中国区域农业技术进步偏向与要素结构匹配研究
|
摘要
本文在诱致性技术创新理论框架下,采用超越对数生产函数方法,运用1995—2012年全国各省市相关数据,对全国及不同区域农业技术进步偏向进行测算,并结合地方资源禀赋特征对不同区域农业技术进步模式做了一定评价。结果显示:从全国层面看,农业技术进步呈现劳动节约型,这并不符合诱致性创新理论下中国应有的技术进步方向。分区域看,相对于中部地区,东、西部地区技术进步方向有悖于劳动力资源比较优势特征;相比于主销区和平衡区,主产区农业劳动力的相对稀缺则部分支持了主产区劳动节约型技术进步的选择。
In the theoretical framework of Induced Technological Innovation Theory,trans-log production function panel date econometric method is used in this paper to calculate the agricultural biased technological progress of the entire country and its different regions from 1995 to 2012,and then some evaluation on different regional agricultural technological progress patterns is made combined with the local resource endowment characteristics. The conclusion shows that agricultural technological progress pattern in national level is a labor-saving one,which does not comply with the direction of technological progress in induced innovation theory. Compared with the central region,the direction of technological progress in the eastern and western regions is contrary to the comparative advantage characteristics of labor resources. Compared with the grain selling areas and sales balance areas,the relative scarcity of agricultural labor ingrain producing areas may partly explain why its agricultural technological progress pattern is a labor-saving one.
In the theoretical framework of Induced Technological Innovation Theory,trans-log production function panel date econometric method is used in this paper to calculate the agricultural biased technological progress of the entire country and its different regions from 1995 to 2012,and then some evaluation on different regional agricultural technological progress patterns is made combined with the local resource endowment characteristics. The conclusion shows that agricultural technological progress pattern in national level is a labor-saving one,which does not comply with the direction of technological progress in induced innovation theory. Compared with the central region,the direction of technological progress in the eastern and western regions is contrary to the comparative advantage characteristics of labor resources. Compared with the grain selling areas and sales balance areas,the relative scarcity of agricultural labor ingrain producing areas may partly explain why its agricultural technological progress pattern is a labor-saving one.
引文
[1]高帆.中国区域农业全要素生产率的演变趋势与影响因素——基于省级面板数据的实证分析[J].数量经济与技术经济研究,2015(5):3-19,53.
[2]林毅夫,潘士远.技术进步越快越好吗[J].中国工业经济,2005(10):5-11.
[3]林毅夫.制度、技术与中国农业发展[M].上海:格致出版社、上海人民出版社,2008:145-166.
[4]袁江,张成思.强制性技术变迁、不平衡增长与中国经济周期模型[J].经济研究,2009(12):17-29.
[5]吴敬学.农业技术进步模式问题研究[J].世界农业,1997(3):12-13;43.
[6]王永龙.论中国农业技术进步路线的选择[J].当代经济研究,2002(7):46-49.
[7]胡瑞法.农业生产投入要素结构变化与农业技术发展方向[J].中国农村观察,2002(6):9-16.
[8]姜鑫.诱致性农业技术创新模型及中国农业技术变革的实证研究[J].财经论丛,2007(3):1-7.
[9]杨巍,吴敬学,张扬.早稻生产技术进步模式的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(20):66-69.
[10]张月玲,叶阿忠.中国区域技术选择与要素结构匹配差异:1996—2010[J].财经研究,2013(12):100-113.
[11]王灿雄,谢志忠.论超越对数生产函数要素替代弹性的逻辑错误[J].统计与信息论坛,2013(28):13-16.
[12]张海鑫,杨钢桥.耕地细碎化及其对粮食生产技术效率的影响[J].资源科学,2012,35(5):903-910.
[13]陈宗胜.增长方式转型与技术进步及劳动密集技术的选择[J].管理世界,1996(3):33-38.
[14]朱喜,史清华,盖庆恩.要素配置扭曲与农业全要素生产率[J].经济研究,2011(5):86-98.
[2]林毅夫,潘士远.技术进步越快越好吗[J].中国工业经济,2005(10):5-11.
[3]林毅夫.制度、技术与中国农业发展[M].上海:格致出版社、上海人民出版社,2008:145-166.
[4]袁江,张成思.强制性技术变迁、不平衡增长与中国经济周期模型[J].经济研究,2009(12):17-29.
[5]吴敬学.农业技术进步模式问题研究[J].世界农业,1997(3):12-13;43.
[6]王永龙.论中国农业技术进步路线的选择[J].当代经济研究,2002(7):46-49.
[7]胡瑞法.农业生产投入要素结构变化与农业技术发展方向[J].中国农村观察,2002(6):9-16.
[8]姜鑫.诱致性农业技术创新模型及中国农业技术变革的实证研究[J].财经论丛,2007(3):1-7.
[9]杨巍,吴敬学,张扬.早稻生产技术进步模式的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(20):66-69.
[10]张月玲,叶阿忠.中国区域技术选择与要素结构匹配差异:1996—2010[J].财经研究,2013(12):100-113.
[11]王灿雄,谢志忠.论超越对数生产函数要素替代弹性的逻辑错误[J].统计与信息论坛,2013(28):13-16.
[12]张海鑫,杨钢桥.耕地细碎化及其对粮食生产技术效率的影响[J].资源科学,2012,35(5):903-910.
[13]陈宗胜.增长方式转型与技术进步及劳动密集技术的选择[J].管理世界,1996(3):33-38.
[14]朱喜,史清华,盖庆恩.要素配置扭曲与农业全要素生产率[J].经济研究,2011(5):86-98.