健康效用值测量中映射法应用的研究进展
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Application of Mapping in Health Utility Measurement
  • 作者:刘彤 ; 李顺平 ; 陈钢
  • 英文作者:LIU Tong;LI Shun-ping;CHEN Gang;
  • 关键词:映射法 ; 生命质量 ; 量表 ; 健康效用值
  • 英文关键词:Mapping method;;Quality of life;;Scale;;Health utility value
  • 中文刊名:ZYWA
  • 英文刊名:China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics
  • 机构:中国山东大学医药卫生管理学院中国国家卫生与计划生育委员会卫生经济与政策研究重点实验室中国山东大学卫生管理与政策研究中心山东省新型重点智库;Australia Monash University Centre for Health Economics Monash Business School;
  • 出版日期:2018-11-27 14:22
  • 出版单位:中国药物经济学
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.13;No.107
  • 基金:山东省自然科学基金(No.ZR2013GM023)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZYWA201811032
  • 页数:4
  • CN:11
  • ISSN:11-5482/R
  • 分类号:123-126
摘要
由于多属性效用量表对临床疾病测量的敏感性较低,疾病特异性量表无法获取所需的健康效用值。映射法以某一多属性效用量表为目标量表,通过效用值转换模型的构建将非基于偏好的信息转化为健康效用值。这篇文章主要系统梳理了映射法的核心思想、适用模型、应用情况与不足等,为国内开展卫生经济学评价研究,尤其是效用值测量与成本-效用分析研究提供参考与借鉴。
        Due to the low sensitivity of multi-attribute efficacy scales to clinical disease measurements, diseasespecific scales are unable to obtain the required health utility value. The mapping method takes a certain MAU scale as the target scale and constructs the model to turn the non preference-based information into health utility values.This paper systematically sorts out the core idea of mapping method, applicable models, applications and deficiencies.The purpose of the study is to provide basic support for health economic evaluation, especially for health utility measurement and cost-utility Analysis in China.
引文
[1]PHILLIPS D.Quality of Life[M].2006.
    [2]刘国恩.中国药物经济学评价指南及导读(2015版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2015.
    [3]孙宏凯,牛连杰.数学问题处理的方法--映射法[J].数学的实践与认识,2004,34(4):159-161.
    [4]Brazier JE,Yang Y,Tsuchiya A,et al.A review of studies mapping(or cross walking)non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures[J].Eur J Health Econ,2010,11(2):215-225.
    [5]Bosch JL,Hunink MG.The relationship between descriptive and valuational quality-of-life measures in patients with intermittent claudication[J].Med Decis Making,1996,16(3):217-225.
    [6]Dakin H.Review of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D:an online database[J].Health Qual Life Outcomes,2013(11):151.
    [7]付希婧,梁敏洪,孙茂,等.映射法在健康效用值测量中的应用研究[J].中国卫生经济,2014,33(10):32-35.
    [8]周挺,马爱霞.疾病专用量表测量健康效用值的映射研究进展[J].卫生经济研究,2017(7):33-36.
    [9]孙园园,余正,李洪超.健康效用值测量中的映射法及其相关模型概述[J].中国药房,2017,28(29):4045-4049.
    [10]付希婧.映射法在健康效用值测量中的应用研究[D].北京:北京中医药大学,2015.
    [11]Zheng Y,Tang K,Ye L,et al.Mapping the neck disability index to SF-6D in patients with chronic neck pain[J].Health Qual Life Outcomes,2016(14):21.
    [12]Patton T,Hu H,Luan L,et al.Mapping between HAQ-DI and EQ-5D-5L in a Chinese patient population[J].Qual Life Res,2018:4.
    [13]Meregaglia M,Borsoi L,Cairns J,et al.Mapping health-related quality of life scores from FACT-G,FAACT,and FACIT-F onto preference-based EQ-5D-5L utilities in non-small cell lung cancer cachexia[J].Eur J Health Econ,2017:25.
    [14]Wong CK,Lam CL,Wan YF,et al.Predicting SF-6D from the European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire scores in patients with colorectal cancer[J].Value Health,2013,16(2):373-384.
    [15]Wong CKH,Cheung PWH,Samartzis D,et al.Mapping the SRS-22r questionnaire onto the EQ-5D-5L utility score in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis[J].Plos One,2017,12(4):e0175847.
    [16]Wong CKH,Lam CLK,Rowen D,et al.Mapping the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General or-Colorectal to SF-6D in Chinese Patients with Colorectal Neoplasm[J].Value Health,2012,15(3):495-503.
    [17]Yang Y,Wong MY,Lam CL,et al.Improving the mapping of condition-specific health-related quality of life onto SF-6D score[J].Qual Life Res,2014,23(8):2343-2353.
    [18]Ward Fuller G,Hernandez M,Pallot D,et al.Health State Preference Weights for the Glasgow Outcome Scale Following Traumatic Brain Injury:A Systematic Review and Mapping Study[J].Value Health,2017,20(1):141-151.
    [19]Ara R,Kearns B,Vanhout BA,et al.Predicting preference-based utility values using partial proportional odds models[J].BMC Res Notes,2014(7):438.
    [20]Powell JL.Symmetrically Trimmed Least Squares Estmation For Tobit Models[J].Econometrica,1986,54(6):1435-1460.
    [21]Mortimer D,Segal L.Comparing the Incomparable?A Systematic Review of Competing Techniques for Converting Descriptive Measures of Health Status into QALY-Weights[J].Med Decis Making,2008,28(1):66-89.
    [22]Kaambwa B,Billingham L,Bryan S.Mapping utility scores from the Barthel index[J].Eur J Health Econ,2013,14(2):231-241.
    [23]Le QA,Doctor JN.Probabilistic mapping of descriptive health status responses onto health state utilities using Bayesian networks:an empirical analysis converting SF-12 into EQ-5D utility index in a national US sample[J].Med Care,2011,49(5):451-460.
    [24]方积乾.卫生统计学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.
    [25]肖合春,谭德玉.远程会诊满意调查分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2002,12(13):109-110.
    [26]刘璋温.赤池信息量准则AIC及其意义[J].数学的实践与认识,1980(3):65-73.
    [27]储岳中.一类基于贝叶斯信息准则的k均值聚类算法[J].安徽工业大学学报(自科科学版),2010,27(4):409-412.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700