2]刘师培.齐诗历用颛顼说[J].四川国学杂志,1912(4).
[3]郜积意.两汉经学的历术背景[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013.
[4][日]中村璋八.五行大義校注(增订版)[M].东京:汲古书院,1998.
[5]吴承仕.经典释文序録疏证[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[6]徐复观.徐复观论经学史二种[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2005.
[7]任蜜林.汉代秘经:纬书思想分论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2015.
[8][日]安居香山.緯書の成立とその展開[M].东京:东京图书刊行社,1979.
[9]王长华、刘明.《诗纬》与《齐诗》关系考论[J].文学评论,2009(2).
[10]邵瑞彭.齐诗钤[J].儒效月刊,1936第2卷5期.
(1)对于《诗纬》与齐《诗》的关系,可参看安居香山《緯書の成立とその展開》[8](P149-191)、王长华、刘明《〈诗纬〉与〈齐诗〉关系考论》[9]、任蜜林《汉代秘经:纬书思想分论》[7](P218224)的相关论述。
(1)关于“四始五际”说的详细解说,可以参看任蜜林《汉代“秘经”:纬书思想分论》[7](P225-236)的相关论述。
[2]刘师培.齐诗历用颛顼说[J].四川国学杂志,1912(4).
[3]郜积意.两汉经学的历术背景[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013.
[4][日]中村璋八.五行大義校注(增订版)[M].东京:汲古书院,1998.
[5]吴承仕.经典释文序録疏证[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[6]徐复观.徐复观论经学史二种[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2005.
[7]任蜜林.汉代秘经:纬书思想分论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2015.
[8][日]安居香山.緯書の成立とその展開[M].东京:东京图书刊行社,1979.
[9]王长华、刘明.《诗纬》与《齐诗》关系考论[J].文学评论,2009(2).
[10]邵瑞彭.齐诗钤[J].儒效月刊,1936第2卷5期.
(1)对于《诗纬》与齐《诗》的关系,可参看安居香山《緯書の成立とその展開》[8](P149-191)、王长华、刘明《〈诗纬〉与〈齐诗〉关系考论》[9]、任蜜林《汉代秘经:纬书思想分论》[7](P218224)的相关论述。
(1)关于“四始五际”说的详细解说,可以参看任蜜林《汉代“秘经”:纬书思想分论》[7](P225-236)的相关论述。