热牙胶垂直加压充填与冷牙胶侧方加压充填治疗牙髓炎和根尖周炎的效果比较
|
摘要
目的比较热牙胶垂直加压充填与冷牙胶侧方加压充填治疗牙髓炎和根尖周炎的临床效果。方法选择我所门诊口腔科2016年1月至2017年6月牙髓炎或根尖周炎患者78例,随机分成对照组与观察组,各39例。对照组用冷牙胶侧方加压充填治疗,观察组给予热牙胶垂直加压充填治疗。观察比较两组患者的手术时间和临床疗效。结果观察组平均手术时间为(17.29±3.85)min,短于对照组的(28.17±5.64)min,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组治疗总有效率明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与传统冷牙胶侧方加压充填技术相比,热牙胶垂直加压充填治疗牙髓炎和根尖周炎可明显缩短手术时间,提高治疗有效率,值得临床推广与应用。
Objective To comparison of clinical effects between hot gum vertical compression filling and cold gum lateral compression filling in the treatment of pulpitis and periapical periodontitis. Methods From January 2016 to June 2017, 78 patients with pulpitis or periapical periodontitis were randomly divided into control group and observation group,with 39 cases in each group. The control group was treated with cold gum lateral compression filling, and the observation group was treated with hot gum vertical compression filling. The operative time and clinical effects of the two groups were observed and compared. Results The average operative time in the observation group was(17.29 ±3.85) min, which was significantly shorter than(28.17 ±5.64) min in the control group(P <0.05). The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the cold gum lateral compression filling, the hot gum vertical compression filling in the treatment of pulpitis and periapical periodontitis can obviously shorten the operation time, improve the effective rate of treatment, and it is worth popularizing and applying.
Objective To comparison of clinical effects between hot gum vertical compression filling and cold gum lateral compression filling in the treatment of pulpitis and periapical periodontitis. Methods From January 2016 to June 2017, 78 patients with pulpitis or periapical periodontitis were randomly divided into control group and observation group,with 39 cases in each group. The control group was treated with cold gum lateral compression filling, and the observation group was treated with hot gum vertical compression filling. The operative time and clinical effects of the two groups were observed and compared. Results The average operative time in the observation group was(17.29 ±3.85) min, which was significantly shorter than(28.17 ±5.64) min in the control group(P <0.05). The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the cold gum lateral compression filling, the hot gum vertical compression filling in the treatment of pulpitis and periapical periodontitis can obviously shorten the operation time, improve the effective rate of treatment, and it is worth popularizing and applying.
引文
[1]王嘉德.牙体牙髓病学[M].北京:北京医科大学出版社,2006:418.
[2]彭澜,陈建钢.不同根管充填方法和根管封闭剂根尖微渗漏的研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2012,28(1):53-55.
[3]赵锦辉,裴红梅,于玲.热牙胶充填与冷牙胶侧方加压在根管充填中应用的临床效果比较[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2014,13(23):1947-1949.
[4]黄玉球.热牙胶充填与冷牙胶侧方加压的根管充填效果比较[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2014,23(9):965-967.
[5]向秀兰,王笑威,雷港.热牙胶辅助的单尖法在治疗慢性根尖周炎中的疗效评价[J].中国保健营养,2016,26(14):185.
[6]律娜,孙明,韩晓兰.应用E&Q热牙胶连续波一次性充填感染根管的疗效分析[J].安徽医科大学学报,2014,49(8):1150-1153.
[7]何爱娥,汪春仙,高婵.两种热牙胶垂直加压法进行根管充填的临床疗效观察[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2016,32(7):429-431
[8]郭蕾,启瑞,李英英,等.改良冷牙胶侧方加压技术的应用体会[J].河北医科大学学报,2011,32(10):1195-1196.
[9]张东星.老年人磨牙根管充填热牙胶应用体会[J].基层医学论坛,2012,16(8):953-954.
[10]汤益慧.热牙胶充填与冷牙胶侧方加压在根管充填中的应用效果比较[J].中国现代医生,2015,53(33):67-69.
[2]彭澜,陈建钢.不同根管充填方法和根管封闭剂根尖微渗漏的研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2012,28(1):53-55.
[3]赵锦辉,裴红梅,于玲.热牙胶充填与冷牙胶侧方加压在根管充填中应用的临床效果比较[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2014,13(23):1947-1949.
[4]黄玉球.热牙胶充填与冷牙胶侧方加压的根管充填效果比较[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2014,23(9):965-967.
[5]向秀兰,王笑威,雷港.热牙胶辅助的单尖法在治疗慢性根尖周炎中的疗效评价[J].中国保健营养,2016,26(14):185.
[6]律娜,孙明,韩晓兰.应用E&Q热牙胶连续波一次性充填感染根管的疗效分析[J].安徽医科大学学报,2014,49(8):1150-1153.
[7]何爱娥,汪春仙,高婵.两种热牙胶垂直加压法进行根管充填的临床疗效观察[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2016,32(7):429-431
[8]郭蕾,启瑞,李英英,等.改良冷牙胶侧方加压技术的应用体会[J].河北医科大学学报,2011,32(10):1195-1196.
[9]张东星.老年人磨牙根管充填热牙胶应用体会[J].基层医学论坛,2012,16(8):953-954.
[10]汤益慧.热牙胶充填与冷牙胶侧方加压在根管充填中的应用效果比较[J].中国现代医生,2015,53(33):67-69.