煤矿安全诚信测量模型
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Measurement model for coal mine safety integrity
  • 作者:魏志杰 ; 殷腾飞 ; 王立杰
  • 英文作者:WEI Zhijie;YIN Tengfei;WANG Lijie;School of Management,China University of Mining & Technology(Beijing);School of Management,Xi'an University of Finance and Economics;
  • 关键词:煤矿 ; 安全诚信 ; 测量模型 ; 因子分析(CFA) ; 调查问卷
  • 英文关键词:coal mine;;safety integrity;;measurement model;;confirmatory factor analysis(CFA);;questionnaire
  • 中文刊名:ZAQK
  • 英文刊名:China Safety Science Journal
  • 机构:中国矿业大学(北京)管理学院;西安财经大学管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-15
  • 出版单位:中国安全科学学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.29
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZAQK201903030
  • 页数:6
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:11-2865/X
  • 分类号:153-158
摘要
为准确评价煤矿安全诚信水平,首先,参考煤矿安全诚信评价的相关成果,明确安全诚信文化、管理制度建设、教育与培训、保障与监督等4个评价维度;其次,从这4个维度构建安全诚信测量模型,并采用李克特5级量表法,根据4个维度(潜变量)设计观测变量,形成调查问卷;然后,以冀中能源集团所属2个煤矿为样本开展调查,用调查数据验证测量模型的合理性;最后,采用验证性因子分析(CFA)法处理数据。研究结果表明:样本数据与测量模型的适配度较好,观测变量能够较为稳定地反映潜变量; 4个评价维度能够较好地体现煤矿的安全诚信管理水平。
        The paper was aimed at precisely evaluate safety integrity of coal mines. Firstly,on the basis of analysing related research results,four evaluation dimensions were determined: safety integrity culture,management system construction,education and training,and safety supervision. Secondly,a measurement model was established based on these four dimensions,and the questionnaire was made according to the Likert five-level scale technology and several observational variables. Then two coal mines of Jizhong Energy Group Company were taken as samples to conduct survey,and survey data was obtained to verify the model. Finally,the CFA method was used to process data. The results show that sample data matches well with the measurement model and observational variables can describe latent variables,and that the four evaluation dimensions can reflect the management level of coal mine safety integrity.
引文
[1]成连华,赵帅,吴锋,等.知识型和经验型矿工群体的不安全行为研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(12):1-7.CHENG Lianhua,ZHAO Shuai,WU Feng et al. Unsafe behavior of knowledge miners and experience miners[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2017,27(12):1-7.
    [2]刘素霞,朱雨晴,梅强.损失认知、安全态度与企业安全生产行为关系研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(10):123-129.LIU Suxia,ZHU Yuqing,MEI Qiang. Relationships between perception of loss,safety attitude and enterprises'work safety behavior[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2017,27(10):123-129.
    [3]成连华,郭慧敏.基于SEM的煤矿安全生产影响因素系统研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(1):137-142.CHENG Lianhua,GUO Huimin. Study on factors influencing coal mine work safety based on SEM[J]. China Safety Science Jounal,2018,28(1):137-142.
    [4]王社平,刘尚林,班士杰,等.煤矿安全诚信管理[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2009:53.
    [5]季佩佩,李新春.煤矿企业员工安全诚信体系建设的研究[J].煤矿安全,2010,41(10):122-125.
    [6]程东全,顾锋.基于贝叶斯网络的煤矿安全诚信评价模型[J].安全与环境学报,2011,11(4):230-233.CHENG Dongquan,GU Feng.Coal mine safety integrity evaluation model based on Bayesian networks[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment,2011,11(4):230-233.
    [7]姚永强,杨玉中,孟祥中.煤矿安全诚信评价指标体系研究[J].煤矿安全,2011,42(6):181-184.
    [8]刘宏,尹智坚.煤矿企业员工安全诚信动机的测评研究[J].中国煤炭,2016,42(3):110-114.LIU Hong,YIN Zhijian. Study on the evaluation of safety credibility motivation of employee of coal mine[J].China Coal,2016,42(3):110-114.
    [9]尹智坚.员工安全诚信的测评研究[D].镇江:江苏大学,2016.YIN Zhijian.Study on the evaluation of employee safety integrity[D].Zhenjiang:Jiangsu University,2016.
    [10] CAMARA W J,SCHNEIDER D L. Integrity tests:facts and unresolved issues[J]. American Psychology,1994,49:112-119.
    [11] SACKETT P R,WANEK J E. New developments in the use of measures of honesty,integrity,conscientiousness,dependability,trustworthiness,and reliability for personnel selection[J]. Personnel Psychology,1996,49:787-829.
    [12] SACKETT P R,BUMS L R,Callahan C. Integrity testing for personnel selection:an update[J]. Personnel Psychology,1989,42:491-529.
    [13] ONES D S,VISWESVARAN C,SCHMIDT F. Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities:findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph,1993,78:679-703.
    [14] MARCUS B,HOFT S,RIEDIQER M. Integrity tests and the five-factor model of personality:a review and empirical test of two alternative positions[J].International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2006,14(2):113-130.
    [15] CONNELLY B S,LILIENFELD S O,SCHMEELK K M. Integrity tests and morality:associations with ego development,moral reasoning,and psychopathic personality[J]. International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2006,14(1):82-86.
    [16]国家安全生产监督总局.推进煤矿企业安全生产诚信建设的指导意见[Z].2009.
    [17]陈萍,李亚.事故致因“2-4”模型的形成及其版本演变[J].工业安全与环保,2017,43(7):51-54.CHEN Ping,LI Ya. Research on the formation and version evolution of 24 model[J]. Industrial Safety and Environment Protection,2017,43(7):51-54.
    [18]小卡尔.迈克丹尼尔,罗杰,盖兹[美].当代市场调研[M].李桂华,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2000:93-120.CARL Mcdaniel Jr,ROGER Gates. Marketing research[M]. LI Guihua,Translated. Beijing:Mechanical Industry Press,2000:93-120.
    [19]黄芳铭.结构方程模式——理论与应用[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2005:125-153.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700