日本诗话视阈中的杨万里
|
摘要
日本诗话对杨万里的关注主要着眼于其诗艺及诗学思想,对杨万里"清新""尖巧"诗风有清晰的体认,在褒扬杨诗之妙的同时,对其诗风轻率之弊亦有探讨,对其"浅切俚俗"之诗风、"触物感兴"等诗学思想也有双重考量。从日本汉诗话中对杨万里诗艺的讨论,对其诗的释读、摘引与品评,对其诗论的广泛征引、评论以及对其诗歌的推崇及拟写,均可窥见日本汉诗界对杨万里的受容状况及杨万里在日本汉诗界的地位。
As for attention to Yang Wanli,Japanese poetic criticism mainly focuses on his artistic skills and poetic ideas,has a clear understanding of Yang Wanli's artistic style of being " pure and fresh" and " sharp and clever". While praising his poetic excellence,they also probe into his poetic drawbacks of being rash,have a twofold consideration about his poetic style of being " shallow and vulgar" and his poetic ideas of " being inspired at sight of things". From their discussion of Yang Wanli's poetic skills,interpretation of his poems,quotes and evaluation,wide citation of his poetic theories,comments,high praise of his poems and imitation writing,we can have a glimpse of Japanese poetic circle's acceptance of Yang Wanli and his status in Japanese poetic circle.
As for attention to Yang Wanli,Japanese poetic criticism mainly focuses on his artistic skills and poetic ideas,has a clear understanding of Yang Wanli's artistic style of being " pure and fresh" and " sharp and clever". While praising his poetic excellence,they also probe into his poetic drawbacks of being rash,have a twofold consideration about his poetic style of being " shallow and vulgar" and his poetic ideas of " being inspired at sight of things". From their discussion of Yang Wanli's poetic skills,interpretation of his poems,quotes and evaluation,wide citation of his poetic theories,comments,high praise of his poems and imitation writing,we can have a glimpse of Japanese poetic circle's acceptance of Yang Wanli and his status in Japanese poetic circle.
引文
[1]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷2[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[2]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷1[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[3]杨万里.杨万里集笺校[M].辛更儒,笺校.北京:中华书局,2007.
[4]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷9[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[5]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷5[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[6]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷6[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[7]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷10[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[8]纪昀.文渊阁四库全书:第1190册[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989:35.
[9]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷3[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[10]吴文治.辽金元诗话全编[M].南京:凤凰出版社,2006:2452.
[11]吉川幸次郎.宋诗概说[M].台北:联经出版事业公司,2012:223.
[12]孙立.日本诗话中的中国古代诗格研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:53.
(1)此处“问”应为“闹”,参见杨万里撰、辛更儒笺校《杨万里集笺校》第5册,第2160页,中华书局,2007年版。
[2]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷1[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[3]杨万里.杨万里集笺校[M].辛更儒,笺校.北京:中华书局,2007.
[4]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷9[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[5]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷5[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[6]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷6[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[7]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷10[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[8]纪昀.文渊阁四库全书:第1190册[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989:35.
[9]池田四郎次郎.日本诗话丛书:卷3[M].东京:东京文会堂书店,1919.
[10]吴文治.辽金元诗话全编[M].南京:凤凰出版社,2006:2452.
[11]吉川幸次郎.宋诗概说[M].台北:联经出版事业公司,2012:223.
[12]孙立.日本诗话中的中国古代诗格研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:53.
(1)此处“问”应为“闹”,参见杨万里撰、辛更儒笺校《杨万里集笺校》第5册,第2160页,中华书局,2007年版。