“互联网+”环境下文献遗产“活化保护”模式研究
|
摘要
保护好、开发好、传承好文献遗产,对于维护社会记忆的完整性、提升民族文化身份的认同度具有重要意义。"互联网+"环境下文献遗产"活化保护"模式在保护内容、保护主体、传播方式上呈现出一定的优势,但也因缺乏统一的数字化标准规范、技术与经费投入不足、文献保护人才队伍薄弱、社会参与缺乏动力等因素,使得"活化保护"存在诸多阻碍因素。本文拟从线下实体保护与线上活态展现两方面,构建多元素、多主体、开放共享的文献遗产"活化保护"模式。
Protecting, developing and inheriting the documentary heritage has great significance for maintaining the integrity of human social memory and arousing the identification, pride and roots of national cultural identity. The "activating protection" model of documentary heritage under the "Internet+" environment presents certain advantages in protecting content, protecting subjects and disseminating modes.However, there are obstacles to "activating protection",such as the lack of unified digital standardization norms, the lack of technical and financial investment,the weak team of document protection talents,and the lack of motivation for social participation.Combining with the "Internet Plus" environment, it is planned to build a multi-element, multi-subject, opensharing of the "activating protection" model from the offline physical protection and online live display,and is expected to have reference significance for the construction of folk documentary heritage protection.
Protecting, developing and inheriting the documentary heritage has great significance for maintaining the integrity of human social memory and arousing the identification, pride and roots of national cultural identity. The "activating protection" model of documentary heritage under the "Internet+" environment presents certain advantages in protecting content, protecting subjects and disseminating modes.However, there are obstacles to "activating protection",such as the lack of unified digital standardization norms, the lack of technical and financial investment,the weak team of document protection talents,and the lack of motivation for social participation.Combining with the "Internet Plus" environment, it is planned to build a multi-element, multi-subject, opensharing of the "activating protection" model from the offline physical protection and online live display,and is expected to have reference significance for the construction of folk documentary heritage protection.
引文
[1]赵跃,周耀林.国际文献保护研究回顾与展望——以Restaurator 1970年代以来刊文为对象[J].图书馆论坛,2017,37(6):111-121.
[2]福建省档案局《福建侨批与申遗》课题组.福建《侨批档案》的申遗之路[J].中国档案,2013(8):37-39.
[3]福建省档案局《福建侨批与申遗》课题组.世界记忆视野中福建侨批的价值研究[J].福建档案,2017(1):13-21.
[4]刘家真,廖茹.我国古籍、纸质文物与档案保护比较研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(4):88-98.
[5]张文亮,尚奋宇.我国古籍数字化标准体系现状调查及优化策略[J].国家图书馆学刊,2015,24(6):83-89.
[6]李业珅.番客压箱底的“老黄历”字缝里都是漂泊的血泪[N].南方日报,2017-12-28(A13).
[7]聂云霞,王新才.中国文献遗产数字化保护的现状与推进[J].档案与建设,2013(7):6-9.
[8]周耀林,宁优.“世界记忆工程”背景下“中国档案文献遗产工程”的推进[J].信息资源管理学报,2014,4(3):36-44.
[9]高鹏,陈聃.文献遗产:“档案”的嬗变与发展——《档案法》向《文献遗产法》转型的思考[J].档案学通讯,2013(3):49-52.
[10]王星光,贾兵强.国外历史文化遗产保护机制及其对我国的启示[J].广西民族研究,2008(1):178-185.
[11]王小云,陈闽芳.用跨界思维打造档案人才实践创新能力——以福建师范大学档案学专业为例[J].档案学通讯,2018(2):73-76.
[12]贾平凡.数字化唤醒“两地书”[N].人民日报海外版,2018-05-09(006).
[13]李韵.让收藏在博物馆里的文物“活”起来[N].光明日报,2018-03-30(009).
[2]福建省档案局《福建侨批与申遗》课题组.福建《侨批档案》的申遗之路[J].中国档案,2013(8):37-39.
[3]福建省档案局《福建侨批与申遗》课题组.世界记忆视野中福建侨批的价值研究[J].福建档案,2017(1):13-21.
[4]刘家真,廖茹.我国古籍、纸质文物与档案保护比较研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(4):88-98.
[5]张文亮,尚奋宇.我国古籍数字化标准体系现状调查及优化策略[J].国家图书馆学刊,2015,24(6):83-89.
[6]李业珅.番客压箱底的“老黄历”字缝里都是漂泊的血泪[N].南方日报,2017-12-28(A13).
[7]聂云霞,王新才.中国文献遗产数字化保护的现状与推进[J].档案与建设,2013(7):6-9.
[8]周耀林,宁优.“世界记忆工程”背景下“中国档案文献遗产工程”的推进[J].信息资源管理学报,2014,4(3):36-44.
[9]高鹏,陈聃.文献遗产:“档案”的嬗变与发展——《档案法》向《文献遗产法》转型的思考[J].档案学通讯,2013(3):49-52.
[10]王星光,贾兵强.国外历史文化遗产保护机制及其对我国的启示[J].广西民族研究,2008(1):178-185.
[11]王小云,陈闽芳.用跨界思维打造档案人才实践创新能力——以福建师范大学档案学专业为例[J].档案学通讯,2018(2):73-76.
[12]贾平凡.数字化唤醒“两地书”[N].人民日报海外版,2018-05-09(006).
[13]李韵.让收藏在博物馆里的文物“活”起来[N].光明日报,2018-03-30(009).