体制因素、体育政策与个体体育参与的国际视野——《经济自由度、体育政策与个体体育参与:基于国际比较视域》述评
|
摘要
经济自由度、体育政策与个体体育参与:基于国际比较视域》是简·E·鲁塞斯基和卡特琳娜·玛丽苏娃2014年发表于《当代经济政策》(Contemporary Economic Policy)的一篇论文。该文基于全球样本数据,从宏观与微观两个层面对个体体育参与的影响因素进行分层分析,是对20世纪后半期以来各国兴起的体育参与干预政策与策略的理论回应,其研究范式与方法对中国的相关研究具有一定的启发意义。该研究不仅证实了政府政策对民众体育参与行为的影响,还发现了经济自由度、女性社会地位等国家一般性体制环境对个体体育参与的促进作用,对中国全民健身计划的制订与落实具有一定的参考价值。另一方面,由于中西方文化背景的区别及研究样本、引入变量的一些缺陷,该研究对中国的参考价值受到一定限制。
Economic Freedom,Sport policy,and Individual Participation in Physical Activity:An International Comparisonis a research paper published in Contemporary Economic Policy by Jane E.Ruseski and Katerina Maresova in 2014.This research is a stratified analysis of individual participation in sports and physical activity from the perspective of macro and micro that based on data of global sample.It is a theoretical response to the boom in policies and strategies of sports participation throughout the world ever since the second half of the 20 th century,and its research paradigm and methods have some enlightening significance to China's relevant research.At the same time,the research not only confirms the impact of government policies on the sports participation behavior of the public,but also finds that the national general institutional environment such as economic freedom,women's social status can promote individual sports participation,which has a certain reference value for the formulation and implementation of China's national fitness program.On the other hand,due to the differences between Chinese and Western cultural backgrounds and the shortcomings of research samples and variables adopted,the reference value of this research is limited to a certain extent.
Economic Freedom,Sport policy,and Individual Participation in Physical Activity:An International Comparisonis a research paper published in Contemporary Economic Policy by Jane E.Ruseski and Katerina Maresova in 2014.This research is a stratified analysis of individual participation in sports and physical activity from the perspective of macro and micro that based on data of global sample.It is a theoretical response to the boom in policies and strategies of sports participation throughout the world ever since the second half of the 20 th century,and its research paradigm and methods have some enlightening significance to China's relevant research.At the same time,the research not only confirms the impact of government policies on the sports participation behavior of the public,but also finds that the national general institutional environment such as economic freedom,women's social status can promote individual sports participation,which has a certain reference value for the formulation and implementation of China's national fitness program.On the other hand,due to the differences between Chinese and Western cultural backgrounds and the shortcomings of research samples and variables adopted,the reference value of this research is limited to a certain extent.
引文
[1]程华,戴健,赵蕊.发达国家大众体育政策评估的特点及启示——以美国、法国和日本为例[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2016(6):37.
[2]翁捷,肖焕禹,陈玉忠.俄罗斯体育复兴计划及其对我国的启示[J].山东体育学院学报,2015(6):18.
[3]齐国强,郑立新,张永军.域外大众体育发展状况及思考[J].中国体育科技,2000(6):46.
[4]Farrell L,Shields M A.Investigating the Economic and Demographic Determinants of Sporting Participation in England[J].Journal of the Royal Statistical Society(Series A),2002,165(2):335.
[5]Shibata A,Oka K,Nakamura Y,et al.Prevalence and Demographic Correlates of Meeting the Physical Activity Recommendation Among Japanese Adults[J].Journal of Physical Activity&Health,2009,6(1):24.
[6]Hallmann K,Breuer C.The Influence of Socio-Demographic Indicators Economic Determinants and Social Recognition on Sport Participation in Germany[J].European Journal of Sport Science,2014(14):324.
[7]Rütten,A,Abu-Omar K.Prevalence of Physical Activity in the European Union[J].Sozial-und Pr·ventivmedizin:Social and Preventive Medicine,2004,49(4):281.
[8]Van Tuyckom C.Macro-Environmental Factors Associated with Leisure-Time Physical Activity:ACross-National Analysis of EU Countries[J].Scandinavian Journal of Public Health,2011(39):419.
[9]Ruseski J E,Maresova K.Economic freedom,sport policy,and Individual Participation in Physical activity:An international Comparison[J].Contemporary Economic Policy,2014,32(1):42.
[10]国务院.关于加快发展体育产业促进体育消费的若干意见[Z].国发[2014]46号,2014-10-20.
[11]新华社.全国体育局长会议闭幕全民健身被列为2016“七大任务”之首[EB/OL].(2015-12-29)[2018-03-26].http://www1.www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-12/29/content_5029277.htm.
[12]仇军,高峰,马启伟.我国体育人口活动项目的参与及其变动趋势——以社会体育人口为中心[J].体育科学,2000(7):12.
[13]李卫平,归明,任保国.山东省群众体育现状及发展对策研究[J].体育科学,2001(1):14.
[14]江亮.论我国社会体育发展的条件[D].芜湖:安徽师范大学,2005:5-15.
[15]唐永泉.河南省新型城镇群众体育发展的因素及策略分析[J].河南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2013(6):165.
(1)国际社会调查项目(International Social Survey Programme,ISSP):是一个自发的非政府非盈利跨国合作学术组织,成立于1984年,旨在推动社会科学研究的标准化和国际化,协调跨国跨地区的联合项目,建立共享的社科数据库。目前会员国已包括48个国家和地区,中国在2007年成为该组织会员国。
(2)经济自由度(economic freedom):反映为一个经济体内市场配置资源的自由度。在经济自由度指数出现以后,不少学者或机构对其进行了不同的度量,目前影响较大的为美国传统基金会(Heritage Foundation)和加拿大菲莎研究所(Fraser Institute)发布的经济自由度指数或报告。
(3)体育政策:原文为“Sport Policy”,倾向于竞技体育政策,这里基于中西不同的文化语境,暂且将“Sport Policy”模糊翻译为“体育政策”。
[2]翁捷,肖焕禹,陈玉忠.俄罗斯体育复兴计划及其对我国的启示[J].山东体育学院学报,2015(6):18.
[3]齐国强,郑立新,张永军.域外大众体育发展状况及思考[J].中国体育科技,2000(6):46.
[4]Farrell L,Shields M A.Investigating the Economic and Demographic Determinants of Sporting Participation in England[J].Journal of the Royal Statistical Society(Series A),2002,165(2):335.
[5]Shibata A,Oka K,Nakamura Y,et al.Prevalence and Demographic Correlates of Meeting the Physical Activity Recommendation Among Japanese Adults[J].Journal of Physical Activity&Health,2009,6(1):24.
[6]Hallmann K,Breuer C.The Influence of Socio-Demographic Indicators Economic Determinants and Social Recognition on Sport Participation in Germany[J].European Journal of Sport Science,2014(14):324.
[7]Rütten,A,Abu-Omar K.Prevalence of Physical Activity in the European Union[J].Sozial-und Pr·ventivmedizin:Social and Preventive Medicine,2004,49(4):281.
[8]Van Tuyckom C.Macro-Environmental Factors Associated with Leisure-Time Physical Activity:ACross-National Analysis of EU Countries[J].Scandinavian Journal of Public Health,2011(39):419.
[9]Ruseski J E,Maresova K.Economic freedom,sport policy,and Individual Participation in Physical activity:An international Comparison[J].Contemporary Economic Policy,2014,32(1):42.
[10]国务院.关于加快发展体育产业促进体育消费的若干意见[Z].国发[2014]46号,2014-10-20.
[11]新华社.全国体育局长会议闭幕全民健身被列为2016“七大任务”之首[EB/OL].(2015-12-29)[2018-03-26].http://www1.www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-12/29/content_5029277.htm.
[12]仇军,高峰,马启伟.我国体育人口活动项目的参与及其变动趋势——以社会体育人口为中心[J].体育科学,2000(7):12.
[13]李卫平,归明,任保国.山东省群众体育现状及发展对策研究[J].体育科学,2001(1):14.
[14]江亮.论我国社会体育发展的条件[D].芜湖:安徽师范大学,2005:5-15.
[15]唐永泉.河南省新型城镇群众体育发展的因素及策略分析[J].河南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2013(6):165.
(1)国际社会调查项目(International Social Survey Programme,ISSP):是一个自发的非政府非盈利跨国合作学术组织,成立于1984年,旨在推动社会科学研究的标准化和国际化,协调跨国跨地区的联合项目,建立共享的社科数据库。目前会员国已包括48个国家和地区,中国在2007年成为该组织会员国。
(2)经济自由度(economic freedom):反映为一个经济体内市场配置资源的自由度。在经济自由度指数出现以后,不少学者或机构对其进行了不同的度量,目前影响较大的为美国传统基金会(Heritage Foundation)和加拿大菲莎研究所(Fraser Institute)发布的经济自由度指数或报告。
(3)体育政策:原文为“Sport Policy”,倾向于竞技体育政策,这里基于中西不同的文化语境,暂且将“Sport Policy”模糊翻译为“体育政策”。