联苯菊酯、溴氰菊酯、虫螨腈对茶园害虫的田间防效
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Differences in Field Control Efficacy Treated with Two Concentrations of Bifenthrin, Deltamethrin, Chlorfenapyr in Tea Plantations
  • 作者:赵之德 ; 李嘉慧 ; 梁涛 ; 李海涛
  • 英文作者:ZHAO Zhi-de;LI Jia-hui;LIANG Tao;LI Hai-tao;Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;Mary Institute and St.Louis Country Day School;
  • 关键词:联苯菊酯 ; 溴氰菊酯 ; 虫螨腈 ; 假眼小绿叶蝉 ; 茶尺蠖 ; 防效
  • 英文关键词:bifenthrin;;deltamethrin;;chlorfenapyr;;Empoasca vitis;;Ectropis oblique;;field efficacy
  • 中文刊名:NYZZ
  • 英文刊名:Agrochemicals
  • 机构:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所陆地表层格局与模拟院重点实验室;中国科学院大学;玛丽学院与圣路易斯学校;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-10
  • 出版单位:农药
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.58
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0201208)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:NYZZ201902021
  • 页数:6
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:21-1210/TQ
  • 分类号:56-61
摘要
[目的]比较联苯菊酯、溴氰菊酯、虫螨腈的常用剂量和减施剂量的防效的差异。[方法]采用喷雾法进行田间药效试验。[结果]10%联苯菊酯乳油的常用剂量150 mL/hm~2和减施剂量105 mL/hm~2对假眼小绿叶蝉的防效无显著差异;2.5%溴氰菊酯乳油常用剂量750 mL/hm~2对茶尺蠖的防效显著高于减施剂量525 mL/hm~2的防效;24%虫螨腈悬浮剂的常用剂量750 mL/hm~2和减施剂量525 mL/hm~2对假眼小绿叶蝉的防效无显著差异。[结论]保证药效不降低的前提下,10%联苯菊酯乳油的常用剂量150 mL/hm~2可降低至105 mL/hm~2喷施,24%虫螨腈悬浮剂的常用剂量750 mL/hm~2可降低至525 mL/hm~2喷施,而2.5%溴氰菊酯乳油按照常用剂量750 mL/hm~2喷施。
        [Aims] The study aims to compare the difference between the common concertration and the reduced concentration of bifenthrin, deltamethrin and chlorfenapyr. [Methods] The field trials were carried out by routine spraying method. [Results] There was no significant difference between the control efficacy of bifenthrin 10% EC against E. vitis at the common concertration(150 mL/ha) and the control efficacy at the reduced concentration(105 mL/ha). The control efficacy of deltamethrin 2.5% EC against E. oblique at the common concertration(750 mL/ha) was significantly higher than that at the reduced concentration(525 mL/ha). There was no significant difference between the control efficacy of chlorfenapyr 24% SC against E. vitis at the common concertration(750 mL/ha) and the control efficacy at the reduced concentration(525 mL/ha). [Conclusions] Under the premise of ensuring that the control efficacy was not reduced, the common concentration(150 mL/ha) of bifenthrin 10% EC could be reduced to 105 mL/ha, and the common concentration(750 mL/ha) of chlorfenapyr 24% SC could be reduced to 525 mL/ha, and the common concentration(750 mL/ha) of deltamethrin 2.5% EC could not be reduced to525 mL/ha.
引文
[1]周铁锋,黄海涛.浙西北茶区茶尺蠖对联苯菊酯等药剂抗药性初步测定[J].茶叶, 2015, 41(4):204-206.
    [2]王金鑫.基于欧盟官网通报不合格茶叶信息分析茶叶农残现状及应对措施[J].中国茶叶, 2018, 40(1):37-39.
    [3] FENG Ming-guang, PU Xiao-ying, YING Sheng-hua, et al.Field Trials of an Oil-based Emulsifiable Formulation ofBeauveria bassiana Conidia and Low Application Rates ofImidacloprid for Control of False-eye Leafhopper Empoascavitis on Tea in Southern China[J]. Crop Prot, 2004, 23(6):489-496.
    [4]杨锟.啶虫脒与联苯菊酯混配防治茶假眼小绿叶蝉的研究(硕士论文)[D].福州:福建农林大学, 2010.
    [5]张武扬,林明雄,张汉鹄.茶小绿叶蝉生长发育与温度的关系[J].安徽农业大学学报, 1997, 24(4):12-15.
    [6] PU Xiao-ying, FENG Ming-guang, SHI Chun-hua. Impact ofThree Application Methods on the Field Efficacy of aBeauveria bassiana-based Mycoinsecticide against the False-eyeLeafhopper, Empoasca vitis(Homoptera:Cicadellidae)in theTea Canopy[J]. Crop Prot, 2005, 24(2):167-175.
    [7]金珊,孙晓玲,陈宗懋,等.不同茶树品种对假眼小绿叶蝉的抗性[J].中国农业科学, 2012, 45(2):255-265.
    [8] MU Dan, CUI Lin, GE Jian, et al. Behavioral Responses forEvaluating the Attractiveness of Specific Tea Shoot Volatilesto the Tea Green Leafhopper, Empoaca vitis[J]. Insect Sci,2012, 19(2):229-238.
    [9]王丹,陈亮.茶树对茶尺蠖抗性机制研究[J].茶叶科学, 2014,34(6):541-547.
    [10]张汉鹄,谭济才.中国茶树害虫及其无公害治理[M].合肥:安徽科学技术出版社, 2004.
    [11]李建宇,史梦竹,傅建炜,等.茶假眼小绿叶蝉抗联苯菊酯品系和敏感品系解毒酶活性及增效作用研究[J].茶叶科学, 2016,36(3):323-329.
    [12]陈宗懋.无公害茶叶生产中拟除虫菊酯类农药的选择[J].中国茶叶, 2002, 24(3):3-4.
    [13]曾明森,夏会龙,王庆森,等.溴氰菊酯茶园残留与使用安全性[J].福建农业学报, 2013(5):494-498.
    [14]徐尚成,蒋木庚.溴虫腈的研究与开发进展[J].农药, 2003, 42(2):7-10.
    [15] LI Hua-xiang, LEE B H. Enhanced Conidial Thermotoleranceand Field Efficacy of Beauveria bassiana by Saccharides[J].Biotechnology Letters, 2014, 36(12):2481-2488.
    [16]占江伟. 10%联苯菊酯EC对茶假眼小绿叶蝉的防治效果[J].茶叶科学技术, 2007(3):14.
    [17]王豪.几种杀虫剂防治茶假眼小绿叶蝉田间药效试验[J].农药科学与管理, 2012, 33(3):42-43.
    [18]周晓东,王润龙,黄亚辉,等.天王星(联苯菊酯)在茶叶生产上的安全性试验[J].茶叶通讯, 2002(3):24-25.
    [19]张强,崔清梅,李慧,等.水溶性农药替代品种对茶园假眼小绿叶蝉的防治效果[J].湖北农业科学, 2015(22):5615-5617.
    [20]李明,袁德奎,梁修仪.生物农药Bt-781对茶尺蠖的防效评价[J].贵州农业科学, 1997, 25(4):26-29.
    [21]戴轩.杀虫蝉防治假眼小绿叶蝉及茶尺蠖的药效试验[J].茶叶,1997, 23(2):36-37.
    [22]朱彩虹,黄俊媛,陈月仙,等.天泰防治茶尺蠖药效试验总结[J].现代农业科技, 2006(11):88-89.
    [23]曾义玲,向占群,李玉顺. 3种药剂对茶尺蠖的防治效果[J].植物医生, 2013, 26(5):38-39.
    [24]洪海林,丁坤明,饶漾萍,等.四种杀虫剂对茶树假眼小绿叶蝉的防治效果[J].湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(19):4273-4275.
    [25]吴全聪,雷永宏,谢沛余,等. 5种新农药对假眼小绿叶蝉的田间防治效果[J].茶叶, 2012, 38(1):24-26.
    [26]肖星,许燕,冉隆珣,等. 5种杀虫剂对茶假眼小绿叶蝉的防效[J].中国植保导刊, 2014, 34(1):66-67.
    [27]赵丰华,吕立哲,任红楼,等. 24%的溴虫腈防治茶尺蠖和假眼小绿叶蝉药效试验研究[J].天津农业科学, 2013, 19(6):64-66.
    [28]王华建,李继,周铁锋,等.虫螨腈防治茶假眼小绿叶蝉试验[J].浙江农业科学, 2012(6):864-865.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700