网络公益创新的价值偏失与纠治
|
摘要
近年来,公益工具创新展现出了巨大的可能性,但网络公益危机事件频发,公众对网络公益发展价值缺失表现出越来越大的担忧。从工具理性、价值理性的角度来分析,网络公益创新具有明显的理性缺陷。学界提出了实质理性,以调和价值理性和工具理性的矛盾。网络公益创新应当充分发挥实质理性,在网络公益创新发展中融合工具理性和价值理性,做到在实质上凝结社会公益共识、弘扬公益价值,形成公益文化共识,建立健康公益文化共同体,促进公益健康持续发展。
In recent years,the innovation of commonweal tools has shown great possibilities,but network commonweal crisis incidents occur frequently,and the public shows growing concern about the lack of value of the development of network commonweal. From the perspective of instrumental rationality and value rationality,network commonweal innovation has obvious rational defects. The academics put forward substantive rationality to reconcile the contradiction between value rationality and instrumental rationality. Network commonweal innovation should give full play to the substantive rationality. In the development of network public welfare innovation,tool rationality and value rationality should be integrated,so as to condense social public welfare consensus,promote public welfare value,form public welfare cultural consensus,establish a healthy public welfare cultural community, and to promote the healthy and sustainable development of public welfare.
In recent years,the innovation of commonweal tools has shown great possibilities,but network commonweal crisis incidents occur frequently,and the public shows growing concern about the lack of value of the development of network commonweal. From the perspective of instrumental rationality and value rationality,network commonweal innovation has obvious rational defects. The academics put forward substantive rationality to reconcile the contradiction between value rationality and instrumental rationality. Network commonweal innovation should give full play to the substantive rationality. In the development of network public welfare innovation,tool rationality and value rationality should be integrated,so as to condense social public welfare consensus,promote public welfare value,form public welfare cultural consensus,establish a healthy public welfare cultural community, and to promote the healthy and sustainable development of public welfare.
引文
[1][2][3][6][9]马克斯·韦伯.社会学的基本概念[M].广西:广西师范大学出版社,2005. 31; 32; 44.
[4]尼古拉斯.亨利.张昕等译.公共行政与公共事务[M].中国人民大学出版社,2002. 139.
[5]钟祥财.经济思想史上对价值理性的工具性解释[J].学术月刊,2011(2).
[7]詹姆斯C斯科特.王晓毅译.国家的视角[M].社会科学文献出版社,2004. 127.
[8]孟凡民.公共决策中的理性:价值问题研究[J].中国行政管理,2006(7).
[10]陈宝生.把握改革总目标深化国家治理现代化研究[J].国家行政学院学报,2014(4):4-7.
[11]杨团.专家详解区分个人求助与慈善募捐[N].法制日报,2017. 8. 18.
[12]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:37.
[13]习近平.习近平在浙江慈善大会上强调齐心协力发展慈善事业同心同德建设和谐社[N].浙江日报,2006. 12. 13.
[14]吕鑫.法律中的慈善[J].清华法学,2016. 6.
[4]尼古拉斯.亨利.张昕等译.公共行政与公共事务[M].中国人民大学出版社,2002. 139.
[5]钟祥财.经济思想史上对价值理性的工具性解释[J].学术月刊,2011(2).
[7]詹姆斯C斯科特.王晓毅译.国家的视角[M].社会科学文献出版社,2004. 127.
[8]孟凡民.公共决策中的理性:价值问题研究[J].中国行政管理,2006(7).
[10]陈宝生.把握改革总目标深化国家治理现代化研究[J].国家行政学院学报,2014(4):4-7.
[11]杨团.专家详解区分个人求助与慈善募捐[N].法制日报,2017. 8. 18.
[12]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:37.
[13]习近平.习近平在浙江慈善大会上强调齐心协力发展慈善事业同心同德建设和谐社[N].浙江日报,2006. 12. 13.
[14]吕鑫.法律中的慈善[J].清华法学,2016. 6.