体育健身团队负责人胜任力评价量表编制及信效度检验
|
摘要
采用行为事件访谈法(BEI),对34位体育健身团队负责人进行访谈,构建体育健身团队负责人胜任力模型,包括管理能力、领导能力、服务能力、沟通能力、责任意识、个人特质6个特征群和15个胜任特征。以模型为基础编制了体育健身团队负责人胜任力评价量表,通过766个样本进行验证,研究表明编制的量表包含6个维度、49个项目较为合理。跨样本检验证实,量表区分度良好,每个项目与其所属分量表总分之间的相关值较高,与其他分量表总分的相关值较低;信度较高,内部一致性信度系数、折半信度、重测信度分别为0.950、0.919、0.896;效度良好,内容效度合理、结构效度理想、实证效果良好。所编制量表是一份理想、有效、可推广的量表,可以当作体育健身团队负责人胜任力水平评测工具,为健身团队负责人选拔、培训提供科学依据。
Behavior Event Interview(BEI) was used to the heads of 34 physical fitness teams to build a model of the competency of the person in charge of the physical fitness team. The model includes six feature groups and 15 competency features including management, leadership, service, communication, responsibility, and personal traits. Compile the competency evaluation scale of the person in charge of the physical fitness team based on the model. The study showed that the compiled scale consisted of six dimensions and 49 projects. It is confirmed by the cross-sample test that the discrimination of the scale is good, the correlation value between each item and the total score of its sub-scale was higher, and the correlation value with the total score of other sub-scales was lower. The reliability high, the Internal consistency reliability coefficient, split-half reliability and retest reliability were 0.950、0.919、0.896. The validity of the scale is good, the content validity is reasonable, the structural validity is ideal, and the empirical effect is good. Therefore, this is an ideal, effective and popularable scale, which can be used as a tool for the evaluation of the competency of the heads of the physical fitness team and can provide a scientific basis for the selection and training of the heads of the fitness team.
Behavior Event Interview(BEI) was used to the heads of 34 physical fitness teams to build a model of the competency of the person in charge of the physical fitness team. The model includes six feature groups and 15 competency features including management, leadership, service, communication, responsibility, and personal traits. Compile the competency evaluation scale of the person in charge of the physical fitness team based on the model. The study showed that the compiled scale consisted of six dimensions and 49 projects. It is confirmed by the cross-sample test that the discrimination of the scale is good, the correlation value between each item and the total score of its sub-scale was higher, and the correlation value with the total score of other sub-scales was lower. The reliability high, the Internal consistency reliability coefficient, split-half reliability and retest reliability were 0.950、0.919、0.896. The validity of the scale is good, the content validity is reasonable, the structural validity is ideal, and the empirical effect is good. Therefore, this is an ideal, effective and popularable scale, which can be used as a tool for the evaluation of the competency of the heads of the physical fitness team and can provide a scientific basis for the selection and training of the heads of the fitness team.
引文
[1] 解读《关于健身组织备案工作的指导意见》[EB/OL].[2018-08-02].http://www.bjsports.gov.cn/bjsports/zcfg15/zcjd/1476389/ind ex.html.
[2] 韦伯.支配社会学[M].康乐,简惠美,译.桂林:广西师大出版社,2004:353.
[3] SPENCER L M,SPENCER S M.Competence at work:models for superior performance[M].New York:John Wiley & Sons inc,1993.
[4] GREENFIELD P M.You can′t take it with you:why ability assessment don′t cross cultures[J].American Psychologist,1997(52):1115-1124.
[5] PARRY S R.The quest for competencies[J].Traing,1996:48-56.
[6] 风笑天.现代社会调查方法[M].5版.武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2015:47-79.
[7] 冯晓丽,李秀云.新媒体时代草根体育组织发展的困境与路径选择:以“黎明脚步组织”为例[J].上海体育学院学报,2015,39(2):36-39.
[8] 王玮娴.北京市海淀区体育健身团队研究[D].北京:首都体育学院,2015.
[9] 贾寰烨.西安市莲湖区群众性健身团队的研究[D].西安:西安体育学院,2016.
[10] MCCLELLAND D C.Testing for competence rather than for intelligence[J].American Psychologist,1973(28):1-14.
[11] 邱芬.我国专业教练员胜任特征的模型建构及测评研究[D].北京:北京体育大学,2008.
[12] 徐建平.教师胜任力模型及评测研究[D].北京:北京师范大学,2004.
[13] 童成寿.熟手型教师胜任力模型建构与测评研究[D].福州:福建师范大学,2008.
[14] 李明斐.公务员胜任力模型构建与检验研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2006.
[15] 毛志雄.我国部分项目的运动员对兴奋剂的态度和意向:TRA与TPB两个理论模型的检验[D].北京:北京体育大学,2001.
[16] 杨承根,杨琴.SPSS项目分析在问卷设计中的应用[J].高等继续教育学报,2010,23(3):109-111.
[17] 李健,兰亚佳,王治明,等.职业紧张量表(OSI-R)信度与效度验证[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2001,19(3):190-193.
[18] 游泓.情感与信任关系的社会学研究:一个信任关系结构方程模型的建构和验证[D].武汉:武汉大学,2009.
[19] 张雅明,王永丽,曾盼盼,等.《小学生心理健康量表》的验证性因素分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(4):278-280.
[20] ABDULLAH F.Measuring service quality in higher education:three instruments compared[J].International Journal of Research & Method in Education,2006,29(1):71-89.
[2] 韦伯.支配社会学[M].康乐,简惠美,译.桂林:广西师大出版社,2004:353.
[3] SPENCER L M,SPENCER S M.Competence at work:models for superior performance[M].New York:John Wiley & Sons inc,1993.
[4] GREENFIELD P M.You can′t take it with you:why ability assessment don′t cross cultures[J].American Psychologist,1997(52):1115-1124.
[5] PARRY S R.The quest for competencies[J].Traing,1996:48-56.
[6] 风笑天.现代社会调查方法[M].5版.武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2015:47-79.
[7] 冯晓丽,李秀云.新媒体时代草根体育组织发展的困境与路径选择:以“黎明脚步组织”为例[J].上海体育学院学报,2015,39(2):36-39.
[8] 王玮娴.北京市海淀区体育健身团队研究[D].北京:首都体育学院,2015.
[9] 贾寰烨.西安市莲湖区群众性健身团队的研究[D].西安:西安体育学院,2016.
[10] MCCLELLAND D C.Testing for competence rather than for intelligence[J].American Psychologist,1973(28):1-14.
[11] 邱芬.我国专业教练员胜任特征的模型建构及测评研究[D].北京:北京体育大学,2008.
[12] 徐建平.教师胜任力模型及评测研究[D].北京:北京师范大学,2004.
[13] 童成寿.熟手型教师胜任力模型建构与测评研究[D].福州:福建师范大学,2008.
[14] 李明斐.公务员胜任力模型构建与检验研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2006.
[15] 毛志雄.我国部分项目的运动员对兴奋剂的态度和意向:TRA与TPB两个理论模型的检验[D].北京:北京体育大学,2001.
[16] 杨承根,杨琴.SPSS项目分析在问卷设计中的应用[J].高等继续教育学报,2010,23(3):109-111.
[17] 李健,兰亚佳,王治明,等.职业紧张量表(OSI-R)信度与效度验证[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2001,19(3):190-193.
[18] 游泓.情感与信任关系的社会学研究:一个信任关系结构方程模型的建构和验证[D].武汉:武汉大学,2009.
[19] 张雅明,王永丽,曾盼盼,等.《小学生心理健康量表》的验证性因素分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(4):278-280.
[20] ABDULLAH F.Measuring service quality in higher education:three instruments compared[J].International Journal of Research & Method in Education,2006,29(1):71-89.