基于叶绿素SPAD值分析甘蔗对除草剂反应的差异
|
摘要
对云南蔗区10个主栽品种喷施不同浓度的莠灭净、二甲四氯和敌草隆3种蔗田常用除草剂,基于叶绿素SPAD值变化特征和叶片表型,探讨不同甘蔗品种对除草剂的反应差异。结果表明,云蔗05-51、柳城03-1137和粤糖93-159对莠灭净和敌草隆反应敏感,喷施前后叶绿素SPAD值差异极显著,但2种除草剂浓度对云蔗05-51叶绿素SPAD值影响不显著,而柳城03-1137和粤糖93-159叶绿素SPAD值则随着莠灭净喷施浓度的增加而显著下降。云蔗05-51、柳城03-1137和粤糖93-159对二甲四氯反应不敏感。新台糖22号、桂糖29号、柳城05-136、德蔗09-78、云蔗01-1413、福农41号、粤糖60号叶绿素SPAD值在喷施3种除草剂前后差异均不显著,且不随除草剂浓度的变化而变化。
In this study,the response of 10 sugarcane varieties from Yunnan sugarcane areas to the application of three herbicides(ametryn,diuron and chipton) at difference concentrations was analyzed based on chlorophyll SPAD values and the leaf morphology. The results showed that varieties Yunzhe 05-51,Liucheng 03-1137,and Yuetang 93-159 were sensitive to ametryn and diuron applications. The difference of chlorophyll SPAD values before and after herbicide application was highly significantly different. Herbicide concentrations had no significant effect on chlorophyll SPAD values of Yunzhe 05-51; however,the chlorophyll SPAD values of Liucheng 03-1137 and Yuetang 93-159 decreased significantly when the ametryn concentration increased. Yunzhe 05-51,Liucheng 03-1137,and Yuetang 93-159 were not sensitive to herbicide chipton. The chlorophyll SPAD values of Xintaitang 22,Guitang 29,Liucheng 05-136,Dezhe 09-78,Yunzhe 01-1413,Funong 41 and Yuetang 60 were not significantly different before and after application of the three herbicides. These values did not change with different concentrations of herbicides,indicating that these seven varieties are not sensitive to all three herbicides.
In this study,the response of 10 sugarcane varieties from Yunnan sugarcane areas to the application of three herbicides(ametryn,diuron and chipton) at difference concentrations was analyzed based on chlorophyll SPAD values and the leaf morphology. The results showed that varieties Yunzhe 05-51,Liucheng 03-1137,and Yuetang 93-159 were sensitive to ametryn and diuron applications. The difference of chlorophyll SPAD values before and after herbicide application was highly significantly different. Herbicide concentrations had no significant effect on chlorophyll SPAD values of Yunzhe 05-51; however,the chlorophyll SPAD values of Liucheng 03-1137 and Yuetang 93-159 decreased significantly when the ametryn concentration increased. Yunzhe 05-51,Liucheng 03-1137,and Yuetang 93-159 were not sensitive to herbicide chipton. The chlorophyll SPAD values of Xintaitang 22,Guitang 29,Liucheng 05-136,Dezhe 09-78,Yunzhe 01-1413,Funong 41 and Yuetang 60 were not significantly different before and after application of the three herbicides. These values did not change with different concentrations of herbicides,indicating that these seven varieties are not sensitive to all three herbicides.
引文
[1]谭娟,郭晋川,吴建强,等.不同灌溉方式下甘蔗光合特性[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(11):150-158.
[2]杨善,江永,周鸿凯,等.甘蔗光合因子与品质性状的典型相关性分析[J].作物杂志,2015(4):69-73.
[3]胡桂娟,刘嘉芬,刘寄明.苹果叶片叶绿素含量和淀粉滞留量对光合作用的影响[J].山东农业科学,1994(2):48-50.
[4]徐照丽,杨彦明,卢秀萍,等.不同烤烟品种叶绿素SPAD值的变化特征[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,36(5):499-501.
[5]陈晓群,尹学红,张学军,等.基于冬小麦叶绿素值推荐氮肥追施量的研究初报[J].宁夏农林科技,2010(2):5-6.
[6]李梅,徐明珠,何勇,等.马铃薯晚疫病叶片SPAD值的高光谱研究[J].农机化研究,2016,38(12):136-142.
[7]何军,常元莉,李雪蓉,等.节灌条件缓释肥对水稻株高、分蘖、叶绿素及产量的影响[J].中国农村水利水电,2016(3):7-9.
[8]邢其乡,疏冕,刘薇薇,等.不同荔枝品种叶片SPAD值与叶绿素含量相关性的拟合曲线研究[J].华南农业大学学报,2010,31(1):117-118,121.
[9]王鑫,郭平毅,原向阳,等.2甲4氯对罂粟叶绿素含量及光合作用的影响[J].山西农业科学,2009,37(7):48-50.
[10]刘欢,慕平,赵桂琴,等.不同剂量除草剂对皮、裸燕麦光合特性及产量形成的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2017,35(6):124-133,234.
[11]段维兴,刘许辉,杨海霞,等.4种除草剂对甘蔗新品种产量及构成因素的影响[J].作物研究,2012,26(5):504-507.
[12]王正航,崔东亮,马宏娟,等.SPAD值在内吸传导型除草剂药效评价中的应用[J].农药,2012,51(6):461-463.
[13]刘阳,郭平毅,原向阳,等.叶面喷施二甲四氯对‘张杂谷10号’光合特性及产量构成的影响[J].西北农业学报,2016,25(9):1 311-1 318.
[14]潘义宏,顾毓敏,杨森,等.不同品种中部烟叶SPAD值及其与叶绿素含量的相关性分析[J].河南农业大学学报,2017,51(2):156-162.
[15]李鹏程,董合林,刘爱忠,等.棉花上部叶片叶绿素SPAD值动态变化研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(3):121-126.
[16]王冰,张羽震,贺文美,等.山桃叶片叶绿素SPAD值颜色特征与时空特征分析[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(5):311-315.
[17]赵菊,朱旭东,严钦泉,等.杂交水稻功能叶片叶绿素SPAD值的杂种优势分析[J].作物研究,2012,26(2):103-110.
[18]李忠南,王克伟,王越人,等.玉米品种先玉335苗期叶绿素SPAD值的遗传分析[J].作物杂志,2016(4):101-104.
[19]张殿京,王建莉.芦笋地的化学除草[J].江苏杂草科学,1986(4):28-29.
[20]SINGH M,张云贵.除草剂对柑桔生长及杂草种群的影响[J].热带作物译丛,1991(1):39-41,24.
[21]高英,伊米尔,张勇.25%敌草隆棉田除草防效试验[J].新疆农业科技,1999(3):22.
[22]方志存,刀静梅,樊仙,等.甘蔗叶片SPAD值与含氮量及相关分析[J].福建农业学报,2015,30(6):622-624.
[23]黄瑶珠,杨友军,陈明周.56%二甲四氯钠对不同甘蔗品种苗期生长的影响[J].广东农业科学,2013,40(14):35-37.
[2]杨善,江永,周鸿凯,等.甘蔗光合因子与品质性状的典型相关性分析[J].作物杂志,2015(4):69-73.
[3]胡桂娟,刘嘉芬,刘寄明.苹果叶片叶绿素含量和淀粉滞留量对光合作用的影响[J].山东农业科学,1994(2):48-50.
[4]徐照丽,杨彦明,卢秀萍,等.不同烤烟品种叶绿素SPAD值的变化特征[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,36(5):499-501.
[5]陈晓群,尹学红,张学军,等.基于冬小麦叶绿素值推荐氮肥追施量的研究初报[J].宁夏农林科技,2010(2):5-6.
[6]李梅,徐明珠,何勇,等.马铃薯晚疫病叶片SPAD值的高光谱研究[J].农机化研究,2016,38(12):136-142.
[7]何军,常元莉,李雪蓉,等.节灌条件缓释肥对水稻株高、分蘖、叶绿素及产量的影响[J].中国农村水利水电,2016(3):7-9.
[8]邢其乡,疏冕,刘薇薇,等.不同荔枝品种叶片SPAD值与叶绿素含量相关性的拟合曲线研究[J].华南农业大学学报,2010,31(1):117-118,121.
[9]王鑫,郭平毅,原向阳,等.2甲4氯对罂粟叶绿素含量及光合作用的影响[J].山西农业科学,2009,37(7):48-50.
[10]刘欢,慕平,赵桂琴,等.不同剂量除草剂对皮、裸燕麦光合特性及产量形成的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2017,35(6):124-133,234.
[11]段维兴,刘许辉,杨海霞,等.4种除草剂对甘蔗新品种产量及构成因素的影响[J].作物研究,2012,26(5):504-507.
[12]王正航,崔东亮,马宏娟,等.SPAD值在内吸传导型除草剂药效评价中的应用[J].农药,2012,51(6):461-463.
[13]刘阳,郭平毅,原向阳,等.叶面喷施二甲四氯对‘张杂谷10号’光合特性及产量构成的影响[J].西北农业学报,2016,25(9):1 311-1 318.
[14]潘义宏,顾毓敏,杨森,等.不同品种中部烟叶SPAD值及其与叶绿素含量的相关性分析[J].河南农业大学学报,2017,51(2):156-162.
[15]李鹏程,董合林,刘爱忠,等.棉花上部叶片叶绿素SPAD值动态变化研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(3):121-126.
[16]王冰,张羽震,贺文美,等.山桃叶片叶绿素SPAD值颜色特征与时空特征分析[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(5):311-315.
[17]赵菊,朱旭东,严钦泉,等.杂交水稻功能叶片叶绿素SPAD值的杂种优势分析[J].作物研究,2012,26(2):103-110.
[18]李忠南,王克伟,王越人,等.玉米品种先玉335苗期叶绿素SPAD值的遗传分析[J].作物杂志,2016(4):101-104.
[19]张殿京,王建莉.芦笋地的化学除草[J].江苏杂草科学,1986(4):28-29.
[20]SINGH M,张云贵.除草剂对柑桔生长及杂草种群的影响[J].热带作物译丛,1991(1):39-41,24.
[21]高英,伊米尔,张勇.25%敌草隆棉田除草防效试验[J].新疆农业科技,1999(3):22.
[22]方志存,刀静梅,樊仙,等.甘蔗叶片SPAD值与含氮量及相关分析[J].福建农业学报,2015,30(6):622-624.
[23]黄瑶珠,杨友军,陈明周.56%二甲四氯钠对不同甘蔗品种苗期生长的影响[J].广东农业科学,2013,40(14):35-37.