印度《司法规范与责任法案》述评及对我国的启示
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Commentary on India Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill and Enlightenments to China
  • 作者:乔一涓 ; 熊则凯
  • 英文作者:QIAO Yi-juan;XIONG Ze-kai;Hunan Normal University Law School;Hunan Yueling Law Firm;
  • 关键词:印度 ; 司法改革 ; 司法责任制 ; 法官惩戒
  • 英文关键词:India;;judicial revolution;;judicial accountability;;judge discipline
  • 中文刊名:HNZF
  • 英文刊名:Presentday Law Science
  • 机构:湖南师范大学法学院;湖南悦凌律师事务所;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-20
  • 出版单位:时代法学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.17;No.93
  • 基金:湖南省重点学科建设项目(湘发[2011]76号)资助;; 第57批中国博士后基金面上资助(项目编号2015M572249)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HNZF201901013
  • 页数:7
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:43-1431/D
  • 分类号:117-123
摘要
2010年印度《司法规范与责任法案(草案)》是各国司法改革浪潮中具有里程碑意义的代表性立法。法案对法官行为实体规范、法官调查的程序规范、调查程序的保障机制和法官财产公示制度有详尽的规定,具有统一性、分权性和专业性的特征。在获得好评的同时,司法独立和司法责任之间的固有矛盾、透明性和程序公正问题日益凸显。这让我们清楚认识到:我国特有的司法独立是构建司法责任制的重要前提;完善法官问责程序是落实司法责任制的关键问题;加强法官权利保障是完善司法责任制的前提条件。
        2010 Indian Judicial Standards and Accountability Billis is the milestone of legislation on judicial accountability in the tide of judicial revolution. The Bill has elaborated judicial conducts,inquiry procedure of judges,other procedures relating to inquiry,and declaration of assets and liability by Judges. The Bill is characterized by uniformity,separation of powers and specialization. Good comments come to the Bill as well as the conflicts between judicial independence and judicial accountability,and problems on transparency and fairness of procedure. The enlightenment for Chinese judicial accountability such as the particular judicial independence is the vital precondition of judicial accountability,the improvement of judges' accountability is the key issue of judicial accountability,and the enhancement of judges' rights protection is the condition of judicial accountability.
引文
[1]N.R.Madhava Menon,Law and Justice:A Look at the Role and Performance of Indian Judiciary[Z],Address delivered at the Berkeley Seminar Series on Law and Democracy held at University of California,2008.
    [2]CJI A.S.Anand:Indian Judiciary and Challenges of 21st century[J],The Indian Journal of PublicA dministration,1999,Vol.XIV,No.3:300.
    [3]Vandana Ajay Kumar,Judicial Delays in India:Cause&Remedies[J],Journal of Law,Policy and Globalization,2012,Vol.4:16-21.
    [4]Prashant Bhushan,The Lack of Judicial Accountability in India[Z],Talk delivered at Princeton University at the Department of South Asian Studies,2009.
    [5]James Andrew Wynn,Judging the Judges[J],Marquette Law Review,2003,Vol.86,Issue 4.
    [6]Dr.Bhre Lal,Judicial Activism&Accountability[M],India:Siddharth Publications,2004:27-151.
    [7]A Saxena,Judicial accountability bill-Need and consequences[EB/OL].(2014-03-01)[2018-07-07].http://indianbarassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Judicial-Accountability-Bill-Need-and-Consequences.pdf.
    [8]Pankhuri Agrawal,Judicial Independence and Accountbility:In View of the Case of J.Soumitra Sen[EB/OL].[2018-07-07].http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1965200.
    [9]姚莉,杨帆.法官自治、自律与司法公正[J].法学评论,1999,(4).
    [10]Discuss,Debate and Deliberate Summary of Discussio in Academic Block-I“The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill,2010:Need,Significance and Drawbacks”[EB/OL].(2013-09-04)[2018-07-07].https://www.nliu.ac.in/manthan/firsttrim/nliu_manthan-6_the_judicial_standards.pdf.
    [11]陈光中.比较法视野下中国特色司法独立原则[J].比较法研究,2013,(2).
    [12]PRS India.Final Brief for printing-Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill 2010[EB/OL].(2015-09-09)[2018-07-07].http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Judicial%20Standard/Final%20Brief%20for%20printing%20-%20Judicial%20Standards%20and%20Accountability%20Bill%202010.pdf.
    [13]Isha Tirkey,Judicial Accountability in India[Z],CCS Working Paper,No.247,2011.
    [14]Discuss,Debate and Deliberate Summary of Discussion Academic Block-I“The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill,2010:Need,Significance and Drawbacks”[EB/OL].(2013-09-04)[2018-07-07].https://www.nliu.ac.in/manthan/firsttrim/nliu_manthan-6_the_judicial_standards.pdf.
    [15]Pankhuri Agrawal,Judicial Independence and Accountability in the View of the Case in J.Soumitra Sen[EB/OL].[2018-07-07].http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1965200.
    [16]卫建萍.上海法官检察官遴选(惩戒)委员会成立[N/OL].人民法院报,(2014-12-14)[2018-07-07].https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2014/12/id/1506380.shtml.
    [17]陈卫东.司法机关依法独立行使职权研究[J].中国法学,2014,(2).
    [18]陈瑞华.法官责任的三种模式[J].法学研究,2015,(4).
    [19]傅郁林.司法责任制的重心是职责界分[J].中国法律评论,2015,(4).
    [20]王迎龙.构建司法化的法官责任追究程序[J].政法论坛,2016,34(5):39.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700