论胡适《尝试集》自序的诗史价值
|
摘要
胡适是早期新诗的倡导者之一,其作品《尝试集》是第一部个体创作的新诗集,在中国新诗史上具有开创性的意义。《尝试集》于1920年3月由亚东图书馆出版,在两年多的时间内,经历了四个版本的流变。从初版本到四版本,胡适先后为《尝试集》撰写了三篇自序:《尝试集·自序》(初版)、《再版自序》以及《四版自序》。这三篇自序意义重大,涵盖了创作、批评、理论、史学等各个方面,是研究胡适新诗理论及其新诗创作的重要资源。它不仅体现了胡适新诗观的演变图景,而且再现了新诗发生期的批评语境,具有重要的互文性价值。另外,胡适自序的写作方式及发表方式,为《尝试集》经典地位的形成客观上起到了重要的作用。
Hu Shi is one of the initiators of new poetry in the 1920s,and his work Attempt Collection is the first new poetry collection created by individual,which is of groundbreaking significance in the history of Chinese new poetry. Attempt Collection was published by Yadong Library in March 1920,and had gone through four editions in two years. From the first edition to the fourth edition, Hu Shi had written three prefaces: the first edition, the second edition and the fourth edition. These three prefaces are of great significance, covering creation, criticism, theory, history and other aspects, and are important resources for studying Hu Shi's creation and theory of new poetry. This serie of prefaces not only reflected the evolving landscape of Hu Shi's view of new poetry,but also represented the critical context of the new poetry's emergence period, which has important value of intertextuality. In addition, the way of writing and publishing of these prefaces had played an important role in the formation of the classical status of the collection.
Hu Shi is one of the initiators of new poetry in the 1920s,and his work Attempt Collection is the first new poetry collection created by individual,which is of groundbreaking significance in the history of Chinese new poetry. Attempt Collection was published by Yadong Library in March 1920,and had gone through four editions in two years. From the first edition to the fourth edition, Hu Shi had written three prefaces: the first edition, the second edition and the fourth edition. These three prefaces are of great significance, covering creation, criticism, theory, history and other aspects, and are important resources for studying Hu Shi's creation and theory of new poetry. This serie of prefaces not only reflected the evolving landscape of Hu Shi's view of new poetry,but also represented the critical context of the new poetry's emergence period, which has important value of intertextuality. In addition, the way of writing and publishing of these prefaces had played an important role in the formation of the classical status of the collection.
引文
①彭林祥:《新文学序跋研究》,武汉大学博士学位论文,2010年,第32页。
②③(12)(14)胡适:《逼上梁山——文学革命的开始》,曹伯言选编:《胡适自传》,合肥:黄山书社,1986年,第126页,第127页,第403页,第130页。
④(13)(25)胡适:《尝试集·自序》,陈金淦编:《胡适研究资料》,北京:北京十月文艺出版社,1989年,第401页,第403页,第391页。
⑤⑥⑦⑧(17)(18)胡适:《〈尝试集〉再版自序》,陈金淦编:《胡适研究资料》,北京:北京十月文艺出版社,1989年,第407-408页,第406页,第410页,第412页,第405页,第407页。
⑨关于五位名家对胡适删诗的去留建议,在清华大学出版社1998年出版的《北京大学图书馆藏胡适未刊书信日记》第四章“《尝试集》通信”中有详细记载。
⑩(22)(23)(24)胡适:《〈尝试集〉四版自序》,陈金淦编:《胡适研究资料》,北京:北京十月文艺出版社,1989年,第414-415页,第414页,第414页,第414页。
(11)陈方竞:《〈尝试集〉的问世与再版》,《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2011年第3期。
(15)杨治宜、赵凡:《“迷楼”:柳亚子与南社文学古典主义的悖论》,《江汉学术》2018年第2期。
(16)北社编:《一九一九年诗坛记略》,《新诗年选》,上海:亚东图书馆,1922年,第2页。
(19)刘炎生:《中国现代文学论争史》,广州:广东人民出版社,1999年,第58页。
(20)(21)胡怀琛:《〈尝试集〉批评与讨论·序》,《〈尝试集〉批评与讨论》,上海:泰东图书局,1923年,第1页,第2页。
(26)(29)(30)叶伯和:《诗歌集·自序》,《诗歌集》,上海:华东印刷所,1920年,第6页,第6-7页,第7页。
(27)斯蒂文·托托西:《文学研究的合法化》,马瑞琦译,北京:北京大学出版社,1997年,第44页。
(28)胡适:《启事》,《新青年》1919年第6卷6号。
(31)(32)汪原放:《回忆亚东图书馆》,上海:学林出版社,1983年,第52-53页,第53页。
(33)樊宝英等编著:《文学经典理论研究》,济南:山东画报出版社,2007年,第72页。
②③(12)(14)胡适:《逼上梁山——文学革命的开始》,曹伯言选编:《胡适自传》,合肥:黄山书社,1986年,第126页,第127页,第403页,第130页。
④(13)(25)胡适:《尝试集·自序》,陈金淦编:《胡适研究资料》,北京:北京十月文艺出版社,1989年,第401页,第403页,第391页。
⑤⑥⑦⑧(17)(18)胡适:《〈尝试集〉再版自序》,陈金淦编:《胡适研究资料》,北京:北京十月文艺出版社,1989年,第407-408页,第406页,第410页,第412页,第405页,第407页。
⑨关于五位名家对胡适删诗的去留建议,在清华大学出版社1998年出版的《北京大学图书馆藏胡适未刊书信日记》第四章“《尝试集》通信”中有详细记载。
⑩(22)(23)(24)胡适:《〈尝试集〉四版自序》,陈金淦编:《胡适研究资料》,北京:北京十月文艺出版社,1989年,第414-415页,第414页,第414页,第414页。
(11)陈方竞:《〈尝试集〉的问世与再版》,《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2011年第3期。
(15)杨治宜、赵凡:《“迷楼”:柳亚子与南社文学古典主义的悖论》,《江汉学术》2018年第2期。
(16)北社编:《一九一九年诗坛记略》,《新诗年选》,上海:亚东图书馆,1922年,第2页。
(19)刘炎生:《中国现代文学论争史》,广州:广东人民出版社,1999年,第58页。
(20)(21)胡怀琛:《〈尝试集〉批评与讨论·序》,《〈尝试集〉批评与讨论》,上海:泰东图书局,1923年,第1页,第2页。
(26)(29)(30)叶伯和:《诗歌集·自序》,《诗歌集》,上海:华东印刷所,1920年,第6页,第6-7页,第7页。
(27)斯蒂文·托托西:《文学研究的合法化》,马瑞琦译,北京:北京大学出版社,1997年,第44页。
(28)胡适:《启事》,《新青年》1919年第6卷6号。
(31)(32)汪原放:《回忆亚东图书馆》,上海:学林出版社,1983年,第52-53页,第53页。
(33)樊宝英等编著:《文学经典理论研究》,济南:山东画报出版社,2007年,第72页。