汉晋十六国时期“窦融故事”历史记忆的生成与流转
|
摘要
窦融作为两汉之际的历史人物,因其保宁河西、忠于汉室、拥护统一的政治选择而被世人称颂。经范晔《后汉书》的最终书写,"窦融故事"作为一个重要的历史记忆,成为维护东汉王朝大一统和反对分裂割据的政治文化象征,在官方权力强势支持下被保存在"典范中国史"中。魏晋十六国时期战乱频仍,经常会重演与两汉之际相似的历史"情境",因此"窦融故事"被不断地重复和唤醒,不过其内涵已然发生变化。"窦融故事"历史记忆的生成,及记忆主体根据现实需要予以的选择、利用,为我们更好地理解"历史记忆"提供了案例。
Dou Rong, a historical figure in the Han Dynasty, was praised by the world for its protection of Hexi and advocacy of a unified political choice. After the final writing of Fan Ye's History of Eastern Han Dynasty,"Dou Rong's Story"became an important historical memory and became the political culture of maintaining the unification of the East Han Dynasty and opposing the separatists, and was preserved in the"classic Chinese history"under the strong support of the official power. During the period of the sixteen countries in the Wei and Jin dynasties, the war was frequent, and the historical"situation"similar to the Han Dynasty was repeated. Therefore,"Dou Rong's Story" was constantly repeated and awakened, but its connotation had changed. The creation of the historical memory of"Dou Rong's Story"and the choice and use of the memory subject according to the needs of reality provide a case for us to better understand the"historical memory".
Dou Rong, a historical figure in the Han Dynasty, was praised by the world for its protection of Hexi and advocacy of a unified political choice. After the final writing of Fan Ye's History of Eastern Han Dynasty,"Dou Rong's Story"became an important historical memory and became the political culture of maintaining the unification of the East Han Dynasty and opposing the separatists, and was preserved in the"classic Chinese history"under the strong support of the official power. During the period of the sixteen countries in the Wei and Jin dynasties, the war was frequent, and the historical"situation"similar to the Han Dynasty was repeated. Therefore,"Dou Rong's Story" was constantly repeated and awakened, but its connotation had changed. The creation of the historical memory of"Dou Rong's Story"and the choice and use of the memory subject according to the needs of reality provide a case for us to better understand the"historical memory".
引文
[1]侯宗辉.20世纪80年代以来两汉之际河西窦融研究述评[J].焦作师范高等专科学校学报,2012(2):46-50.
[2]王鸣盛.十七史商榷[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2013.
[3]范晔.后汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.
[4]张忠炜.《居延新简》所见“购偿科别”册书复原及相关问题之研究——以《额济纳汉简》“购赏科条”为切入点[J].文史哲,2007(6):54-61.
[5]陈寿.三国志[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
[6]房玄龄.晋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[7]周天游.后汉纪校注[M].天津:天津古籍出版社,1987.
(1)“典范中国史”的提法最早见于王明珂《英雄祖先与弟兄民族——根基历史的文本与情景》(中华书局2009年版,第60页),表示被保存于正史中的一种历史记忆。
[2]王鸣盛.十七史商榷[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2013.
[3]范晔.后汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.
[4]张忠炜.《居延新简》所见“购偿科别”册书复原及相关问题之研究——以《额济纳汉简》“购赏科条”为切入点[J].文史哲,2007(6):54-61.
[5]陈寿.三国志[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
[6]房玄龄.晋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[7]周天游.后汉纪校注[M].天津:天津古籍出版社,1987.
(1)“典范中国史”的提法最早见于王明珂《英雄祖先与弟兄民族——根基历史的文本与情景》(中华书局2009年版,第60页),表示被保存于正史中的一种历史记忆。