用户名: 密码: 验证码:
企业财务绩效期望落差与风险战略行为研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on the expectation gap of enterprise financial performance and risk strategic behavior
  • 作者:范凯
  • 英文作者:Fan Kai;Nanjing Wondux Environmental Technology Co.Ltd.;
  • 关键词:实际绩效 ; 期望绩效 ; 风险战略 ; 企业性质 ; 成立年限
  • 英文关键词:Actual performance;;Expected performance;;Risk strategy;;Nature of the enterprise;;Establishment of fixed number of year
  • 中文刊名:JSFA
  • 英文刊名:Textile Reports
  • 机构:南京万德斯环保科技股份有限公司;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-20
  • 出版单位:纺织报告
  • 年:2019
  • 期:No.424
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JSFA201901010
  • 页数:5
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:32-1853/TS
  • 分类号:33-36+51
摘要
本课题从合法性和组织结构惰性视角探讨了企业的实际绩效低于期望绩效的水平对企业实施风险战略行为的影响机制;还探讨了企业性质和成立年限对上述两者关系的调节作用。基于2008~2013年中国沪深两市A股市场上市公司的样本实证分析:与非国有企业相比,当企业实际绩效低于期望绩效时,两者之间的差距越大,国有企业会承担更多的风险行为。而与成立年限较长的企业相比,当企业实际绩效低于期望绩效时,两者之间的差距越大,成立年限较短的企业会承担更多的风险行为。该研究结论不仅在一定程度上整合了现有关于实际绩效低于期望绩效的水平与企业风险战略行为不一致的研究结果,在实践层面上也为利益相关者预测企业的行为提供了重要的指导意义。
        From the perspective of legitimacy and organizational structure inertia, this paper discusses the influence mechanism of the actual performance of an enterprise lower than the expected performance on the implementation of risk strategic behavior.At the same time, this paper also discusses the nature of the enterprise and the establishment of the years of adjustment of the relationship between the two.The empirical analysis results based on the samples of a-share listed companies in Shanghai and shenzhen stock markets of China from 2008 to 2013 show that, compared with nonstate-owned enterprises, when the actual performance of enterprises is lower than the expected performance, the gap between the two will be larger and state-owned enterprises will take more risk behaviors.When the actual performance of an enterprise is lower than the expected performance than that of an enterprise with a long establishment year, the gap between the two will be larger, and the enterprise with a short establishment year will take more risk behaviors.The research conclusion not only integrates the existing research results on the inconsistency between the actual performance lower than the expected performance and the enterprise risk strategic behavior to some extent, but also provides important guidance for stakeholders to predict the enterprise behavior on the practical level.
引文
[1]刘文彬,唐杰.绩效反馈对新生代员工反生产行为的影响机制——反馈效价视角的理论模型与案例研究.经济管理,2015(6):2-7.
    [2]王菁,程博,孙元欣.期望绩效反馈效果对企业研发和慈善捐赠行为的影响.管理世界,2014(8):21-23.
    [3] Zajac, E. J, Kraatz, M. S. A Diametric Forces Model of Strategic Change:Assessing the Antecedents and Consequences of Restructuring in the Higher Education Industry. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(51):83-102.
    [4] Sitkin, S. B. Learning through Failure-the Strategy of Small Losses. Research in organizational behavior, 1992,14:231-266.
    [5]连燕玲,贺小刚,高皓.业绩期望差距与企业战略调整——基于中国上市公司的实证研究.管理世界,2014(11):45-47.
    [6] Ketchen, D.J.,Palmer, T. B. Strategic Responses to Poor Organizational Performance:A Test of Competing Perspectives. Journal of Management, 1999,25(5):683-706.
    [7] Wiseman, R. M., Bromiley, P. Toward a Model of Risk in Declining Organizations:An Empirical Examination of Risk, Performance and Decline. Organization Science, 1996,7(5):524-543.
    [8] Miller, K. D., Chen, W.-R. Variable Organizational Risk Preferences:Tests of the March-Shapira Model. Academy of Management Journal, 2004,47(1):105-115.
    [9] Audia, P. G., Greve, H. R. Less Likely to Fail:Low Performance, Firm Size, and Factory Expansion in the Shipbuilding Industry. Management Science,2006,52(1):83-94.
    [10] Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J. Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. American sociological review, 1984:149-164.
    [11]Cyert, R. M., March,J. G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963,2.
    [12] Boeker, W., Goodstein, J. Organizational Performance and Adaptation:Effects of Environment and Performance on Changes in Board Composition. Academy of Management Journal, 1991,34(4):805-826.
    [13] Greve, H. R. Sticky Aspirations:Organizational Time Perspective and Competitiveness. Organization Science, 2002,13(1):1-17.
    [14] Harrison, D. A., Klein, K. J. What's the Difference? Diversity Constructs as Separation, Variety,or Disparity in Organizations. Academy of management review, 2007,32(4):1199-1228.
    [15] Greve, H. R. 1996. Performance, Aspirations and Risky Organizational Change. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
    [16] Li, H., Zhang, Y. The Role of Managers Political Networking and Functional Experience in New Venture Performance:Evidence from Chinas Transition Economy. Strategic Management Journal, 2007,28(8):791.
    [17] Ma, D., Parish, W. L. Tocquevillian Moments:Charitable Contributions by Chinese Private Entrepreneurs. Social Forces, 2006,85(2):943-964.
    [18] Rao, H. The Social Construction of Reputation:Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry:1895-1912. Strategic Management Journal, 1994,15(S1):29-44.
    [19]王利平,葛建华.合法性视角下的国有企业组织制度变迁.管理学报,2009(4):17-18.
    [20] Nee, V. Organizational Dynamics of Market Transition:Hybrid Forms, Property Rights, and Mixed Economy in China. Administrative science quarterly,1992:1-27.
    [21]李晨曦.浅析纺织企业财务风险与防范措施[J].纺织报告,2018(4):43-44.
    [22] Schneider,J.,Gilbert, S. C., Blanchard, T.J.,Hanke, T., Robson, K.J.,Hannan, C.M., Becker, M.,Sinden, R., Smith, G. L., Hill, A. V. Enhanced Immunogenicity for Cd8+T Cell Induction and Complete Protective Efficacy of Malaria DNA Vaccination by Boosting with Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara. Nature medicine, 1998,4(4):397-402.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700