内蒙古县域全要素生产率增长及其收敛性研究——基于DEA-Malmquist指数的实证分析
|
摘要
运用DEA-Malmquist指数法对内蒙古县域全要素生产率(TFP)增长进行分析.结果显示,内蒙古县域TFP增长总体水平偏低,对经济增长的贡献率偏小且呈逐年下降趋势,县域经济属于粗放式增长;技术效率与技术进步变动呈反周期波动,是导致TFP低水平增长的主要原因;县域TFP增长表现出明显的个体差异,西部县域差距高于东部.收敛性检验表明,内蒙古县域TFP增长存在显著的条件β收敛,西部县域收敛速度慢于东部,说明内蒙古县域TFP增长将会收敛于各自的稳态水平,而绝对β收敛却是一个相当漫长的过程.
This paper applies DEA-Malmquist index method to analyze the total factor productivity growth of the county economy in Inner Mongolia.The results show that the overall level of country economy TFP growth is low;its contribution rate to economic growth is small and has a declining trend year by year.The main causes are the extensive growth of county economy in Inner Mongolia and the counter cyclical fluctuation of technical efficiency and technical progress.TFP growth level of county economy shows distinct individual differences.The county gap is higher in the West than in the East.The convergence test indicates that there exists significant conditionalβconvergence in country TFP growth in Inner Mongolia,the country convergence rate is slower in the West than in the East,which states that the Inner Mongolia country TFP growth will converge to their respective steady-state levels;however absoluteβconvergence is a fairly long process.
This paper applies DEA-Malmquist index method to analyze the total factor productivity growth of the county economy in Inner Mongolia.The results show that the overall level of country economy TFP growth is low;its contribution rate to economic growth is small and has a declining trend year by year.The main causes are the extensive growth of county economy in Inner Mongolia and the counter cyclical fluctuation of technical efficiency and technical progress.TFP growth level of county economy shows distinct individual differences.The county gap is higher in the West than in the East.The convergence test indicates that there exists significant conditionalβconvergence in country TFP growth in Inner Mongolia,the country convergence rate is slower in the West than in the East,which states that the Inner Mongolia country TFP growth will converge to their respective steady-state levels;however absoluteβconvergence is a fairly long process.
引文
[1]郑晓幸,刘晓松.论县域经济增长方式的转变[J].经济体制改革,1996(05):96-101.
[2]王永剑,刘春杰.金融发展对中国资本配置效率的影响及区域比较[J].财贸经济,2011(03):54-60.
[3]赵文军,于津平.市场化进程与我国经济增长方式——基于省际面板数据的实证研究[J].南开经济研究,2014(03):3-22.
[4]高帆.我国区域农业全要素生产率的演变趋势与影响因素——基于省际面板数据的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2015年(05):3-19.
[5]李健,卫平.金融发展与全要素生产率增长——基于中国省际面板数据的实证分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2015(08):47-64.
[6]Farrell M.J.The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,1957(3):253-290.
[7]Ray S C,Desli E.Productivity Growth,Technical Progress,and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries:Comment[J].The American Economic Review,1997,87(5):1033-1039.
[8]张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952-2000[J].经济研究,2004(10):35-44.
[9]单豪杰.中国资本存量K的再估算:1952-2006年[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008(10):17-31.
[10]岳书敬,刘朝明.人力资本与区域全要素生产率分析[J].经济研究,2006(4):90-96.
[11]吴春雅.江西县域经济的比较研究——基于全要素生产率视角[J].中国农学通报,2015(24):258-264.
[12]王兵,吴延瑞,颜鹏飞.中国区域环境效率与环境全要素生产率增长[J].经济研究,2010,45(05):95-109.
[13]张自然.中国生产性服务业技术效率分析[J].贵州财经学院学报,2012(03):31-37.
[14]Barro R Sala-i-Martin X.Convergence[J].Journal of Political Economy,1992,100(2):232-251.
[15]赵传仁,戴俊丽.中国大数据企业全要素生产率增长及收敛研究[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(02):60-66.
[16]Miller S,Upadhyay M.Total Productivity and the Convergence Hypothesis[J].Journal of Macroeconomics,2002,24(2):267-286.
(1)文献[12-13]认为,若全要素生产率贡献份额大于50%,则称为“要素生产率增进型”增长方式,即集约型经济增长方式;反之,若全要素生产率贡献份额小于50%,此时要素贡献份额大于50%,则称为“要素积累型”增长方式,即粗放型经济增长方式.
[2]王永剑,刘春杰.金融发展对中国资本配置效率的影响及区域比较[J].财贸经济,2011(03):54-60.
[3]赵文军,于津平.市场化进程与我国经济增长方式——基于省际面板数据的实证研究[J].南开经济研究,2014(03):3-22.
[4]高帆.我国区域农业全要素生产率的演变趋势与影响因素——基于省际面板数据的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2015年(05):3-19.
[5]李健,卫平.金融发展与全要素生产率增长——基于中国省际面板数据的实证分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2015(08):47-64.
[6]Farrell M.J.The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,1957(3):253-290.
[7]Ray S C,Desli E.Productivity Growth,Technical Progress,and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries:Comment[J].The American Economic Review,1997,87(5):1033-1039.
[8]张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952-2000[J].经济研究,2004(10):35-44.
[9]单豪杰.中国资本存量K的再估算:1952-2006年[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008(10):17-31.
[10]岳书敬,刘朝明.人力资本与区域全要素生产率分析[J].经济研究,2006(4):90-96.
[11]吴春雅.江西县域经济的比较研究——基于全要素生产率视角[J].中国农学通报,2015(24):258-264.
[12]王兵,吴延瑞,颜鹏飞.中国区域环境效率与环境全要素生产率增长[J].经济研究,2010,45(05):95-109.
[13]张自然.中国生产性服务业技术效率分析[J].贵州财经学院学报,2012(03):31-37.
[14]Barro R Sala-i-Martin X.Convergence[J].Journal of Political Economy,1992,100(2):232-251.
[15]赵传仁,戴俊丽.中国大数据企业全要素生产率增长及收敛研究[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(02):60-66.
[16]Miller S,Upadhyay M.Total Productivity and the Convergence Hypothesis[J].Journal of Macroeconomics,2002,24(2):267-286.
(1)文献[12-13]认为,若全要素生产率贡献份额大于50%,则称为“要素生产率增进型”增长方式,即集约型经济增长方式;反之,若全要素生产率贡献份额小于50%,此时要素贡献份额大于50%,则称为“要素积累型”增长方式,即粗放型经济增长方式.