摘要
茅草山铜矿V_4矿体为南坡河北侧的水文地质单元内,赋存于勐野井组下段(E_1m~1)裂隙含水层内,顶板为勐野井组上段(E_1m~2)裂隙含水层,底板为曼宽河组上段(K_2m~2)裂隙含水层,三者含水层将构成矿床充水的主要来源;首采区离南坡河较近,矿体赋存标高低于南坡河水面标高,南坡河在矿坑疏干影响半径范围之内,亦将成为矿坑充水的重要来源;属典型的以裂隙含水层充水矿床;据此构建水文地质概念模型,采用常规解析法对涌水量进行计算,使用比拟法,对涌水量进行计算、验证。
The thatch Mountain Copper Mine V_4 orebody hydrogeological unit for side slope of Hebei, located in MENGYEJING group under paragraph (E_1m~1) of fractured aquifer, roof MENGYEJING formation (E_1m~2) fractured aquifer, the upper floor Manchester wide river group (K_2m~2) fractured aquifer, the main source of three who will constitute the deposit water filling aquifer; the first mining area near the South River, South River water below the orebody occurrence elevation elevation, the southern slope of river dry radius of influence in the mine drainage, will also become an important source of water filling; a typical fractured aquifer by filling water bed; based on the hydrogeological concept the model, using conventional analytical method to calculate the water inflow, using analogy method, we calculated and verified on water.
引文
[1]云南省地质局第二区域地质调查大队.1:20万区域地质报告(勐腊幅、尚勇幅)-矿产部分[R].玉溪:云南省地质局,1976.
[2]云南省勐腊县茅草山铜矿勘探报告[R].昆明:西南有色昆明勘测设计(院),2016.
[3]李玲玲“.大井法”在矿坑涌水量预测中的应用——以郎溪钒矿区为例[J].地下水,2015,37(01):14-15.
[4]刘玮.解析法在矿坑涌水量预测中的应用[J].黑龙江科技信息,2012,(16):26.
[5]韩玉杰,陶月赞,周蜜,王菲.基于数值法和解析法的矿坑涌水量预测对比分析[J].水利科技与经济,2014,20(10):7-9+18.
[6]王龙.水文地质比拟法在矿坑涌水量预测中的应用[A]..2016年江西省地质学会论文汇编集III[C].:,2017:5.
[7]傅大庆.大井法及水文地质比拟法在某矿山矿坑涌水量预测中的应用对比[J].西部探矿工程,2016,28(01):139-141.