社会支持能否缓解支出型贫困——来自陕西省的证据
|
摘要
支出型贫困是打赢脱贫攻坚战的重点和难点。本文基于社会支持、生计恢复力理论,构建社会支持、生计恢复力、支出型贫困程度三者关系的概念模型,提出研究假设;利用陕西省724户支出型贫困家庭的问卷调查数据,通过定序Logistic回归方法对社会支持与支出型贫困程度之间的关系进行实证分析。研究发现,在社会支持对支出型贫困程度的直接影响中,非正式社会支持能够减轻支出型贫困程度,正式社会支持对于减轻支出型贫困程度尚未发挥有效作用;在社会支持对支出型贫困程度的间接影响中,通过引入生计恢复力这一中介变量发现,非正式社会支持能够通过增加家庭收入,对减轻支出型贫困程度发挥间接正向作用。
This paper builds the conceptual framework of the relationship between social support,livelihood resilience and expenditure-based poverty,and uses ordinal logistic regression to test the proposed hypotheses based on the questionnaire data from 724 expenditure-based poor households. The results show that informal social support can reduce expenditure-based poverty,but formal social support cannot yet make a powerful contribution to expenditure-based poverty alleviation. Further analysis indicates that informal social support can alleviate expenditure-based poverty through increasing family income by introducing the mediating variable of livelihood resilience.
This paper builds the conceptual framework of the relationship between social support,livelihood resilience and expenditure-based poverty,and uses ordinal logistic regression to test the proposed hypotheses based on the questionnaire data from 724 expenditure-based poor households. The results show that informal social support can reduce expenditure-based poverty,but formal social support cannot yet make a powerful contribution to expenditure-based poverty alleviation. Further analysis indicates that informal social support can alleviate expenditure-based poverty through increasing family income by introducing the mediating variable of livelihood resilience.
引文
1.Larocco JM,House JS,French JRP.Social Support,Occupational Stress,and Health.Journal of Health and Social Behaviour,1980,21(3):202~218
2.Speranza CI,Wiesmann U,Rist S.An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social-ecological dynamics.Global Environmental Change,2014,28(1):109~119
3.Thomas Tanner.Livelihood resilience in the face of climate change.Nature climate change,2014(12):23~26
4.陈成文,潘泽泉.论社会支持的社会学意义.湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2000(6):25~31
5.陈佳,杨新军,尹莎.农户贫困恢复力测度、影响效应及对策研究.中国人口资源与环境,2016(1):150~157
6.段培新.支出型贫困救助——一种新型社会救助模式的探索.社会保障研究,2013(1):168~177
7.姜向群,郑研辉.城市老年人的养老需求及其社会支持研究——基于辽宁省营口市的抽样调查.社会科学战线,2014(5):186~192
8.励汀郁,刘博,谭淑豪.生计恢复力研究综述及其分析框架.中国物价,2018(2):35-37
9.李雪,刘洋,叶伟铭.基于多层次模糊系统的贫困等级认定模型.管理论坛,2008(9):99~101
10.梁德阔,徐大慰.上海支出型贫困家庭的救助模式分析.人口与发展,2012(4):56~61
11.刘沛栋.基本消费支出视角下的“支出型贫困”研究——以江苏省为例.社会保障研究,2014(6):89~95
12.柳清瑞,翁钱威.城镇低保线:实际给付与理论标准的差距与对策.人口与经济,2011(4):77~84
13.路锦非,曹艳春.支出型贫困家庭致贫因素的微观视角分析和救助机制研究.财贸研究,2011(2):86~91
14.尚选彩,王玉莉.我国支出型贫困救助路径选择分析.求知导刊,2016(2):68~69
15.苏飞,应蓉蓉,张慧敏.可持续性科学研究热点及其知识基础——以Sustainability Science载文数据为例.生态学报,2016(9):2764~2772
16.谢宇,谢建社.发展型社会政策视角下的支出型贫困问题研究.学习与探索,2017(3):40~47
17.王超群.因病支出型贫困社会救助政策的减贫效果模拟-基于CFPS数据的分析.公共行政评论,2017(3):99~115
18.郑瑞强.“支出型贫困”家庭社会救助模式设计与发展保障.农业经济,2016(2):95~96
2.Speranza CI,Wiesmann U,Rist S.An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social-ecological dynamics.Global Environmental Change,2014,28(1):109~119
3.Thomas Tanner.Livelihood resilience in the face of climate change.Nature climate change,2014(12):23~26
4.陈成文,潘泽泉.论社会支持的社会学意义.湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2000(6):25~31
5.陈佳,杨新军,尹莎.农户贫困恢复力测度、影响效应及对策研究.中国人口资源与环境,2016(1):150~157
6.段培新.支出型贫困救助——一种新型社会救助模式的探索.社会保障研究,2013(1):168~177
7.姜向群,郑研辉.城市老年人的养老需求及其社会支持研究——基于辽宁省营口市的抽样调查.社会科学战线,2014(5):186~192
8.励汀郁,刘博,谭淑豪.生计恢复力研究综述及其分析框架.中国物价,2018(2):35-37
9.李雪,刘洋,叶伟铭.基于多层次模糊系统的贫困等级认定模型.管理论坛,2008(9):99~101
10.梁德阔,徐大慰.上海支出型贫困家庭的救助模式分析.人口与发展,2012(4):56~61
11.刘沛栋.基本消费支出视角下的“支出型贫困”研究——以江苏省为例.社会保障研究,2014(6):89~95
12.柳清瑞,翁钱威.城镇低保线:实际给付与理论标准的差距与对策.人口与经济,2011(4):77~84
13.路锦非,曹艳春.支出型贫困家庭致贫因素的微观视角分析和救助机制研究.财贸研究,2011(2):86~91
14.尚选彩,王玉莉.我国支出型贫困救助路径选择分析.求知导刊,2016(2):68~69
15.苏飞,应蓉蓉,张慧敏.可持续性科学研究热点及其知识基础——以Sustainability Science载文数据为例.生态学报,2016(9):2764~2772
16.谢宇,谢建社.发展型社会政策视角下的支出型贫困问题研究.学习与探索,2017(3):40~47
17.王超群.因病支出型贫困社会救助政策的减贫效果模拟-基于CFPS数据的分析.公共行政评论,2017(3):99~115
18.郑瑞强.“支出型贫困”家庭社会救助模式设计与发展保障.农业经济,2016(2):95~96