两种葡萄孢属真菌对不同品种百合花瓣和叶片的侵染能力比较
|
摘要
为明确两种葡萄孢属真菌对不同百合品种叶片和花瓣的侵染能力,采用离体叶片接种法测定灰葡萄孢Botrytis cinerea和椭圆葡萄孢Botrytis elliptica对4个百合品种叶片和花瓣的侵染时间和病斑扩展速度。结果表明,供试百合花瓣接种灰葡萄孢病斑出现时间明显早于叶片,而不同品种花瓣接种椭圆葡萄孢病斑出现时间差异显著。此外,百合品种‘木门’叶片接种椭圆葡萄孢96 h后仍没有病斑出现,而花瓣接种后48 h病斑出现,说明‘木门’叶片对椭圆葡萄孢抗性较强,而花瓣较易感病。
Botrytis cinerea and Botrytis elliptica were determined for infection of different Lilium cultivars, aiming at clarification of the pathogenicity of the two Botrytis species. The main cultivated lily varieties in Yunnan Province were collected and in vitro inoculated with the two Botrytis species.The results showed that lesions caused by B. cinerea in petals occurred earlier than that in leaves. On the other hand, the occurrence time of the lesions caused by B. elliptica in petals varied in different lily cultivars(48 h or later). There was no lesion caused by B. elliptica on leaves of ‘Conca D'or'after 96 h inoculation, while the lesion on petal caused by B. elliptica was observed after 48 h inoculation, which suggested that the leaves of ‘Conca D'or' were more resistant than the petals to infection by B. elliptica.
Botrytis cinerea and Botrytis elliptica were determined for infection of different Lilium cultivars, aiming at clarification of the pathogenicity of the two Botrytis species. The main cultivated lily varieties in Yunnan Province were collected and in vitro inoculated with the two Botrytis species.The results showed that lesions caused by B. cinerea in petals occurred earlier than that in leaves. On the other hand, the occurrence time of the lesions caused by B. elliptica in petals varied in different lily cultivars(48 h or later). There was no lesion caused by B. elliptica on leaves of ‘Conca D'or'after 96 h inoculation, while the lesion on petal caused by B. elliptica was observed after 48 h inoculation, which suggested that the leaves of ‘Conca D'or' were more resistant than the petals to infection by B. elliptica.
引文
[1]张忠义.中国真菌志(第26卷)[M].北京:科学出版社,2006:37-56.
[2]Jarvis W R.Taxonomy[M]//Coley-Smith J R,Verhoeff K,Jarvis W R.The Biology of Botrytis.London:Academic Press,1980:1-18.
[3]朱丽梅,罗凤霞,李明凤,殷英.底特律等8个百合品种对百合灰霉病的抗病性鉴定[J].江苏农业科学,2012,40(5):81-83.
[4]瞿友均,徐源辉.百合灰霉病的发生特点和综合防治方法[J].中国植保导刊,2010,30(4):26-27.
[5]朱丽梅,胡凤荣,罗凤霞.不同百合品种对百合灰霉病的抗病性鉴定[J].植物保护,2010,36(3):148-151
[6]杜运鹏.我国百合属植物资源评价及抗病基因同源序列(RGA)的研究[D].北京:北京林业大学博士学位论文,2014.
[7]张玉静,王志刚,印东生,王平.百合主要病害及防治[J].北方园艺,2007(11):202.
[8]邵小斌,赵统利,周朝东,朱朋波,刘兴满,孙明伟,汤雪燕,井泽仁.补光对百合Conca D'or切花的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(10):135-136.
[9]梁育勤,刘志忠,叶志勇.厦门地区百合新品种引种栽培[J].亚热带植物科学,2000,29(1):41-44.
[10]李锦馨,李宁.东方系百合引种试验研究[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(35):15708-15711.
[11]杨爽,袁晓娜,王中轩,杜运鹏,贾桂霞.‘OT’系列百合品种评价体系的构建[J].北方园艺,2014(14):55-58.
[2]Jarvis W R.Taxonomy[M]//Coley-Smith J R,Verhoeff K,Jarvis W R.The Biology of Botrytis.London:Academic Press,1980:1-18.
[3]朱丽梅,罗凤霞,李明凤,殷英.底特律等8个百合品种对百合灰霉病的抗病性鉴定[J].江苏农业科学,2012,40(5):81-83.
[4]瞿友均,徐源辉.百合灰霉病的发生特点和综合防治方法[J].中国植保导刊,2010,30(4):26-27.
[5]朱丽梅,胡凤荣,罗凤霞.不同百合品种对百合灰霉病的抗病性鉴定[J].植物保护,2010,36(3):148-151
[6]杜运鹏.我国百合属植物资源评价及抗病基因同源序列(RGA)的研究[D].北京:北京林业大学博士学位论文,2014.
[7]张玉静,王志刚,印东生,王平.百合主要病害及防治[J].北方园艺,2007(11):202.
[8]邵小斌,赵统利,周朝东,朱朋波,刘兴满,孙明伟,汤雪燕,井泽仁.补光对百合Conca D'or切花的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(10):135-136.
[9]梁育勤,刘志忠,叶志勇.厦门地区百合新品种引种栽培[J].亚热带植物科学,2000,29(1):41-44.
[10]李锦馨,李宁.东方系百合引种试验研究[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(35):15708-15711.
[11]杨爽,袁晓娜,王中轩,杜运鹏,贾桂霞.‘OT’系列百合品种评价体系的构建[J].北方园艺,2014(14):55-58.