民法典编纂视角下保证人先诉抗辩权限制的立法完善

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Legislative Perfection about the Limit of Guarantor 's Prelitigation Demur Right in the View of Civil Code Compiling 作者：席振波 英文作者：XI Zhen-bo;School of Civil and Commercial law,Northwest University of Politics and Law; 关键词：先诉抗辩权 ; 保证人 ; 一般保证 英文关键词：right of first defense;;guarantor;;general guarantee 中文刊名：SDQG 英文刊名：Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science 机构：西北政法大学; 出版日期：2017-03-10 出版单位：山东青年政治学院学报 年：2017 期：v.33;No.186 语种：中文; 页：SDQG201702018 页数：6 CN：02 ISSN：37-1481/D 分类号：103-108

摘要

先诉抗辩权作为一般保证人的专属抗辩事由,在当前制定民法典物权编的视角下,这一权利对维护保证人的合法权益,平衡保证关系中各方的利益具有举足轻重的作用。对目前我国立法中先诉抗辩权限制的局限性进行分析,阐述我国立法对先诉抗辩权限制存在的不足,借鉴其他国家的立法经验对民法典物权编编纂中先诉抗辩权限制的完善提出了建议,从而能够推动权利运作的规范性要求,维护债权人的利益。
        In the context of the current formulation of the Civil Code property rights,the right to sue the right of counterfeiting as a general guarantor,can safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the guarantor,balance between the interests of the parties to play a pivotal role. Through the analysis of the limitation of the right of preemption in the current legislation,the paper expounds the shortcomings of our legislation on the limitation of the right of precedent defense,and draws lessons from the legislative experience of other countries about restricting the guarantor's prelitigation demur right and then offers recommendations,all of which can promote the operation of the normative requirements,safeguard the interests of creditors.

引文

[1]唐德华.最新担保法实用问答[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2005.
    [2]高圣平.担保法论[M].北京:法律出版社,2009.
    [3]王利明.民商法研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2014.
    [4]韩松.民法分论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2014.
    [5]张广兴.债法总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
    [6]郭明瑞.担保法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
    [7]汪渊智,侯怀霞.论保证人的先诉抗辩权[J],中国法学,1997,(2).
    [8]曹诗权.保证人之专属抗辩权初探[J].河北法学,1998,(4).
    [9]邹海林,常敏著.债权担保的方式和应用[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2011.
    [10]李开国.民法基本问题研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2009.