农户宅基地有偿退出与有偿使用决策行为影响因素研究——基于传统农区宜城市的实证
|
摘要
研究目的:从宅基地"双有偿"系统分析视角,探索影响传统农区农户宅基地"双有偿"行为决策的因素,为深化宅基地制度改革提供参考。研究方法:基于IAD延伸决策模型,围绕户主特征及家庭概况、政策实施环境、宅基地"双有偿"规则、认知改革4方面变量,采用二元Logistic整体回归分析。研究结果:农户宅基地"双有偿"受这4方面变量共同影响。其中在户主及家庭概况方面,住宅数量对宅基地退出起到了决定性的作用,反映出宅基地对农户的住房保障功能;在政策实施环境变量中,与集镇距离变量对宅基地退出呈现"正态分布"、基础设施发达程度与宅基地有偿退出正相关;在宅基地"双有偿"决策中,退出补偿标准对宅基地有偿退出在0.01水平上显著,呈现负相关关系;认知改革变量(宅基地所有权归属、退出对实际生活水平影响、有偿退出政策满意度)对宅基地有偿退出正向影响较为显著。研究结论:在宅基地"双有偿"改革过程中要加大对政策的宣传,在推进宅基地退出时要注意时序分区,加强对退出后宅基地利用和宅基地有偿使用费的管理。
The purpose of this study is to explore the impact factors of the rural residential land "Double Paid" behavior decision of rural households in the traditional agricultural areas from the perspective of the "Double Paid" systematic analysis, and to provide policy references to promote the institutional reform on rural residential land. The method is to conduct the binary logistic regression analysis based on the IAD extension decision model, from the perspectives of the characteristics of the rural household, the environment of the policy implementation, the rules of "Double Paid", and the rural household cognitive of reform. The results show that: the "Double Paid" of rural residential land is affected by four variables. In terms of the characteristics of rural household, the number of residences played a decisive role, reflecting that the major concern of rural households to exit the rural residential land is the housing security. Among the environmental variables of policy implementation, the variable of distance from the town showed "normal distribution" for rural residential land exiting, and the infrastructure development are positively correlated with the rural residential land paid-exit. In the rule of "Double Paid", the extant compensation standard has a significant negative correlation with the rural residential land exiting at the 0.01 level. The rural household cognitive of reform(rural residential land ownership, the impact on the living standards after exiting, the satisfaction about rural residential land paid-exit policies) are also significant for the positive impact of rural residential land paid-exit. In conclusion, it is necessary to increase the publicity of policies, to pay attention to time sequence in rural residential land paid-exit, and to strengthen the management of rural residential land after paid-exit and the fees of the paid-use.
The purpose of this study is to explore the impact factors of the rural residential land "Double Paid" behavior decision of rural households in the traditional agricultural areas from the perspective of the "Double Paid" systematic analysis, and to provide policy references to promote the institutional reform on rural residential land. The method is to conduct the binary logistic regression analysis based on the IAD extension decision model, from the perspectives of the characteristics of the rural household, the environment of the policy implementation, the rules of "Double Paid", and the rural household cognitive of reform. The results show that: the "Double Paid" of rural residential land is affected by four variables. In terms of the characteristics of rural household, the number of residences played a decisive role, reflecting that the major concern of rural households to exit the rural residential land is the housing security. Among the environmental variables of policy implementation, the variable of distance from the town showed "normal distribution" for rural residential land exiting, and the infrastructure development are positively correlated with the rural residential land paid-exit. In the rule of "Double Paid", the extant compensation standard has a significant negative correlation with the rural residential land exiting at the 0.01 level. The rural household cognitive of reform(rural residential land ownership, the impact on the living standards after exiting, the satisfaction about rural residential land paid-exit policies) are also significant for the positive impact of rural residential land paid-exit. In conclusion, it is necessary to increase the publicity of policies, to pay attention to time sequence in rural residential land paid-exit, and to strengthen the management of rural residential land after paid-exit and the fees of the paid-use.
引文
[1]庄开明,黄敏.完善农村宅基地退出与补偿机制的思考[J].农村经济,2017(7):13-19.
[2]张衍毓,刘彦随,王业侨.统筹城乡视角下村庄整治建设的模式与途径——以三亚市为例[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(6):977-983.
[3]张勇,汪应宏.农村宅基地退出补偿研究综述[J].中国农业大学学报,2016,21(3):151-160.
[4]王丹秋,廖成泉,胡银根,等.微观福利视角下农户宅基地置换意愿及其驱动因素研究——基于湖北省4个典型村的实证分析[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(11):40-47.
[5]胡银根,张曼,魏西云,等.农村宅基地退出的补偿测算——以商丘市农村地区为例[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(3):29-35.
[6]张秀智,丁锐.经济欠发达与偏远农村地区宅基地退出机制分析:案例研究[J].中国农村观察,2009(6):23-30,94-95.
[7]王丹秋.农户宅基地有偿使用的有效阈值研究——基于宜城市改革试点区的实证[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2017.
[8]彭长生.农民宅基地产权认知状况对其宅基地退出意愿的影响——基于安徽省6个县1413户农户问卷调查的实证分析[J].中国农村观察,2013(1):21-33.
[9]张怡然,邱道持,李艳,等.农民工进城落户与宅基地退出影响因素分析——基于重庆市开县357份农民工的调查问卷[J].中国软科学,2011(2):62-68.
[10]朱新华.户籍制度对农户宅基地退出意愿的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(10):129-134.
[11]杨丽霞,朱从谋,苑韶峰,等.基于供给侧改革的农户宅基地退出意愿及福利变化分析——以浙江省义乌市为例[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(1):35-41
[12]许恒周,殷红春,石淑芹.代际差异视角下农民工乡城迁移与宅基地退出影响因素分析——基于推拉理论的实证研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(8):75-80.
[13]于伟.城镇化进程中农户宅基地退出的决策行为及影响因素[J].地理研究,2016,35(3):551-560.
[14]朱新华.感知价值、可行能力对农户宅基地退出意愿的影响及其代际差异[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(9):64-72.
[15]OSTROM E. Understanding Institutional Diversity[M].Princeton, NJ, USA:Princeton University Press, 2005.
[16]何凌霄,张忠根,南永清,等.制度规则与干群关系:破解农村基础设施管护行动的困境——基于IAD框架的农户管护意愿研究[J].农业经济问题,2017,38(1):9-21,110.
[17]李文钊.制度分析与发展框架:传统、演进与展望[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2016(6):4-18.
[18]刘珉.集体林权制度改革:农户种植意愿研究——基于Elinor Ostrom的IAD延伸模型[J].管理世界,2011(5):93-98.
[19]曹裕,吴次芳,朱一中.基于IAD延伸决策模型的农户征地意愿研究[J].经济地理,2015,35(1):141-148.
[20]沈孝强,吴次芳.自主参与式农地休养政策:模式和启示[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(1):68-74.
[21]俞振宁.基于IAD延伸决策模型的农户耕地休养意愿研究[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(2):198-209.
[22]杨玉珍.农户闲置宅基地退出的影响因素及政策衔接——行为经济学视角[J].经济地理,2015,35(7):140-147.
[23]佟艳.农户闲置宅基地退出意愿及影响因素研究——以河南省为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(10):26-30.
[2]张衍毓,刘彦随,王业侨.统筹城乡视角下村庄整治建设的模式与途径——以三亚市为例[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(6):977-983.
[3]张勇,汪应宏.农村宅基地退出补偿研究综述[J].中国农业大学学报,2016,21(3):151-160.
[4]王丹秋,廖成泉,胡银根,等.微观福利视角下农户宅基地置换意愿及其驱动因素研究——基于湖北省4个典型村的实证分析[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(11):40-47.
[5]胡银根,张曼,魏西云,等.农村宅基地退出的补偿测算——以商丘市农村地区为例[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(3):29-35.
[6]张秀智,丁锐.经济欠发达与偏远农村地区宅基地退出机制分析:案例研究[J].中国农村观察,2009(6):23-30,94-95.
[7]王丹秋.农户宅基地有偿使用的有效阈值研究——基于宜城市改革试点区的实证[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2017.
[8]彭长生.农民宅基地产权认知状况对其宅基地退出意愿的影响——基于安徽省6个县1413户农户问卷调查的实证分析[J].中国农村观察,2013(1):21-33.
[9]张怡然,邱道持,李艳,等.农民工进城落户与宅基地退出影响因素分析——基于重庆市开县357份农民工的调查问卷[J].中国软科学,2011(2):62-68.
[10]朱新华.户籍制度对农户宅基地退出意愿的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(10):129-134.
[11]杨丽霞,朱从谋,苑韶峰,等.基于供给侧改革的农户宅基地退出意愿及福利变化分析——以浙江省义乌市为例[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(1):35-41
[12]许恒周,殷红春,石淑芹.代际差异视角下农民工乡城迁移与宅基地退出影响因素分析——基于推拉理论的实证研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(8):75-80.
[13]于伟.城镇化进程中农户宅基地退出的决策行为及影响因素[J].地理研究,2016,35(3):551-560.
[14]朱新华.感知价值、可行能力对农户宅基地退出意愿的影响及其代际差异[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(9):64-72.
[15]OSTROM E. Understanding Institutional Diversity[M].Princeton, NJ, USA:Princeton University Press, 2005.
[16]何凌霄,张忠根,南永清,等.制度规则与干群关系:破解农村基础设施管护行动的困境——基于IAD框架的农户管护意愿研究[J].农业经济问题,2017,38(1):9-21,110.
[17]李文钊.制度分析与发展框架:传统、演进与展望[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2016(6):4-18.
[18]刘珉.集体林权制度改革:农户种植意愿研究——基于Elinor Ostrom的IAD延伸模型[J].管理世界,2011(5):93-98.
[19]曹裕,吴次芳,朱一中.基于IAD延伸决策模型的农户征地意愿研究[J].经济地理,2015,35(1):141-148.
[20]沈孝强,吴次芳.自主参与式农地休养政策:模式和启示[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(1):68-74.
[21]俞振宁.基于IAD延伸决策模型的农户耕地休养意愿研究[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(2):198-209.
[22]杨玉珍.农户闲置宅基地退出的影响因素及政策衔接——行为经济学视角[J].经济地理,2015,35(7):140-147.
[23]佟艳.农户闲置宅基地退出意愿及影响因素研究——以河南省为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(10):26-30.