亚投行投资争端解决机制研究——基于对亚投行投资创新模式的思考
|
摘要
亚投行的投资发展规模不断壮大,与此同时也面临现有金融体系的约束、与现有多边金融机构存在业务竞争、地缘政治等问题。对此,亚投行应该实行多元化投资、通过下设国际金融公司的方式发展私营模式、在联合融资的基础上发展壮大独立融资项目。另外,投资发展必然面临投资争端,但现有的投资争端解决机制受美国等发达国家干预、透明度不高、争端双方利益不平衡、仲裁裁决存在不确定性等问题,也与亚投行的投资发展不匹配。对此,应依托亚投行建立亚投行投资争端解决机制,在建立时应制定完善的规则体系、符合亚投行的投资特点、构建与我国国内仲裁实践相互配合的新模式。
The investment of AIIB keeps growing in scale, but at the same time, facing constraints of the existing financial system, business competition with existing multilateral financial institutions and geopolitical issues, the AIIB should diversify its investment, develop a private model through an international financial corporation, and grow independent financing projects on the basis of joint financing. In addition, investment development is bound to face investment disputes, but due to intervention by the United States and other developed countries, existing settlement mechanism of investment dispute suffers low transparency, uneven interests of both parties in disputes, and uncertainty of arbitration, which make it unmatched with the investment development of AIIB. In this regard, it is necessary for us to establish settlement mechanism of investment dispute relying on the AIIB, and develop a sound rule system in line with the investment characteristics of the AIIB and a new model of cooperation with China's domestic arbitration practice.
The investment of AIIB keeps growing in scale, but at the same time, facing constraints of the existing financial system, business competition with existing multilateral financial institutions and geopolitical issues, the AIIB should diversify its investment, develop a private model through an international financial corporation, and grow independent financing projects on the basis of joint financing. In addition, investment development is bound to face investment disputes, but due to intervention by the United States and other developed countries, existing settlement mechanism of investment dispute suffers low transparency, uneven interests of both parties in disputes, and uncertainty of arbitration, which make it unmatched with the investment development of AIIB. In this regard, it is necessary for us to establish settlement mechanism of investment dispute relying on the AIIB, and develop a sound rule system in line with the investment characteristics of the AIIB and a new model of cooperation with China's domestic arbitration practice.
引文
[1] 谢世清,胡东.亚投行的国际挑战与应对策略[J].亚太经济,2017(1):41-45,174.
[2] 杨靖三.亚投行融资理念与世界金融体系变革[J].上海金融,2016(7):80-82.
[3] 刘东民,李远芳,熊爱宗,等.亚投行的战略定位与业务创新模式[J].国际经济评论,2017(5):149-166,8.
[4] 顾宾,刘英.亚投行投资项目的六大特点[N].云南经济日报,2018-01-29(03).
[5] 余劲松.国际投资法[M].北京:法律出版社,2014:344-345,371-372.
[6] 马亚伟,漆彤.论“一带一路”投资争议解决机制的构建[J].国际商务研究,2018(5):85-96.
[7] PARRA A R.Provisions on the Settlement of Investment Disputes in Modern Investment Laws[J].Bilateral Investment Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investments ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal,1997,12(1):352.
[8] FRANCK S D.The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration:Privatizing Public International Law through Inconsistent Decisions[J].Fordham Law Review,2005,73(4):1521.
[9] 詹晓宁.世界投资报告[M].冼国明,葛顺奇,等,译.天津:南开大学出版社,2015:158.
[10] SALDARRIAGA A.Investment Awards and the Rules of Interpretation of the Vienna Convention:Making Room for Improvement[J].Manchester Journal of International Economic Law,2013,10(2):165-186.
[11] SONARAJAH M.Mutations of Neo-Liberalism in International Investment Law[J].Trade,Law and Development,2011,3(1):203-232.
[12] 黄世席.国际投资仲裁裁决执行中的国家豁免问题[J].清华法学,2012(6):95-106.
[13] 漆彤.论亚投行对全球金融治理体系的完善[J].法学杂志,2016(6):13-21.
[14] FRANK S D.Foreign Direct Investment,Investment Treaty Arbitration,and the Rule of Law[J].Mc-George Global Business and Development Law Journal,2007,1(19):372.
[15] GANTZ D A.An Appellate Mechanism for Review of Arbitration Decisions in Investor-State Disputes:Prospects and Challenges[J].Vanderbill Journal of Transnational Law,2006,39(1):39-76.
[2] 杨靖三.亚投行融资理念与世界金融体系变革[J].上海金融,2016(7):80-82.
[3] 刘东民,李远芳,熊爱宗,等.亚投行的战略定位与业务创新模式[J].国际经济评论,2017(5):149-166,8.
[4] 顾宾,刘英.亚投行投资项目的六大特点[N].云南经济日报,2018-01-29(03).
[5] 余劲松.国际投资法[M].北京:法律出版社,2014:344-345,371-372.
[6] 马亚伟,漆彤.论“一带一路”投资争议解决机制的构建[J].国际商务研究,2018(5):85-96.
[7] PARRA A R.Provisions on the Settlement of Investment Disputes in Modern Investment Laws[J].Bilateral Investment Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investments ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal,1997,12(1):352.
[8] FRANCK S D.The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration:Privatizing Public International Law through Inconsistent Decisions[J].Fordham Law Review,2005,73(4):1521.
[9] 詹晓宁.世界投资报告[M].冼国明,葛顺奇,等,译.天津:南开大学出版社,2015:158.
[10] SALDARRIAGA A.Investment Awards and the Rules of Interpretation of the Vienna Convention:Making Room for Improvement[J].Manchester Journal of International Economic Law,2013,10(2):165-186.
[11] SONARAJAH M.Mutations of Neo-Liberalism in International Investment Law[J].Trade,Law and Development,2011,3(1):203-232.
[12] 黄世席.国际投资仲裁裁决执行中的国家豁免问题[J].清华法学,2012(6):95-106.
[13] 漆彤.论亚投行对全球金融治理体系的完善[J].法学杂志,2016(6):13-21.
[14] FRANK S D.Foreign Direct Investment,Investment Treaty Arbitration,and the Rule of Law[J].Mc-George Global Business and Development Law Journal,2007,1(19):372.
[15] GANTZ D A.An Appellate Mechanism for Review of Arbitration Decisions in Investor-State Disputes:Prospects and Challenges[J].Vanderbill Journal of Transnational Law,2006,39(1):39-76.