Scoping Review报告规范简介
|
摘要
Scoping Review是一种有效的证据识别与综合方法,能很好的适用于尚未被广泛研究或具有复杂异质性的主题,但Scoping review的报告质量低是阻碍其发展的一大难题。本文旨在通过实例解读优先报告条目PRISMA—ScR清单,以期为国内相关研究人员提供借鉴与参考。
Scoping review is an effective method to identify and synthesize the evidence,which can be applied to the topics that have not been extensively studied or have complex heterogeneity,but the low quality of the scoping review is a major obstacle to its development. This study aims to provide reference for domestic researchers by interpreting of scoping review report checklist.
Scoping review is an effective method to identify and synthesize the evidence,which can be applied to the topics that have not been extensively studied or have complex heterogeneity,but the low quality of the scoping review is a major obstacle to its development. This study aims to provide reference for domestic researchers by interpreting of scoping review report checklist.
引文
[1]田金徽,陈耀龙,杨克虎,等. SR/MA研究进展与挑战[J].兰州大学学报(医学版),2016,42(1):42-47.
[2] Petticrew M. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology:myths and misconceptions[J]. BMJ,2001,322(7278):98-101.
[3]韦当,王琪,孙丽娜,等.从循证决策到知证决策[J].甘肃科技,2013,29(17):139-140.
[4]李思源,季婷,拜争刚,等.循证实践在我国社会科学领域的研究现状分析[J].中国社会医学杂志,2017,34(6):529-532.
[5] Levac D,Colquhoun H,O'Brien KK. Scoping studies:advancing the methodology[J]. Implement Sci,2010,5(1):69.
[6] Arksey H,O'Malley L. Scoping studies:towards a methodological framework[J]. Int J Soc Res Methodol,2005,8(1):19-32.
[7]卞薇,陈慧,宋国敏,等.概况性评价简介[J].中国循证医学杂志,2017,17(4):488-493.
[8] Daudt HM,van Mossel C,Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology:a large,inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2013,13(1):48.
[9] Tricco AC,Lillie E,Zarin W,et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews(PRISMA-ScR):checklist and explanation[J]. Annals of Internal Medicine,2018.
[10] Suhonen R,Stolt M,Habermann M,et al. Ethical elements in priority setting in nursing care:A scoping review[J]. Int J Nurs Stud,2018,88:25-42
[11]张珺,葛龙,赵晔,等. PRISMA系列报告规范简介[J].中国药物评价,2015,32(5):257-261.
[12]赵晔,葛龙,张珺,等.单个病例数据系统评价/Meta分析优先报告条目简介[J].中国药物评价,2015,32(5):262-265.
[13]田金徽,葛龙,赵晔,等.网状Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA扩展声明解读[J].中国药物评价,2015,32(5):266-272.
[14] Moher D,Schulz KF,Simera I,et al. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines[J]. Plo S Med,2010,7(2):e1000217.
[2] Petticrew M. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology:myths and misconceptions[J]. BMJ,2001,322(7278):98-101.
[3]韦当,王琪,孙丽娜,等.从循证决策到知证决策[J].甘肃科技,2013,29(17):139-140.
[4]李思源,季婷,拜争刚,等.循证实践在我国社会科学领域的研究现状分析[J].中国社会医学杂志,2017,34(6):529-532.
[5] Levac D,Colquhoun H,O'Brien KK. Scoping studies:advancing the methodology[J]. Implement Sci,2010,5(1):69.
[6] Arksey H,O'Malley L. Scoping studies:towards a methodological framework[J]. Int J Soc Res Methodol,2005,8(1):19-32.
[7]卞薇,陈慧,宋国敏,等.概况性评价简介[J].中国循证医学杂志,2017,17(4):488-493.
[8] Daudt HM,van Mossel C,Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology:a large,inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2013,13(1):48.
[9] Tricco AC,Lillie E,Zarin W,et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews(PRISMA-ScR):checklist and explanation[J]. Annals of Internal Medicine,2018.
[10] Suhonen R,Stolt M,Habermann M,et al. Ethical elements in priority setting in nursing care:A scoping review[J]. Int J Nurs Stud,2018,88:25-42
[11]张珺,葛龙,赵晔,等. PRISMA系列报告规范简介[J].中国药物评价,2015,32(5):257-261.
[12]赵晔,葛龙,张珺,等.单个病例数据系统评价/Meta分析优先报告条目简介[J].中国药物评价,2015,32(5):262-265.
[13]田金徽,葛龙,赵晔,等.网状Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA扩展声明解读[J].中国药物评价,2015,32(5):266-272.
[14] Moher D,Schulz KF,Simera I,et al. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines[J]. Plo S Med,2010,7(2):e1000217.