油气勘探开发项目环境管理成熟度研究
|
摘要
为了探究油气勘探开发项目复杂环境因素间相互影响反馈的关系,衡量项目环境管理能力的高低,通过分析油气勘探开发项目的环境特点,从政治、经济、社会、技术、自然5个方面,借鉴OPM3模型,建立起5个一级指标,17个二级指标的评价指标体系及5个等级的环境管理成熟度模型,并采用专家投票及网络层次分析法(ANP)确定评价指标值及各指标的权重,借助Super Decision软件对油气勘探开发项目的环境管理成熟度进行评估。研究结果表明:①各环境因素之间存在着相互影响的反馈关系,其中技术和自然环境管理能力对油气勘探开发项目的成功具有重要的作用;②项目实例的环境管理成熟处于规范级,要实现向精益级提升,还需加强环境的重视及管理,运用信息化、量化管理手段,提高项目的整体管理水平和成功率。
In order to explore the relationship fed back by the interaction between complex environment factors of oil& gas exploration and development project and measure the project environment management capacity, the environmental characteristics of oil & gas exploration and development project were analyzed. Then, the evaluation index system with 5 first-level indexes and 17 second-level indexes and the five-level environment management maturity model were established from five aspects(politics, economics, society, technology and nature), referring to OPM3 model.Besides, the evaluation index values and the weight of each index were determined by means of expert vote and analytic network process(ANP), and the environment management maturity of oil & gas exploration and development project was evaluated by virtue of the software Super Decision. And the following research results were obtained. First,there are interaction feedback relationships between environment factors, and technological and natural environment management capacity plays an important role in the success of oil & gas exploration and development project. Second, the environment management maturity of the case project is at the specification level, and to upgrade it to the lean level, it is necessary to strengthen environment concern and management and apply the informationized and quantitative management method to improve the overall management level and project success ratio of the project.
In order to explore the relationship fed back by the interaction between complex environment factors of oil& gas exploration and development project and measure the project environment management capacity, the environmental characteristics of oil & gas exploration and development project were analyzed. Then, the evaluation index system with 5 first-level indexes and 17 second-level indexes and the five-level environment management maturity model were established from five aspects(politics, economics, society, technology and nature), referring to OPM3 model.Besides, the evaluation index values and the weight of each index were determined by means of expert vote and analytic network process(ANP), and the environment management maturity of oil & gas exploration and development project was evaluated by virtue of the software Super Decision. And the following research results were obtained. First,there are interaction feedback relationships between environment factors, and technological and natural environment management capacity plays an important role in the success of oil & gas exploration and development project. Second, the environment management maturity of the case project is at the specification level, and to upgrade it to the lean level, it is necessary to strengthen environment concern and management and apply the informationized and quantitative management method to improve the overall management level and project success ratio of the project.
引文
[1]张翼飞.国际钻井工程项目的实践与思考——以中石化江汉钻井公司厄瓜多尔项目为例[J].江汉石油职工大学学报,2010,23(1):66-68.Zhang Yifei. Practice and reflection of international drilling project[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum University of Staff and Workers,2010,23(1):66-68.
[2]杨宝君.国际油气勘探开发项目的风险管理研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学,2003.Yang Baojun. The research on the risk management of international exploration and development projects in oil and gas[D]. Harbin:Harbin Engineering University,2003.
[3]杨林,张丽俊,余晓钟.嵌入环境管理的油气工程项目管理成熟度模型研究[J].天然气技术与经济,2018,12(1):74-77+84.Yang Lin, Zhang Lijun, Yu Xiaozhong. Model research of management maturity for oil and gas engineering project embedded in environmental management[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2018, 12(1):74-77,84.
[4]许勤华,蔡林,刘旭.“一带一路”能源投资政治风险评估[J].国际石油经济,2017,25(4):11-21.Xu Qinhua,Cai Lin,Liu Xu. Political risk assessment of energy investment in the Belt and Road Initiative[J].International Petroleum Economics,2017,25(4):11-21.
[5]管硕,韩冰,郭俊广,等.赤道原则下的海外油气项目融资环境与社会风险管理[J].国际石油经济,2016,24(11):51-55,60.Guan Shuo,Han Bing,Guo Junguang,et al. Environmental and social risk management for oil and gas project financing abroad based on the Equator Principles[J].International Petroleum Economics,2016,24(11):51-55,60.
[6]齐涛.石油工程项目所面临的社会安全风险及解决措施分析[J].化工管理,2014(11):75.Qi Tao. Analysis of social security risks and solutions for petroleum engineering projects[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management,2014(11):75.
[7]李万军,符英涛.石油工程项目管理成熟度等级特征分析[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2014,34(12):210.Li Wanjun,Fu Yingtao. Analysis of management maturity level characteristics of petroleum engineering projects[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality,2014,34(12):210.
[8]余晓钟.石油工程项目管理成熟度评价模型研究[J].当代石油石化,2009,17(4):28-32,50.Yu Xiaozhong. The research on management maturity evaluation model of petroleum engineering projects[J]. Petroleum&Petrochemical Today,2009,17(4):28-32,50.
[9]贺纯纯,王应明.网络层次分析法研究述评[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(3):204-208,213.He Chunchun,Wang Yingming. A review of the analytic network process[J]. Science and Technology Management Research,2014,34(3):204-208,213.
[10]邵强,林向义.基于ANP的国际石油工程项目风险评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(11):127-130.Shao Qiang,Lin Xiangyi. Risks evaluation on international petroleum engineering project based on ANP[J].Science&Technology Progress and Policy, 2010, 27(11):127-130.
[2]杨宝君.国际油气勘探开发项目的风险管理研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学,2003.Yang Baojun. The research on the risk management of international exploration and development projects in oil and gas[D]. Harbin:Harbin Engineering University,2003.
[3]杨林,张丽俊,余晓钟.嵌入环境管理的油气工程项目管理成熟度模型研究[J].天然气技术与经济,2018,12(1):74-77+84.Yang Lin, Zhang Lijun, Yu Xiaozhong. Model research of management maturity for oil and gas engineering project embedded in environmental management[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2018, 12(1):74-77,84.
[4]许勤华,蔡林,刘旭.“一带一路”能源投资政治风险评估[J].国际石油经济,2017,25(4):11-21.Xu Qinhua,Cai Lin,Liu Xu. Political risk assessment of energy investment in the Belt and Road Initiative[J].International Petroleum Economics,2017,25(4):11-21.
[5]管硕,韩冰,郭俊广,等.赤道原则下的海外油气项目融资环境与社会风险管理[J].国际石油经济,2016,24(11):51-55,60.Guan Shuo,Han Bing,Guo Junguang,et al. Environmental and social risk management for oil and gas project financing abroad based on the Equator Principles[J].International Petroleum Economics,2016,24(11):51-55,60.
[6]齐涛.石油工程项目所面临的社会安全风险及解决措施分析[J].化工管理,2014(11):75.Qi Tao. Analysis of social security risks and solutions for petroleum engineering projects[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management,2014(11):75.
[7]李万军,符英涛.石油工程项目管理成熟度等级特征分析[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2014,34(12):210.Li Wanjun,Fu Yingtao. Analysis of management maturity level characteristics of petroleum engineering projects[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality,2014,34(12):210.
[8]余晓钟.石油工程项目管理成熟度评价模型研究[J].当代石油石化,2009,17(4):28-32,50.Yu Xiaozhong. The research on management maturity evaluation model of petroleum engineering projects[J]. Petroleum&Petrochemical Today,2009,17(4):28-32,50.
[9]贺纯纯,王应明.网络层次分析法研究述评[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(3):204-208,213.He Chunchun,Wang Yingming. A review of the analytic network process[J]. Science and Technology Management Research,2014,34(3):204-208,213.
[10]邵强,林向义.基于ANP的国际石油工程项目风险评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(11):127-130.Shao Qiang,Lin Xiangyi. Risks evaluation on international petroleum engineering project based on ANP[J].Science&Technology Progress and Policy, 2010, 27(11):127-130.