用户名: 密码: 验证码:
樟子松人工固沙林冠幅——胸径模型
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Canopy-DBH Models for Sand-fixing Plantation of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica
  • 作者:韩艳刚 ; 雷泽勇 ; 赵国军 ; 周晏平 ; 徐畅
  • 英文作者:HAN Yan-gang;LEI Ze-yong;ZHAO Guo-jun;ZHOU Yan-ping;XU Chang;College of Environmental Science and Engineering,Liaoning Technical University;Liaoning Province Institute for Sand-fixation and Afforestation Research;
  • 关键词:樟子松 ; 人工固沙林 ; 冠幅—胸径 ; 混合效应 ; 基础模型 ; 广义模型
  • 英文关键词:Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica;;sand-fixing plantation;;canopy-DBH;;mixed-effect basic model;;generalized model
  • 中文刊名:GHQJ
  • 英文刊名:Arid Zone Research
  • 机构:辽宁工程技术大学环境科学与工程学院;辽宁省固沙造林研究所;
  • 出版日期:2018-07-13 11:31
  • 出版单位:干旱区研究
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.35
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(31570709)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GHQJ201805016
  • 页数:9
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:65-1095/X
  • 分类号:132-140
摘要
基于章古台地区22块樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica)人工纯林标准地的702棵樟子松立木数据,构建了樟子松固沙林冠幅—胸径关系的基础模型、广义模型及基于混合效应的基础模型和广义模型;比较了随机选择样本木、选择平均胸径树、选胸径较小树和选胸径较大树4种方案,计算混合模型随机参数时的混合模型预测精度;最后分析了不同林木因子和林分变量对冠幅—胸径关系的影响。模型评价指标包括决定系数(R~2)、平均绝对误差(MAE)以及均方根误差(RMSE)。结果表明:枝下高(HCB)、相对植距(RS)和林龄(A)对冠幅—胸径关系影响最为显著;混合模型拟合精度(基础混合模型R~2、MAE和RMSE分别是0.703 0、0.386 6和0.515 4;广义混合模型R~2、MAE和RMSE为0.705 1、0.382 2和0.513 6)高于最小二乘法回归(OLS)模型(基础模型R~2、MAE和RMSE分别为0.587 5、0.469 6、0.607 5;广义模型R~2、MAE和RMSE分别为0.661 8、0.415 5和0.550 0)。基础混合模型和广义混合模型差异较小(2模型R~2、MAE和RMSE均相差1%左右)。冠幅随HCB和A的增大而减小,随RS的增大而增大。进行冠幅预测时,推荐使用基础混合模型并从每块标准地选择2棵平均木冠幅计算其随机参数,或使用方法较为简单的OLS广义模型预测单木冠幅大小。
        In this study,the data consisted of 702 individuals of Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica in 22 temporary sample plots of pure plantation in Zhanggutai of Liaoning Province,northeast China,were used to develop the canopy-DBH models,i.e.the basic model(fitted by ordinary least squares,OLS),generalized model(fitted by OLS),nonlinear mixed-effect basic model and nonlinear mixed-effect generalized model.The goodness-of-fits and prediction accuracy of the four models were compared.For the mixed-effect model,four sampling strategies,i.e.,random sampling,large-DBH tree sampling,small-DBH tree sampling and medium-DBH tree sampling,were designed to calculate the random parameters.The effects of individual factor and stand level variables on the canopy-DBH relationship were simulated.Model evaluation indices included the determination coefficient(R~2),mean absolute error(MAE)and root mean square error(RMSE).Results showed that the height to live crown base(HCB),relative spacing index(RS)and stand age(A)were the dominant factors in CW-DBH models.The goodness-of-fits of mixed-effect CW-DBH models(R~2,MAE and RMSE)were 0.703 0,0.386 6 and 0.515 4,and those of mixedeffect generalized model were 0.705 1,0.382 2 and 0.513 6,respectively,which were better than those of the OLS models.However,the difference in goodness-of-fit between the mixed-effect basic and generalized models was not significant(below 1%).Canopy decreased with the increase of A and height of HCB,but increased with the increase of RS.
引文
[1]Yang Y,Huang S.Allometric modelling of crown width for white spruce by fixed-and mixed-effects models[J].Forestry Chronicle,2017,93(2):138-147.
    [2]符利勇,孙华.基于混合效应模型的杉木单木冠幅预测模型[J].林业科学,2013,49(8):65-74.[Fu Liyong,Sun Hua.Individual crown diameter prediction for Cuninghamia lanceolata forests based on mixed effects models[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2013,49(8):65-74.]
    [3]刘江,徐先英,丁爱强,等.荒漠灌木侧影面积的数字化测定及应用[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(5):1 070-1 076.[Liu Jiang,Xu Xianying,Ding Aiqiang,et al.Application of digitized measurement in upwind project area of desert shrubs[J].Arid Zone Research,2017,34(5):1 070-1 076.]
    [4]赵维俊,刘贤德,金铭,等.祁连山青海云杉林群落结构特征分析[J].干旱区研究,2012,29(4):615-620.[Zhao Weijun,Liu Xiande,Jin Ming,et al.Analysis on community structure of picea crassifolia forests in the Qilian Mountains[J].Arid Zone Research,2012,29(4):615-620.]
    [5]Pretzsch H,Biber P,Uhl E,et al.Crown size and growing space requirement of common tree species in urban centres,parks,and forests[J].Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2015,14(3):466-479.
    [6]Bechtold W A.Crown-diameter prediction models for 87 species of stand-grown trees in the Eastern United States[J].Southern Journal of Applied Forestry,2003,27(4):269-278.
    [7]Gill S J,Biging G S,Murphy E C.Modeling conifer tree crown radius and estimating canopy cover[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2000,126(3):405-416.
    [8]Sharma R P,Vacek Z,Vacek S.Individual tree crown width models for Norway spruce and European beech in Czech Republic[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2016,366:208-220.
    [9]Sharma R P,Bílek L,Vacek Z,et al.Modelling crown width-diameter relationship for Scots pine in the central Europe[J].Trees,2017:1-15
    [10]Thorpe H C,Astrup R,Trowbridge A,et al.Competition and tree crowns:A neighborhood analysis of three boreal tree species[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2010,259(8):1 586-1 596.
    [11]Crecentecampo F,lvarezgonzález J G,Castedodorado F,et al.Development of crown profile models for Pinus pinaster Ait.and Pinus sylvestris L.in northwestern Spain[J].Forestry,2013,86(4):481-491.
    [12]Pinheiro J C,Bates D M.Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS[M].New York:Springer-Verlag,2000:271-395.
    [13]臧颢,雷相东,张会儒,等.红松树高—胸径的非线性混合效应模型研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(6):8-16.[Zang Hao,Lei Xiangdong,Zhang Huiru,et al.Nonlinear mixed-effects height-diameter model of Pinus koraiensis[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2016,38(6):8-16.]
    [14]姜立春,李凤日.混合效应模型在林业建模中的应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:1-20.[Jiang Lichun,Li Fengri.Application of Mixed Effects Model in Forestry Modeling[M].Beijing:Science Press,2014:1-20.]
    [15]Fu L Y,Sun H,Sharma R P,et al.Nonlinear mixed-effects crown width models for individual trees of Chinese fir(Cunninghamia lanceolata)in South-Central China[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2013,302(6):210-220.
    [16]Fu L Y,Sharma R P,Hao K J,et al.A generalized interregional nonlinear mixed-effects crown width model for Prince Rupprecht larch in Northern China[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2017,389:364-373.
    [17]朱教君,曾德慧,康宏樟,等.沙地樟子松人工林衰退机制[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2005:10-40.[Zhu Jiaojun,Zeng Dehui,Kang Hongzhang,et al.Decline of Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica Plantations on Sandy Land[M].Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House,2005:10-40.]
    [18]Zhu J J,Fan Z P,Zeng D H,et al.Comparison of stand structure and growth between artificial and natural forests of Pinus sylvestiris var.mongolica,on sandy land[J].Journal of Forest Research,2003,14(2):103-111.
    [19]雷泽勇,周晏平,赵国军,等.竞争对辽宁西北部樟子松人工固沙林树高生长的影响[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(1):961-966.[Lei Zeyong,Zhou Yanping,Zhao Guojun,et al.Effects of competition on tree height growth of sand fixation plantations of Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica in Northwest Liaoning Province[J].Arid Zone Research,2018,35(1):961-966.]
    [20]焦树仁.辽宁省章古台樟子松固沙林提早衰弱的原因与防治措施[J].林业科学,2001,37(2):131-138.[Jiao Shuren.Report on the causes of the early decline of Pinus slyvestris var.mongolica shelterbelt and its preventative and control measures in Zhanggutai of Liaoning Province[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2001,37(2):131-138.]
    [21]Xu H,Sun Y J,Wang X J,et al.Linear mixed-effects models to describe individual tree crown width for China-fir in Fujian Province,Southeast China[J].Plo S One,2015,10(4):e0122257.
    [22]Fang Z,Bailey R L.Nonlinear mixed effects modeling for slash pine dominant height growth following intensive silvicultural treatments[J].Forest Science,2001,47(3):287-300.
    [23]Huang S,Douglasp W,Yang Y,et al.Assessing the impacts of species composition,top height and density on individual tree height prediction of quaking aspen in boreal mixedwoods[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2009,258(7):1 235-1 247.
    [24]Temesgen H T,Monleon V J M,Hann D W H.Analysis and comparison of nonlinear tree height prediction strategies for Douglas-fir forests[J].Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2008,38(38):553-565.
    [25]Sharma R P,Breidenbach J.Modeling height-diameter relationships for Norway spruce,Scots pine,and downy birch using Norwegian national forest inventory data[J].Forest Science and Technology,2015,11(1):44-53.
    [26]Gómez-García E,Fonseca T F,Crecente-Campo F,et al.Height-diameter models for maritime pine in Portugal:A comparison of basic,generalized and mixed-effects models[J].Forest-Biogeosciences and Forestry,2015,9:72-78.
    [27]Power H,Le May V,Berninger F,et al.Differences in crown characteristics between black(Picea mariana)and white spruce(Picea glauca)[J].Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2012,42(9):1 733-1 743.
    [28]Zhao D,Michael K,Brucee B.Development and applications of the relative spacing model for loblolly pine plantations[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2010,259(10):1 922-1 929.
    [29]董晨,吴保国,韩焱云,等.基于修正函数的杉木人工林单木冠幅预测模型[J].东北林业大学学报,2015,43(5):49-53.[Dong Chen,Wu Baoguo,Han Yanyun,et al.An individual crownwidth model for Chinese fir plantation based on modified function[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2015,43(5):49-53.]
    [30]Ishii H,Mcdowell N.Age-related development of crown structure in coastal Douglas-fir trees[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2002,169(3):257-270.
    [31]Uzoh F C C,Oliver W W.Individual tree diameter increment model for managed even-aged stands of ponderosa pine throughout the western United States using a multilevel linear mixed effects model[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2008,256(3):438-445.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700