有机认证制度下农户减量施肥意愿的影响因素分析——基于四川省1061户农民的调查
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis of factors affecting farmers’ intention to reduce fertilization under organic certification system
  • 作者:唐艳
  • 英文作者:TANG Yan;College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University;
  • 关键词:有机农业 ; 计划行为理论 ; 化肥使用 ; 有机认证制度
  • 英文关键词:organic agriculture;;theory of planned behavior;;applying fertilizer;;organic certification system
  • 中文刊名:GHZH
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
  • 机构:四川大学建筑与环境学院/法学院生态环境损害研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-07-11
  • 出版单位:干旱区资源与环境
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.33;No.254
  • 基金:四川大学双一流专项研究项目(sculaw0515),四川大学专职博士后研发基金项目资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GHZH201910005
  • 页数:6
  • CN:10
  • ISSN:15-1112/N
  • 分类号:31-36
摘要
以行为理论为基础,探讨心理因素、农户特征和有机产品认证政策对农民施肥行为的影响。研究结果表明:在全部农户样本中,年龄、种植类型、政策约束对农户减量施肥意愿有显著的正向影响。但对于位于有机认证示范区和非有机认证示范区的农户,其减量施肥意愿的影响因素有所不同。在有机认证示范区的农户样本中,随着变量年龄(35-44岁)、心理变量感知资源、主观规范和感知行为控制的值增加一个单位,农户依据有机认证制度改变施肥行为的概率分别增加8.11%、1.35%、0.93%和0.81%。在非有机认证示范区的农户样本中,随着变量种植类型(园艺作物)、有机农业技术培训、年龄(35-44岁)、感知行为控制、态度和感知资源的值每增加一个单位,农户依据有机认证制度改变施肥行为的概率分别增加16.17%、12.31%、10.03%、7.04%、5.68%和5.54%。基于以上研究结果,提出了实施有机认证制度的建议。
        This study examines the influence of psychological factors, farmer characteristics and organic product certification policies on farmers' intention to apply fertilizer. An expanded version of the theory of planned behavior is used as a framework. The results for the all farmer' sample show that age, planting type and policy are significantly and positively associated with farmers' intentions. In terms of the farmers' sample which located in the organic certification demonstration area, as the level of the age, perceived resources, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control increase by one unit, the probability of a farmer applying fertilizer on the basis of organic certification policy increases by 8.11%,1.35%,0.93% and 0.81% level respectively. In terms of the farmers' sample which located in the other area, as the level of the planting type, organic agriculture technology training, age, perceived behavior control, attitude and perceive resource increase by one unit, the probability of farmer applying fertilizer on the basis of organic certification policy increases by 16.17%,12.31%,10.03%,7.04%,5.68% and 5.54% level respectively. Policy recommendations are made based on these results.
引文
[1] 栾江,仇焕广,井月,等.我国化肥施用量持续增长的原因分解及趋势预测[J].自然资源学报,2013,28(11):1869-1878.
    [2] 洪传春,刘某承,李文华.我国化肥投入面源污染控制政策评估[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(4):1-6.
    [3] 何浩然,张林秀,李强.农民施肥行为及农业面源污染研究[J].农业技术经济,2006(6):2-10.
    [4] Lu C,Tian H.Global nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer use for agriculture production in the past half century:shifted hot spots and nutrient imbalance[J].Earth System Science,2017,9(1):181-192.
    [5]田云,张俊飚,何可,等.农户农业低碳生产行为及其影响因素分析-以化肥施用和农药使用为例[J].中国农村观察,2015(4):61-70.
    [6] 王则宇,李谷成,周晓时.农业劳动力结构、粮食生产与化肥利用效率提升-基于随机前沿生产函数与Tobit模型的实证研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(2):158-168.
    [7] 诸培新,苏敏,颜杰.转入农地经营规模及稳定性对农户化肥投入的影响-以江苏四县(市)水稻生产为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(4):85-94.
    [8] 杨万江,李琪.稻农化肥减量施用行为的影响因素[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,16(3):58-66.
    [9] Timprasert S,Datta A,Ranamukhaarachchi S L.Factors determining adoption of integrated pest management by vegetable growers in Nakhon Ratchasima Province,Thailand[J].Crop Protect,2014,62:32-39.
    [10] 栾江,仇宏伟,赵静.中国农业生产中化肥过度使用状况及地域分布差异[J].青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,35(1):40-48.
    [11] 谯薇,云霞.我国有机农业发展:理论基础、现状及对策[J].农村经济,2016(2):20-24.
    [12] Ajzen I,Fishbein M.Attitude-behavior relations:a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research[J].Psychological Bulletin,1977,84(5):888-918.
    [13] Sheng T,Li E,Bruwer J,et al.A Structured assessment on the perceived attributes of sustainable agricultural practices:A study for the Malaysian vegetable production sector[J].Asian Journal of Technology Innovation,2013,21(1):120-135.
    [14] Rezaei R,Mianaji S,Ganjloo A.Factors affecting farmers’ intention to engage in on-farm food safety practices in Iran:extending the theory of planned behavior[J].Journal of Rural Study,2018,60:152-166.
    [15] Zeng Z,Cleon C B.Factors affecting the adoption of a land information system:an empirical analysis in Liberia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,73:353-362.
    [16] Lalani B,Dorward P,Holloway G,et al.Smallholder farmers’motivations for using Conservation Agriculture and the roles of yield,labor and soil fertility in decision making[J].Agriculture System,2016,146:80-90.
    [17] Schembri N,Hernandez-Jover M,Toribio J A,et al.Demographic and production practices of pig producers trading at saleyards in eastern Australia[J].Australian Veterinary Journal,2013,91(12):507-516.
    [18] Barnes A P,Willock J,Hall C,et al.Farmer perspectives and practices regarding water pollution control programme in Scotland[J].Agriculture Water Managagement,2009,96(12):1715-1722.
    [19] Barnes A P,Toma L,Willock J,et al.Comparing a "budge" to a "nudge":farmer responses to voluntary and compulsory compliance in a water quality management regime[J].Journal of Rural Study,2013,32:448-459.
    [20] Macgregor C J,Warren C R.Adopting sustainable farm management practices within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone in Scotland:the view from the farm[J].Agriculture Ecosystem Environment,2006,113(1-4):108-119.
    [21] Macgregor C J,Warren C R.Evaluating the impacts of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones on the environment and farmers’ practices:a Scottish case study[J].Scottish Geography Journal,2015,132(1):1-20.
    [22] Yiridoe E K,Atari D O A,Gordon R,et al.Factors influencing participation in the Nova Scotia environmental farm plan program[J].Land Use Policy,2010,27(4):1097-1106.
    [23] 彭海英,史正涛,刘新有,等.农作物种植结构与农民收入及其对环境影响的分析[J].环境科学与管理,2008(2):44-48.
    [24] Howley P,Buckley C,O’ Donoghue C,et al.Explaining the economic 'irrationality’ of farmers’ land use behavior:the role of productivity attitudes and non-pecuniary benefits[J].Ecology Economy,2015,109:186-193.
    [25] Burton R.Reconceptualising the ’behavioral approach’ in agricultural studies:a socio-psychological perspective[J].Journal of Rural Study,2004,20 (3):359-371.
    [26] Zhang W,Wilson R S,Burnett E,et al.What motivates farmers to apply phosphorus at the "right" time?Survey evidence from the Western Lake Erie Basin[J].Journal of Great Lakes Research,2016,42(6):1343-1356.
    [27] Borges J R,Tauer L W,Oude Lansink A.Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying Brazilian cattle farmers’ intention to use improved natural grassland:a MIMIC modelling approach[J].Land Use Policy,2016,55:193-203.
    [28] 徐卫涛,张俊飚,李树明,等.循环农业中的农户减量化投入行为分析-基于晋、鲁、鄂三省的化肥投入调查[J].资源科学,2010,32(12):2407-2412.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700