国家治理视阈下全国性单项运动协会改革与发展的现实审视与推进策略
|
摘要
运用文献资料法、实地调研和逻辑分析等方法,提炼国家治理视域下全国性单项运动协会改革与发展"应然"面貌,据此审视项目协会改革现实图景并提出对策。认为,项目协会改革由管理到治理引发治理目的、理念、结构、体制、手段的五大转变。项目协会改革因管理向治理转型而面对着合法性难题、改革价值迷离、管理体制的刚性与固化、法人治理不健全、立法滞后于改革等问题。回应国家治理调整姿态和社会期盼,应进一步明确协会"独立社团法人实体"改革目标,强化制度化供给;推动考评机制、信息导向机制及衔接机制再造;由"行政化控制"向"体制性吸纳"转变,做实"中华体育总会、中国奥委会",逐步撤销项目管理中心,分类推进协会改革;出台《社会组织基本法》,加快《体育法》的修订等。
This paper refined the " should" face of national single sports associations reform under the perspective of national governance,and reflected its realistic situation and development strategy through the methods of literature,field survey and logical analysis. The results suggest that the reform of project associations from management to governance leads to five major changes in objective,concept,structure,system,and means. In reality,it will encounter such problems as legitimacy,blurred value of reform,rigidity and solidification of the management system,incomplete corporate governance structure,and legislation lagging behind reform. In response to the national governance requirements and social anticipations,we should further clarify the reform objectives of associations' " independent corporate legal entity",strengthen the institutionalized supply; renovate the evaluation mechanism,information-oriented mechanism and the liaison mechanism; transform the " administrative control" to " institutional encompassing",consolidate " the China Sports Association" and " China Olympics Committee",and gradually remove the project centers,and promote the reform of associations step by step; adopt the " Basic Law on Social Organizations" and speeds up the revision of " Sports Law".
This paper refined the " should" face of national single sports associations reform under the perspective of national governance,and reflected its realistic situation and development strategy through the methods of literature,field survey and logical analysis. The results suggest that the reform of project associations from management to governance leads to five major changes in objective,concept,structure,system,and means. In reality,it will encounter such problems as legitimacy,blurred value of reform,rigidity and solidification of the management system,incomplete corporate governance structure,and legislation lagging behind reform. In response to the national governance requirements and social anticipations,we should further clarify the reform objectives of associations' " independent corporate legal entity",strengthen the institutionalized supply; renovate the evaluation mechanism,information-oriented mechanism and the liaison mechanism; transform the " administrative control" to " institutional encompassing",consolidate " the China Sports Association" and " China Olympics Committee",and gradually remove the project centers,and promote the reform of associations step by step; adopt the " Basic Law on Social Organizations" and speeds up the revision of " Sports Law".
引文
[1]俞可平.论国家治理现代化[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2015:18.
[2]王诗宗.治理理论及其中国适用性[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2009:4.
[3]高丙中.社会团体的合法性问题[J].中国社会科学,2000(2):100-109.
[4]汪流.全国性单项体育协会改革的回顾与思考[J].社团管理研究,2009(5):33-36.
[5]罗思蜻.我国体育行业自治及其法律规制重构[J].北京体育大学学报,2017,40(3):16-23.
[6]易剑东,施秋波.论完善中国足球法人治理结构的关键问题——写在《中国足球改革总体方案》颁布一周年[J].体育学刊,2016,23(3):1-8
[7]刘国勇,裴立新.中国体育社会组织发展报告·2016[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016:94.
[8]赵毅.王扬.以市场经营权能为依托的地方足协自治路径研究[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(1):57-64.
[9]姜熙.开启中国体育产业发展法治保障的破局之路—基于中国体育反垄断第一案的思考[J]上海体育学院学报,2017,41(2):47-54.
[10]李启迪,周妍.全国性单项运动协会现状与发展对策研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2012,35(12):29-35.
[11]彭昕,周小敏,罗雅莉.对体育自治章程及其瑕疵的法理管窥[J].山东体育学院学报,2011,27(7):5-11.
[12]何强.转变体育发展方式进程中的项目协会改革[J].北京体育大学学报,2015,38(1):15-24.
[13]张伟.我国体育社会组织治理结构分析[J].体育学刊,2017,24(4):22-30.
[14]鲍明晓,李元伟.转变我国竞技体育发展方式的对策研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2014,37(1):9-23.
[15]朱峰.将修改运行体制不会变.中国新闻网.[EB/OL][2014-6-26]. http://www. chinanews. com/gn/2014/06-26/6324305. shtml.
[16]税冰.非营利法人解释——民事主体理论视角[M].北京:法律出版社,2010:22.
[17]杨丽芳.我国单项运动协会体制改革研究[J].南京体育学院学报(社会科学版),2015,29(6):42-47.
[18]向会英.体育自治与国家法治的互动——兼评Pechstein案和FIFA受贿案对体育自治的影响[J].上海体育学院学报,2016,40(4):42-49.
[2]王诗宗.治理理论及其中国适用性[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2009:4.
[3]高丙中.社会团体的合法性问题[J].中国社会科学,2000(2):100-109.
[4]汪流.全国性单项体育协会改革的回顾与思考[J].社团管理研究,2009(5):33-36.
[5]罗思蜻.我国体育行业自治及其法律规制重构[J].北京体育大学学报,2017,40(3):16-23.
[6]易剑东,施秋波.论完善中国足球法人治理结构的关键问题——写在《中国足球改革总体方案》颁布一周年[J].体育学刊,2016,23(3):1-8
[7]刘国勇,裴立新.中国体育社会组织发展报告·2016[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016:94.
[8]赵毅.王扬.以市场经营权能为依托的地方足协自治路径研究[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(1):57-64.
[9]姜熙.开启中国体育产业发展法治保障的破局之路—基于中国体育反垄断第一案的思考[J]上海体育学院学报,2017,41(2):47-54.
[10]李启迪,周妍.全国性单项运动协会现状与发展对策研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2012,35(12):29-35.
[11]彭昕,周小敏,罗雅莉.对体育自治章程及其瑕疵的法理管窥[J].山东体育学院学报,2011,27(7):5-11.
[12]何强.转变体育发展方式进程中的项目协会改革[J].北京体育大学学报,2015,38(1):15-24.
[13]张伟.我国体育社会组织治理结构分析[J].体育学刊,2017,24(4):22-30.
[14]鲍明晓,李元伟.转变我国竞技体育发展方式的对策研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2014,37(1):9-23.
[15]朱峰.将修改运行体制不会变.中国新闻网.[EB/OL][2014-6-26]. http://www. chinanews. com/gn/2014/06-26/6324305. shtml.
[16]税冰.非营利法人解释——民事主体理论视角[M].北京:法律出版社,2010:22.
[17]杨丽芳.我国单项运动协会体制改革研究[J].南京体育学院学报(社会科学版),2015,29(6):42-47.
[18]向会英.体育自治与国家法治的互动——兼评Pechstein案和FIFA受贿案对体育自治的影响[J].上海体育学院学报,2016,40(4):42-49.