摘要
目的探讨血清肿瘤标志物(CA199、CA724、CA242、CEA)用于临床诊断胃癌的价值。方法选取确诊为胃癌的160例患者进行研究,并纳入至观察A组。同时选择同期治疗的160例慢性萎缩性胃炎患者作为观察B组;并选择同期进行体检的正常健康人员160例作为对照组。分别抽取3组空腹下血清,并检测其CA199、CA724、CA242、CEA水平。结果观察A组患者血清CA199、CA724、CA242、CEA水平明显高于观察B组、对照组,差异具有统计学意义,P<0. 05;但观察B组与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。联合检测CA199、CA724、CA242、CEA的敏感度、准确度明显高于单项或两项或三项检测,差异具有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论联合检测血清CA199、CA724、CA242、CEA水平可提高对胃癌诊断的准确性。
Objective To explore the value of detecting serum tumor markers( CA199,CA724,CA242,CEA) for clinical diagnosis of gastric cancer. Methods Selected from our hospital and diagnosed with gastric cancer in 160 patients were studied and included in the observation group. At the same time select the same period in our hospital for treatment of 160 patients with chronic atrophic gastritis as the observation group B; and select the same period in our hospital for physical examination of160 healthy subjects as the control group. Three fasting serum samples were collected and their CA199,CA724,CA242 and CEA levels were measured. Results The level of serum CA199,CA724,CA242 and CEA in group A was significantly higher than that in group B and control group,the difference was statistically significant( P < 0. 05). However,the observation group B compared with the control group,the difference was not significant,no statistical significance P > 0. 05. The sensitivity and accuracy of combined detection of CA199,CA724,CA242 and CEA were significantly higher than those of single detection of CA199,CA724,CA242,CEA or two or three,with significant difference( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Combined detection of serum CA199,CA724,CA242,CEA levels can improve the diagnostic accuracy of gastric cancer.
引文
[1]程鹏.胃癌诊断中肿瘤标志物CEA、CA19-9、CA125的水平变化及临床意义[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(20):5679-5681.
[2]高凤云,陶永明,郑嫦娟,等.肿瘤标志物联合检测在胃癌诊断及预后评估中的价值[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2014,26(3):183-186.
[3]赵连爽,云科,董西华,等.胃癌患者血清中CA72-4、CEA和CA19-9水平及其与病理特征的相关性[J].中国医科大学学报,2014,43(3):259-262,274.
[4]谭海燕,马书进.胃癌患者术前血清肿瘤标志物监测[J].中华实验外科杂志,2017,34(10):1766-1767.
[5]周伟,魏平,王兴远,等.血清肿瘤标志物水平改变对胃癌患者化疗效果的评价价值[J].实用癌症杂志,2015,30(7):979-981.
[6]焦艳.肿瘤标志物对胃癌诊断及预后的评估价值[J].实用癌症杂志,2013,28(6):614-616.
[7]徐汪松,王丹.肿瘤标志物单项及联合检测对胃癌的诊断价值[J].安徽医药,2013,17(3):470-471.
[8]于嘉伟,袁洪新,马利林,等.CHPPC联合静脉化疗对老年胃癌患者肿瘤标志物含量及免疫功能的影响[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2017,36(3):439-443.
[9]孙立秋,崔海,崔演,等.血清CEA、CA125及CA72-4在胃癌腹膜转移中的临床意义[J].中国癌症杂志,2017,27(3):191-196.
[10]谢海涛.肿瘤标志物CA724、CA199、CA242、CEA联合检测在老年胃癌诊断中的应用[J].中国老年学杂志,2017,37(1):127-129.