2000年以来中国高耗能产业的空间格局演化及其成因
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The Evolution of Spatial Distribution and Its Influencing Factors of High-Energy Intensive Industry in China Since 2000
  • 作者:刘汉初 ; 樊杰 ; 周道静 ; 张海朋
  • 英文作者:LIU Hanchu;FAN Jie;ZHOU Daojing;ZHANG Haipeng;Institute of Science and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences;Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research/Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling,Chinese Academy of Sciences;College of Resources and Environment,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development,Henan University;
  • 关键词:高耗能产业 ; 面板数据 ; 资源节约与环境友好 ; 产业转移 ; 环境规制 ; 高质量发展
  • 英文关键词:high-energy intensive industry;;panel data;;resource conservation and environmental friendliness;;industrial transfer;;environmental regulation;;high-quality development
  • 中文刊名:JJDL
  • 英文刊名:Economic Geography
  • 机构:中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院;中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所/区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室;中国科学院大学资源与环境学院;河南大学黄河文明与可持续发展研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-26
  • 出版单位:经济地理
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39;No.255
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金重点项目(41630644)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JJDL201905013
  • 页数:9
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:43-1126/K
  • 分类号:112-120
摘要
优化高耗能产业空间布局对新时期推进经济高质量发展和生态文明建设都具有重要意义。基于2000—2016年的省级面板数据,文章探讨中国高耗能产业的空间布局演化及其成因。通过计算区位基尼系数、产业集中度,发现高耗能产业省区分布较为集中,主要分布在山东、江苏、河南、广东等少数省份。动态格局方面,高耗能产业的空间格局发生重大变化,集疏过程经历"集聚—扩散—集聚"的阶段性变化。区域间主要表现为东北地区向中西部地区转移,东部地区产业份额总体不变,但区域内部格局变化显著,表现为北京、上海和广东向山东和江苏发生大规模转移。基于相关理论,文章构建高耗能产业空间分布影响因素的计量模型。统计分析表明,经济发展水平和历史基础是影响高耗能产业布局的主要因素,但影响强度正在逐步弱化;资源禀赋和经济全球化通过影响企业原材料和中间产品获取途径作用于高耗能产业的空间布局,但前者作用强度正逐渐减弱,而后者的影响则日益突出;环境规制和政府干预正逐渐成为促使高耗能产业空间扩散的重要驱动力。
        Optimizing the space layout of high-energy intensive industry is of great significance to promote the construction of ecological civilization in the new era. Based on the provincial panel data from 2000 to 2016, this paper explores the spatial evolution of China's high-energy intensive industry. By calculating the location Gini coefficient and industrial concentration, it is found that the evolution of the spatial pattern of China's high-energy intensive industry has experienced the staged characteristics of "aggregation-diffusion-agglomeration". The provinces with high-energy intensive industry are relatively concentrated and are mainly distributed in a few provinces such as Shandong, Jiangsu,Henan and Guangdong. In terms of the time trend, the spatial pattern of high-energy intensive industry has undergone major changes, and the inter-regional exchanges have mainly manifested itself in the transition from the northeastern region to the central and western regions. The overall share of the industry in the eastern region remains stable, but the internal structure of the region has undergone significant changes and shows a large shift from Beijing, Shanghai and Guangdong to Shandong and Jiangsu. Based on related theories, we construct an econometric model of the influencing factors for spatial distribution of high-energy intensive industry. Statistical analysis shows that the economic level and historical basis are the main factors affecting the distribution of high-energy intensive industry, but the impact strength is gradually weakening. Resource endowments and economic globalization affect the spatial layout of high-energy intensive industry by affecting the way that companies obtain raw materials and intermediate products. However, the impact strength of the former is gradually weakening, while the latter's strength is increasingly prominent. Environmental regulation and government intervention are gradually becoming important driving forces for the spatial dispersion of highenergy intensive industry.
引文
[1]邵文彬,李方一.产能过剩背景下我国高耗能行业增长的动因分析[J].软科学,2018,32(1):41-46.
    [2] Lin B,Tan R. Sustainable development of China's energy intensive industries:From the aspect of carbon dioxide emissions re‐duction[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2017,77:386-394.
    [3]沈可挺,龚健健.环境污染、技术进步与中国高耗能产业——基于环境全要素生产率的实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2011(12):25-34.
    [4]樊杰.中国主体功能区划方案[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):186-201.
    [5] Fan J,Wang Y,Ouyang Z,et al. Risk forewarning of regional development sustainability based on a natural resources and en‐vironmental carrying index in China[J]. Earths Future,2017,5(2):196-213.
    [6] He C,Pan F,Chen T. Research Progress of Industry Geography in China Science Press[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2016,26(8):1 057-1 066.
    [7]罗胤晨,谷人旭. 1980—2011年中国制造业空间集聚格局及其演变趋势[J].经济地理,2014,34(7):82-89.
    [8] Zhang X,Kloosterman RC. Connecting the"workshop of the world":Intra-and extra-service networks of the Pearl River Del‐ta city-region[J]. Regional Studies,2016,50(6):1 069-1 081.
    [9]原嫄,李国平,孙铁山,等.中国制造业重心的空间分布变化特征与趋势研究——基于2001年和2009年数据的实证分析[J].人文地理,2015,30(5):99-105.
    [10]胡伟,张玉杰.中国工业发展的空间格局演变[J].经济地理,2015,35(7):105-112.
    [11]贺灿飞,朱彦刚,朱晟君.产业特性、区域特征与中国制造业省区集聚[J].地理学报,2010,65(10):1 218-1 228.
    [12]焦兵,李方超.中国油气资源产业的空间布局及影响因素研究[J].中国矿业,2013,22(9):1-5,10.
    [13] Drucker J. Regional industrial structure concentration in the United States:Trends and implications[J]. Economic Geogra‐phy,2011,87(4):421-452.
    [14]贺曲夫,刘友金.我国东中西部地区间产业转移的特征与趋势——基于2000—2010年统计数据的实证分析[J].经济地理,2012,32(12):85-90.
    [15]石敏俊,逄瑞,郑丹,等.中国制造业产业结构演进的区域分异与环境效应[J].经济地理,2017,37(10):108-115.
    [16]周沂,贺灿飞,刘颖.中国污染密集型产业地理分布研究[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(7):1 183-1 196.
    [17]廖双红,肖雁飞.污染产业区域间转移与中部地区碳转移空间特征及启示[J].经济地理,2017,37(2):132-140.
    [18]贺灿飞,朱彦刚.中国资源密集型产业地理分布研究——以石油加工业和黑色金属产业为例[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(3):488-501.
    [19]高菠阳.中国重点工业行业空间变化特征[J].经济地理,2012,32(3):82-88.
    [20]孙祥栋,张亮亮.中国有色金属行业的地理分布——基于空间杜宾模型的实证分析[J].技术经济,2016(6):96-100.
    [21]刘鹤,金凤君,刘毅.中国石化产业空间组织的演进历程与机制[J].地理研究,2012,31(11):2 031-2 043.
    [22] Gini C. Measurement of inequality of incomes[J]. The Economic Journal,1921,31(121):124-126.
    [23] Bartolucci F,Bellio R,Salvan A,et al. Modified profile likelihood for fixed-effects panel data models[J]. Econometric Re‐views,2016,35(7):1 271-1 289.
    [24] Zhang W,Pan X,Yan Y,et al. Convergence analysis of regional energy efficiency in china based on large-dimensional panel data model[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,142:801-808.
    [25]中华人民共和国国家统计局.中华人民共和国2017年国民经济和社会发展公报[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2018.
    [26] Heckscher EF,Ohlin B. Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory[M].Cambridge:The MIT Press,1991.
    [27] Martinez-Galarraga J. The determinants of industrial location in Spain:1856-1929[J]. Explorations in Economic History,2012,49(2):255-275.
    [28] Krugman P. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography[J].Journal of Political Economy,1991,99:483-499.
    [29]梁育填,樊杰,柳林,等.优化开发区域制造业企业迁移的因素及其区域影响:以广东东莞市为例[J].地理研究,2013,32(3):497-506.
    [30]王国蒙,王元地,杨雪.环境管制对环境库兹涅兹曲线的影响研究[J].软科学,2017,31(12):78-81,86.
    [31]黄继忠,冀刚.外部性与产业发展——一个理论分析框架[J].技术经济与管理研究,2018(2):113-118.
    [32]沈静.环境管制影响下的佛山陶瓷产业区位变动机制[J].地理学报,2012,67(4):467-478.
    [33]国务院公报.国务院关于“十一五”期间各地区单位生产总值能源消耗降低指标计划的批复[EB/OL]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2006/content_443285.htm,2018-06-01.
    (1)根据国务院和国家发展改革委出台的有关“四大板块”的区域规划和指导意见,“四大板块”主要指东部、中部、西部和东北地区,其中东部地区包括北京、天津、河北、山东、江苏、上海、浙江、福建、广东和海南10省市,中部地区包括湖北、湖南、江西、安徽、河南和山西6省,东北地区包括辽宁、吉林、黑龙江3省,西部地区包括重庆、四川、贵州、云南、广西、陕西、甘肃、青海、宁夏、西藏、新疆和内蒙古12个省市区。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700