摘要
目的探讨干式培养箱的工作性能及其在人类胚胎培养中应用效果。方法回顾性分析367例体外胚胎培养资料,比较干式和湿式培养箱日常工作数据和体外培养治疗结果。结果干式培养箱的温度稳定时间(3.02±0.86)分钟较湿式培养箱(4.95±1.43)分钟短(P<0.01),气体稳定时间(10.4±1.1)分钟相对于湿式培养箱(12.0±1.4)分钟明显缩短(P<0.01)。同时,干式培养箱优胚率显著高于湿式培养箱(P<0.01)。结论干式培养箱性能比湿式培养箱更稳定,优胚率更高,有利于获得更好的妊娠结局。
引文
[1]Fujiwara M1,Takahashi K,Izuno M,et al.Effect of microenvironment maintenance on embryo culture after in-vitro fertilization:comparison of top-load mini incubator and conventional front-load incubator.J Assist Reprod Genet,2007,24(1):5
[2]Rijnders PM,Jansen CA.The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation,pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Hum Reprod,1998,13(10):2869
[3]Swain JE.Decisions for the IVF laboratory:comparative analysis of embryo culture incubators.Reprod Biomed Online,2014,28(5):535
[4]Hentemann M,Mousavi K,Bertheussen K.Ifferential p H in embryo culture.Fertil Steril,2011,95(4):1291
[5]Sun XF,Wang WH,Keefe DL.Overheating is detrimental to meiotic spindles within in-vitro matured human oocytes.Zygote,2004,12(1):65.
[6]Leese HJL,Baumann CG,Brison DR,et al.Metabolism of the viable mammalian embryo:quietness revisited.Mol Hum Reprod,2008,14(12):667.
[7]Lane ML,Mitchell M,Cashman KS.To QC or not to QC:the key to a consistent laboratory?Reprod Fertil Dev,2008,20(1):23
[8]Kastrop PML,de Graaf-Miltenburg LA,Gutknecht DR,et al.Microbial contamination of embryo cultures in an ART laboratory:sources and management.Hum Reprod,2007,22(8):2243
[9]Niinimaki M,Veleva Z,Martikainen H.Embryo quality is the main factor affecting cumulative live birth rate after elective single embryo transfer in fresh stimulation cycles.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2015,194:131