五四新女性神话的建构与矛盾冲突——以冯沅君《卷葹》中的文本裂隙为中心
|
摘要
在"五四"新文化的启迪催动下,"个性解放""婚恋自由"成为推动社会变革重要的启蒙话语,五四新女性神话在此阶段孕育而出。冯沅君的代表作《卷葹》以其大胆的笔触参与了这一时期五四新女性神话的小说文本的建构。但在五四新女性神话演绎的过程中,小说在作者新旧思想的多重作用下呈现出了复杂的文本裂隙。以冯沅君《卷葹》为代表的这种神话模型在文学群体中引起短时间的轰动之后,又很快消解,这与其所处时代的变化及个人后来对于婚恋问题的思想转变有关,同时也质疑了这一系列新女性神话的建构对启蒙的有效性。
With the enlightenment of the May Fourth new culture movement, "liberation of individuality" and "freedom in love and marriage" became important enlightening discourses for promoting social transformation. The myths of May Fourth New Women were born at this stage. Feng Yuanjun's masterpiece Siberian Cocklebur with her bold brushstrokes par ticipated in the construction of the important novel text of the May Fourth New Women mythology during this period. However,in the process of demystifying the May Fourth New Women mythology, the novel presented complex textual flaws under the multiple effects of the author's new and old thoughts. The mythological model represented by Feng Yuanjun's Siberian Cocklebur was soon dispelled after a short-lived sensation in the literary community. The reason for this is related to the change in the times and the individual's later thought change in the issue of marriage, but on the other hand, it also questions the validity of the reflection and enlightenment constructed by this series of myths.
With the enlightenment of the May Fourth new culture movement, "liberation of individuality" and "freedom in love and marriage" became important enlightening discourses for promoting social transformation. The myths of May Fourth New Women were born at this stage. Feng Yuanjun's masterpiece Siberian Cocklebur with her bold brushstrokes par ticipated in the construction of the important novel text of the May Fourth New Women mythology during this period. However,in the process of demystifying the May Fourth New Women mythology, the novel presented complex textual flaws under the multiple effects of the author's new and old thoughts. The mythological model represented by Feng Yuanjun's Siberian Cocklebur was soon dispelled after a short-lived sensation in the literary community. The reason for this is related to the change in the times and the individual's later thought change in the issue of marriage, but on the other hand, it also questions the validity of the reflection and enlightenment constructed by this series of myths.
引文
[1]茅盾.茅盾选集:第5卷[M].成都:四川文艺出版社,1985.
[2]孟祥荣,孙祖娟.论晚清视野下的梁启超女性权利思想[J].五邑大学学报,2011(3).
[3]赵云泽.中国时尚杂志的历史衍变[M].福州:福建人民出版社,2010.
[4]宋剑华.错位的对话:论“娜拉”现象的中国言说[J].文学评论,2011(1).
[5]冰心.记事珠[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1982.
[6]杨珺.演绎和表现自由:试论冯沅君的爱情叙事[J].广西师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(5).
[7]冯沅君.卷葹[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1983.
[8]李欧梵.现代性的追求[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2000.
[9]黄人影.当代中国女作家论[M].上海:上海书店出版社,1985.
[10]贾玉民,黄秉荣.中国现代作家笔名趣谈[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1989.
[11]鲁迅.鲁迅全集:第11卷[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1981.
[12]王雪丽.冯沅君小说叙事中的女性意识研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2017.
[2]孟祥荣,孙祖娟.论晚清视野下的梁启超女性权利思想[J].五邑大学学报,2011(3).
[3]赵云泽.中国时尚杂志的历史衍变[M].福州:福建人民出版社,2010.
[4]宋剑华.错位的对话:论“娜拉”现象的中国言说[J].文学评论,2011(1).
[5]冰心.记事珠[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1982.
[6]杨珺.演绎和表现自由:试论冯沅君的爱情叙事[J].广西师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(5).
[7]冯沅君.卷葹[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1983.
[8]李欧梵.现代性的追求[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2000.
[9]黄人影.当代中国女作家论[M].上海:上海书店出版社,1985.
[10]贾玉民,黄秉荣.中国现代作家笔名趣谈[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1989.
[11]鲁迅.鲁迅全集:第11卷[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1981.
[12]王雪丽.冯沅君小说叙事中的女性意识研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2017.