运用教育测量理论评价八年制眼科学成绩与试卷质量
|
摘要
目的运用教育测量学理论,客观评价西安交通大学2010级和2012级临床医学专业八年制眼科学考试成绩和试卷质量,利用考试的教学信息反馈功能,推动教学工作的改进,提高教学质量。方法采用Excel和SPSS统计软件,对成绩和试卷质量进行评价。成绩评介指标包括平均分、标准差、正态性检验、成绩分布频数等;试卷质量评价指标包括信度(r)、效度、难度(P)和区分度(D)等。结果 2010和2012级平均成绩分别为85.91和73.87分,标准差为9.36和7.67,信度系数分别为0.84和0.48,偏态值分别为0.77和0.54,符合正态分布;试卷难度系数分别为0.81和0.73,区分度分别为0.24和0.20。结论两个年级的试卷信度、区分度均一般,2010级略优于2012级;在难度上,2010级偏易,2012级难度适中;两份试卷的质量均一般,试题质量有待提高。
Objective Using education theory to evaluate the quality of ophthalmology final examination paper for eight-year system medical students enrolled in 2010 and 2012 from Xi'an Jiaotong University,analyzing the examination results and feeding back to the teachers,to promote and improve the teaching quality of ophthalmology.Methods Statistical analysis was made on the final examination results of ophthalmology for students enrolled in 2010 and 2012.The average score,standard deviation,distribution frequency,difficulty coefficient,discrimination degree and reliability coefficient of the examination papers were calculated.Results The students enrolled in 2010 scores and examination papers showed the mean of scores being 85.91±9.36,the reliability coefficient being 0.84,difficulty coefficient being 0.81,discrimination degree being 0.24.And the students enrolled in 2012 scores and examination papers showed the mean of scores being 73.87±7.67,the reliability coefficient being 0.48,difficulty coefficient being 0.73.discrimination degree being 0.20.Both examination papers of 2010 and2012 appears normal distribution.Conclusion The reliability coefficient and discrimination degree of both examination papers of the students enrolled in 2010 and 2012 are ordinary.2010 just a little better than 2012.The difficulty of the 2012's test paper is easier,2010's is moderate,Two examination results are real and objective,but the quality need to improve.
Objective Using education theory to evaluate the quality of ophthalmology final examination paper for eight-year system medical students enrolled in 2010 and 2012 from Xi'an Jiaotong University,analyzing the examination results and feeding back to the teachers,to promote and improve the teaching quality of ophthalmology.Methods Statistical analysis was made on the final examination results of ophthalmology for students enrolled in 2010 and 2012.The average score,standard deviation,distribution frequency,difficulty coefficient,discrimination degree and reliability coefficient of the examination papers were calculated.Results The students enrolled in 2010 scores and examination papers showed the mean of scores being 85.91±9.36,the reliability coefficient being 0.84,difficulty coefficient being 0.81,discrimination degree being 0.24.And the students enrolled in 2012 scores and examination papers showed the mean of scores being 73.87±7.67,the reliability coefficient being 0.48,difficulty coefficient being 0.73.discrimination degree being 0.20.Both examination papers of 2010 and2012 appears normal distribution.Conclusion The reliability coefficient and discrimination degree of both examination papers of the students enrolled in 2010 and 2012 are ordinary.2010 just a little better than 2012.The difficulty of the 2012's test paper is easier,2010's is moderate,Two examination results are real and objective,but the quality need to improve.
引文
[1]第六届中国八年制医学教育峰会.八年制医学教育临床教学培养目标与基本要求[J].医学教育探索,2010,9(2):286-287.
[2]王渊.考试质量分析系统的设计[J].医学教育探索,2010,9(9):971-974.
[3]景汇泉,张颖,郭永松,等.医学考试评价的研究进展[J].中国高等医学教育,2009(7):36-37.
[4]王小燕.MSExcel数据分析在成绩分析暨试卷质量评估的应用[J].现代教育技术,2009,20(10):135-137.
[5]袁作雄.试题定量分析指标及其在SAS软件中的实现方法[J].数理医药学杂志,2010,23(5):576-578.
[6]刘敏钰.运用SPSS、Excel进行试卷质量分析初探[J].陕西教育学院学报,2004,20(4):102-105.
[7]张玲玲,梅忠义.对学生成绩评价指标体系中一些问题的思考[J].合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,20(2):19-21.
[8]崔国生,张楠,李卓玲.试卷分析与评价系统的主要指标及关键问题处理[J].沈阳工程学院学报(社会科学版),2011,7(3):401-403.
[9]张云松.综合评价试卷质量分析方法[J].数理统计与管理,2009,28(2):232-236.
[10]赵电红,董美丽,刘立婷,等.八年制口腔医学专业口腔临床药物学期末考试成绩和试卷质量分析与评价[J].中国高等医学教育,2017(6):67-69.
[11]牛学敏.相关系数在试卷质量分析中的应用[J].考试研究,2007,3(4):64-70.
[2]王渊.考试质量分析系统的设计[J].医学教育探索,2010,9(9):971-974.
[3]景汇泉,张颖,郭永松,等.医学考试评价的研究进展[J].中国高等医学教育,2009(7):36-37.
[4]王小燕.MSExcel数据分析在成绩分析暨试卷质量评估的应用[J].现代教育技术,2009,20(10):135-137.
[5]袁作雄.试题定量分析指标及其在SAS软件中的实现方法[J].数理医药学杂志,2010,23(5):576-578.
[6]刘敏钰.运用SPSS、Excel进行试卷质量分析初探[J].陕西教育学院学报,2004,20(4):102-105.
[7]张玲玲,梅忠义.对学生成绩评价指标体系中一些问题的思考[J].合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,20(2):19-21.
[8]崔国生,张楠,李卓玲.试卷分析与评价系统的主要指标及关键问题处理[J].沈阳工程学院学报(社会科学版),2011,7(3):401-403.
[9]张云松.综合评价试卷质量分析方法[J].数理统计与管理,2009,28(2):232-236.
[10]赵电红,董美丽,刘立婷,等.八年制口腔医学专业口腔临床药物学期末考试成绩和试卷质量分析与评价[J].中国高等医学教育,2017(6):67-69.
[11]牛学敏.相关系数在试卷质量分析中的应用[J].考试研究,2007,3(4):64-70.