摘要
目的比较沪陕两地综合利用传染病信息资源的程度,分析其与传染病发病率间的相关性。方法从信息的收集、利用和共享三个方面计算综合利用传染病信息资源的程度,使用Spearman相关等方法分析其与传染病发病率间的关系。结果 2000-2017年,上海市综合利用传染病信息资源的程度从9. 4%提升到49. 8%,陕西省则从0提升到40. 1%;沪陕两地综合利用信息资源的程度与传染病发病率之间均呈负相关性(上海市相关系数=-0. 847,P <0. 001;陕西省相关系数=-0. 698,P <0. 01);上海市综合利用传染病信息资源的程度对传染病发病率变化的解释程度为69. 1%(R2=0. 691,P <0. 001);陕西省没有显著性影响(P> 0. 05)。结论沪陕综合利用传染病信息资源的水平均不断提升,且上海市略高于陕西省;上海市传染病信息资源的综合利用对传染病防治工作的支撑作用要优于陕西省;沪陕两地应继续努力提升信息利用和信息共享能力,提高信息资源的综合利用水平。
Objective To compare the levels of comprehensive utilization of information resources of infectious diseases in Shanghai and Shaanxi Province,and to analyze the relationship between the comprehensive utilization of information resources and the incidence of infectious diseases. Methods The comprehensive utilization of information resources of infectious diseases was calculated from the three aspects including information collection,utilization and sharing,and the relationship between the comprehensive utilization of information resources and the incidence of infectious diseases was analyzed by Spearman correlation,linear regression and other methods. Results From 2000 to 2017,the level of comprehensive utilization of infectious disease information resources in Shanghai increased from 9. 4% to 49. 8%,and that of Shaanxi Province increased from 0 to 40. 1%.There was a significant negative correlation between the level of comprehensive utilization of information resources and the incidence of infectious diseases both in Shanghai and Shaanxi Province; the correlation coefficients of Shanghai and Shaanxi Province were-0. 847 and-0. 698,respectively( both P < 0. 01). The interpretation degree of the comprehensive utilization of information resources on the change in the incidence of infectious diseases in Shanghai was 69. 1%( R2 = 0. 691,P < 0. 001),while there was no significant effect in Shaanxi Province( P> 0. 05). Conclusions The levels of the comprehensive utilization of infectious disease information resources in Shanghai and Shaanxi Province have been continuously improved,and the level of Shanghai is slightly higher than that of Shaanxi Province. The comprehensive utilization of information resources has played a supporting role in infectious disease work in Shanghai,but the role played by Shaanxi is not as good as Shanghai. Efforts should be continuously made in Shanghai and Shaanxi Province to improve the capability of information utilization and information sharing to further promote the comprehensive utilization of information resources.
引文
[1]马家奇.国家疾病网络直报系统与医院信息系统连接的公共卫生意义[J].中华预防医学杂志,2008,42(z1):108-109.
[2]马家奇.医改信息化公共卫生信息系统建设与应用[J].中国卫生信息管理杂志,2011,8(3):19-21.
[3]马伟,徐王权,何斌.探讨我国卫生资源利用中的问题与对策[J].中国科技信息,2008(21):227-229.
[4]范继红.关于公共卫生监督信息资源开发与利用的思考[J].湖北预防医学杂志,2004(4):79.
[5]江涛,李莉,曹彦.基于公共卫生信息平台交换传染病数据的研究[J].中国卫生信息管理杂志,2017,14(4):598-602.
[6]金水高.我国公共卫生信息化发展概览[J].中国医疗器械信息,2010,16(3):9-18,36.
[7]崔燕,王瑞,周艳冰,等.上海市普陀区医院信息系统在传染病信息报告与管理中的利用现况[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(24):1-2.
[8]张业武,赵自雄,郭岩,等.中国疾病预防控制机构应用系统建设、信息管理和服务现状分析[J].医学信息学杂志,2012,33(4):17-20,44.
[9]上海市卫生和计划生育委员会.上海市卫生计生数据[EB/OL].[2018-12-04].http://www.wsjsw.gov.cn/wsj/n429/n432/n1488/n1490/index.html.
[10]陕西省统计局.陕西统计数据库[EB/OL].[2018-12-04].http://tjsjk.shaanxitj.gov.cn:7001/multidimensionalquery Index.do.
[11]上海市加强公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划课题组.《上海现代化国际大都市公共卫生绩效体系构建》结题报告[R].上海,2018.
[12]郝模,李程跃,于明珠,等.新时代公共卫生体系的思考与研究[J].上海预防医学,2017,29(12):905-910.
[13]陶莹,李程跃,于明珠,等.公共卫生体系要素的确认与研究[J].中国卫生资源,2018,21(3):207-213.
[14]胡玫,卢福昱,董时军.传染病信息资源的收集与利用[J].预防医学情报杂志,2013,29(5):424-427.
[15]郝模等.卫生政策学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.
[16]Ellencweig AY.Analyzing Health Systems:A Modular Approach[M].London:Oxford University Press,1992.
[17]沈锋.上海公共卫生信息管理的问题及对策研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2007.
[18]薛秦香,马吏,戴民霞,等.陕西省公共卫生信息系统数据整合和使用[J].中国卫生资源,2007,10(4):202-204.
[19]马家奇.论公共卫生信息资源规划与管理[J].中国公共卫生管理,2008,24(3):323-324.