国际投资仲裁中的法律适用问题
|
摘要
因投资仲裁具有处理"条约请求"与"合同请求"双重诉因之特点,其法律适用问题体现为一定的多重性与复杂性。本文主要讨论国际投资仲裁中适用于程序事项和实体争议的各类法律涉及的具体问题,重点论述国际法与东道国法的适用原则、适用范围、实际效果以及两者的适用关系等,并特别讨论国家合同的法律适用与投资协定适用中的解释问题。
Since investment arbitration is in nature dealing with dual cause of actions as both treaty claim and contract claim. The issues of its application of laws are reflected with certain diversity and complexity. This article mainly discusses concrete issues relating to variety of governing laws applying to procedure matters and substantive disputes in international investment arbitration, which focuses on demonstrating the principle, scope and effect of the application of international law and domestic law, and the relation between application of the two legal systems.Meanwhile, applicable law of state contract and construction of BIT applying are also discussed.
Since investment arbitration is in nature dealing with dual cause of actions as both treaty claim and contract claim. The issues of its application of laws are reflected with certain diversity and complexity. This article mainly discusses concrete issues relating to variety of governing laws applying to procedure matters and substantive disputes in international investment arbitration, which focuses on demonstrating the principle, scope and effect of the application of international law and domestic law, and the relation between application of the two legal systems.Meanwhile, applicable law of state contract and construction of BIT applying are also discussed.
引文
(1)即“任何仲裁程序应依照本节规定,以及除双方另有协议外,依照双方同意提交仲裁之日有效的仲裁规则进行。如发生任何本节或仲裁规则或双方同意的任何规则未作规定的程序问题,则该问题应由仲裁庭决定”。
(2)主要指各种有关承认和执行仲裁裁决的公约和条约,尤其是1958年《纽约公约》。
(1)UK-Argintina BIT,art.8(4).
(1)Generation Ukraine,Inc.v Ukraine,ICSID Case No.ARB/00/9,Award,September 16,2003.
(2)Mitchell v.Conger(ICSID Case No.ARB/99/7),Annulment Decision,Nov.1,2006.
(1)CMS Gas Transmission Co.v.Argentina(Decision on Annulment)ICSID Case No.ARB/01/8.
(2)Compania de Aguas del Aconquija S.A.&Vivendi Universal S.A.v.Argentine Republic,ICSID Case No.ARB/97/3,Decision on Annulment,July 3,2002.
(1)Wena Hotels Ltd v.Arab Republic of Egypt,ICSID Case No.ARB/98/4,Annulment Decision,February 5,2002.
(2)Asia Agricultural Products Ltd(AAPL)v.Republic of Sri Lanka,ICSID Case No.ARB/87/3,Final Award,June27,1990.
(3)Compania del Desarrollo de Santa Elena SA v.Republic of Costa Rica,ICSID Case No.ARB/96/1,Final Award,February 17,2000.
(1)Amco Asia Corporation v.Republic of Indonesia,ICSID Case No.ARB/81/1.
(2)AGIP SaP v.Republic of Congo,ICSID Case No.ARB/77/1.
(3)Asia Agriculture Products Limited v.Republic of Sri Lanka,ICSID Case No.ARB/87/3.
(1)Broches,A.Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States of1965:Explanatory Notes and Survey of Its Application,18 YB Comm ARB 627(1993).
(2)Amco Asia Corporation and Others v.Republic of Indonesia,ICSID Case No.ARB/81/1),Annulment Decision May16,1986.
(3)Southern Pacific Properties v.Arab Republic of Egpty,ICSID Case No.ARB/84/3,Final Award,May 20,1992.
(4)Liberian Eastern Timber Corporation v.Republic of Liberia,ICSID Case No.ARB/83/2,Final Award,March 31,1986.
(5)Peter,M.F.,et al.The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law[M].Oxford University Press,2008:105.
(1)Klockner Industry v.United Republic of Cameroon,ICSID Case No.ABB/81/2,Final Award,October 21,1983.
(2)Klockner Industry v.United Republic of Cameroon,ICSID Case No.ABB/81/2,Annulment Dcision,May 3,1985.
(3)Ortino,Peter M.F.Schreuer,Christoph.The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law[M].Oxford University Press,2008:111~112,115.
(1)Ortino,Peter M.F.Schreuer,Christoph.The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law[M].Oxford University Press,2008:113.
(2)Mclachlan,Campbell,et al.International Investment Arbitration:Substantive Principle[M].Oxford University Press,2017:189.
(3)Mclachlan,Campbell,et al.International Investment Arbitration:Substantive Principle[M].Oxford University Press,2017:102.
(4)Maritime International Nominees Establishment v.Republic of Guinea,ICSID Case No.ARB/84/4.
(1)Guas del Tunari v.Bolivia,ICSID Case No.ARB/02/3.
(2)AES Corp v.Argentina,ICSID Case No.ARB/02/17.
(1)Amco Asia Corporation and Others v.Republic of Indonesia,ICSID Case No.ARB/81/1;Klockner Industry v.United Republic of Cameroon,ICSID Case No.ABB/81/2.
(2)主要指各种有关承认和执行仲裁裁决的公约和条约,尤其是1958年《纽约公约》。
(1)UK-Argintina BIT,art.8(4).
(1)Generation Ukraine,Inc.v Ukraine,ICSID Case No.ARB/00/9,Award,September 16,2003.
(2)Mitchell v.Conger(ICSID Case No.ARB/99/7),Annulment Decision,Nov.1,2006.
(1)CMS Gas Transmission Co.v.Argentina(Decision on Annulment)ICSID Case No.ARB/01/8.
(2)Compania de Aguas del Aconquija S.A.&Vivendi Universal S.A.v.Argentine Republic,ICSID Case No.ARB/97/3,Decision on Annulment,July 3,2002.
(1)Wena Hotels Ltd v.Arab Republic of Egypt,ICSID Case No.ARB/98/4,Annulment Decision,February 5,2002.
(2)Asia Agricultural Products Ltd(AAPL)v.Republic of Sri Lanka,ICSID Case No.ARB/87/3,Final Award,June27,1990.
(3)Compania del Desarrollo de Santa Elena SA v.Republic of Costa Rica,ICSID Case No.ARB/96/1,Final Award,February 17,2000.
(1)Amco Asia Corporation v.Republic of Indonesia,ICSID Case No.ARB/81/1.
(2)AGIP SaP v.Republic of Congo,ICSID Case No.ARB/77/1.
(3)Asia Agriculture Products Limited v.Republic of Sri Lanka,ICSID Case No.ARB/87/3.
(1)Broches,A.Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States of1965:Explanatory Notes and Survey of Its Application,18 YB Comm ARB 627(1993).
(2)Amco Asia Corporation and Others v.Republic of Indonesia,ICSID Case No.ARB/81/1),Annulment Decision May16,1986.
(3)Southern Pacific Properties v.Arab Republic of Egpty,ICSID Case No.ARB/84/3,Final Award,May 20,1992.
(4)Liberian Eastern Timber Corporation v.Republic of Liberia,ICSID Case No.ARB/83/2,Final Award,March 31,1986.
(5)Peter,M.F.,et al.The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law[M].Oxford University Press,2008:105.
(1)Klockner Industry v.United Republic of Cameroon,ICSID Case No.ABB/81/2,Final Award,October 21,1983.
(2)Klockner Industry v.United Republic of Cameroon,ICSID Case No.ABB/81/2,Annulment Dcision,May 3,1985.
(3)Ortino,Peter M.F.Schreuer,Christoph.The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law[M].Oxford University Press,2008:111~112,115.
(1)Ortino,Peter M.F.Schreuer,Christoph.The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law[M].Oxford University Press,2008:113.
(2)Mclachlan,Campbell,et al.International Investment Arbitration:Substantive Principle[M].Oxford University Press,2017:189.
(3)Mclachlan,Campbell,et al.International Investment Arbitration:Substantive Principle[M].Oxford University Press,2017:102.
(4)Maritime International Nominees Establishment v.Republic of Guinea,ICSID Case No.ARB/84/4.
(1)Guas del Tunari v.Bolivia,ICSID Case No.ARB/02/3.
(2)AES Corp v.Argentina,ICSID Case No.ARB/02/17.
(1)Amco Asia Corporation and Others v.Republic of Indonesia,ICSID Case No.ARB/81/1;Klockner Industry v.United Republic of Cameroon,ICSID Case No.ABB/81/2.